| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
AmbieSense article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | This page was
proposed for deletion by
Jovanmilic97 (
talk ·
contribs) on 24 October 2018 with the comment: Non notable subject that fails WP:GNG for over 7 years now. Also seems like the case of WP:PROMO, the article's creator only has the edits on this article alone. It was contested by Djm-leighpark ( talk · contribs) on 2018-10-25 with the comment: Some signs there may be notability |
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
- Impact
- some detailed information
- Scraper-maybe
- Question: Same Company or different company
- P399 of ECSM2015-Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Social Media ISBN: 978-1-910810-31-6 is seems might be independent
The project/company has shown at least reasonable ability to WP:SUSTAIN. It may (or may not) be innovative. Fully independent references may/can be difficult to say the least. If I had more time I would dig deeper but enough concern to dePROD an article with some content (albeit poor citing) of over a decade of standing. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
AmbieSense article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
|
| This page was
proposed for deletion by
Jovanmilic97 (
talk ·
contribs) on 24 October 2018 with the comment: Non notable subject that fails WP:GNG for over 7 years now. Also seems like the case of WP:PROMO, the article's creator only has the edits on this article alone. It was contested by Djm-leighpark ( talk · contribs) on 2018-10-25 with the comment: Some signs there may be notability |
| Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
- Impact
- some detailed information
- Scraper-maybe
- Question: Same Company or different company
- P399 of ECSM2015-Proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Social Media ISBN: 978-1-910810-31-6 is seems might be independent
The project/company has shown at least reasonable ability to WP:SUSTAIN. It may (or may not) be innovative. Fully independent references may/can be difficult to say the least. If I had more time I would dig deeper but enough concern to dePROD an article with some content (albeit poor citing) of over a decade of standing. Djm-leighpark ( talk) 13:24, 25 October 2018 (UTC)