This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 March 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article contains material taken near-verbatim from this source and possibly others under a license incompatible with Wikipedia. It also contains material copied from another Wikipedia article without proper attribution, per WP:CWW. Nikkimaria ( talk) 15:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
The small extent of the copying should be within the realm of Fair Use (a belief evidenced by my willingness to quote this text above) but definitely it fails Wikipedia policy - though I've not received any suggestion to crack down in QPQ reviewing DYKs when noticing paraphrasing not all that much less. [1] It has been my perception that Wikipedia is more concerned with copyright per se than imposing a teacher's strict interpretation of plagiarism. And most of the rest of the text is direct quotes; I tried four of the biggest sections and didn't get a direct match. My hope is that some quick and limited editing can clear this pall from the article. Wnt ( talk) 19:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
In furtherance of this, I have just redone the entire article from end to end to be sure, and so have removed the paraphrasing tag. [2] Wnt ( talk) 20:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an
educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by
WikiProject Cyberlaw and the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2014 Q1 term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
17:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from American Civil Liberties Union v. Clapper appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 3 March 2014 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
This article contains material taken near-verbatim from this source and possibly others under a license incompatible with Wikipedia. It also contains material copied from another Wikipedia article without proper attribution, per WP:CWW. Nikkimaria ( talk) 15:35, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
The small extent of the copying should be within the realm of Fair Use (a belief evidenced by my willingness to quote this text above) but definitely it fails Wikipedia policy - though I've not received any suggestion to crack down in QPQ reviewing DYKs when noticing paraphrasing not all that much less. [1] It has been my perception that Wikipedia is more concerned with copyright per se than imposing a teacher's strict interpretation of plagiarism. And most of the rest of the text is direct quotes; I tried four of the biggest sections and didn't get a direct match. My hope is that some quick and limited editing can clear this pall from the article. Wnt ( talk) 19:30, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
In furtherance of this, I have just redone the entire article from end to end to be sure, and so have removed the paraphrasing tag. [2] Wnt ( talk) 20:22, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
This article is the subject of an
educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by
WikiProject Cyberlaw and the
Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2014 Q1 term. Further details are available
on the course page.
The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}}
by
PrimeBOT (
talk) on
17:21, 2 January 2023 (UTC)