Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Mm40 ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm Mm40 ( talk · contribs) and I'll be reviewing this nomination against the good article criteria. I'll be watching this page, and I'll be very active over the next few days, so you should just leave any comments or questions here. Thanks, Mm40 ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
My first impression is that the article is very short, as most of it is background. However, after looking for more sources (using JSTOR and EBSCOhost and such) and looking at the talk page, I realize the article is actually longer than one would think it could be. Thus, length isn't a problem.
That's all I can find for this otherwise very nice article. I'll happily pass this after these issues are resolved. Cheers, Mm40 ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Mm40 ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Hi there, I'm Mm40 ( talk · contribs) and I'll be reviewing this nomination against the good article criteria. I'll be watching this page, and I'll be very active over the next few days, so you should just leave any comments or questions here. Thanks, Mm40 ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
My first impression is that the article is very short, as most of it is background. However, after looking for more sources (using JSTOR and EBSCOhost and such) and looking at the talk page, I realize the article is actually longer than one would think it could be. Thus, length isn't a problem.
That's all I can find for this otherwise very nice article. I'll happily pass this after these issues are resolved. Cheers, Mm40 ( talk) 13:43, 3 April 2010 (UTC)