GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: –
Quadell (
talk) 12:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Nominator:
User:Deryck Chan
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The prose is very good. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | MoS followed. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | References section is fine. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All statements are backed up by the sources. No plagiarism detected. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Not a problem. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | I think it does. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | No problems. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Although this is a controversial topic, the article does quite well at respecting all points of view. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No problems. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The image has a valid license, and Hong Kong's copyright law allows photographs of buildings. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Caption is good. I wish we had more images, but I can't find any. Even Flickr doesn't seem to have anything relevant. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Excellent work. |
None remaining.
This article now passes all criteria. Congratulations! – Quadell ( talk) 15:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: –
Quadell (
talk) 12:14, 6 August 2011 (UTC)
Nominator:
User:Deryck Chan
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. | The prose is very good. | |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. | MoS followed. | |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | References section is fine. | |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | All statements are backed up by the sources. No plagiarism detected. | |
2c. it contains no original research. | Not a problem. | |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | I think it does. | |
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | No problems. | |
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | Although this is a controversial topic, the article does quite well at respecting all points of view. | |
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | No problems. | |
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | The image has a valid license, and Hong Kong's copyright law allows photographs of buildings. | |
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | Caption is good. I wish we had more images, but I can't find any. Even Flickr doesn't seem to have anything relevant. | |
7. Overall assessment. | Excellent work. |
None remaining.
This article now passes all criteria. Congratulations! – Quadell ( talk) 15:20, 10 August 2011 (UTC)