This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mass surveillance Mid‑importance Amash–Conyers Amendment is within the scope of WikiProject Mass surveillance, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of mass surveillance and mass surveillance-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.Mass surveillanceWikipedia:WikiProject Mass surveillanceTemplate:WikiProject Mass surveillanceMass surveillance articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Freedom of speech Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Freedom of speech, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Freedom of speech on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Freedom of speechWikipedia:WikiProject Freedom of speechTemplate:WikiProject Freedom of speechFreedom of speech articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Espionage Low‑importance Amash–Conyers Amendment is within the scope of WikiProject Espionage, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of espionage, intelligence, and related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, or contribute to the discussion.EspionageWikipedia:WikiProject EspionageTemplate:WikiProject EspionageEspionage articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was nominated for deletion on 29 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

This source seems quite relevant and useful for the article. I have no idea why someone systematically deleted it, so I reverted. (I also reverted their removal of pictures of Amash and Conyers, which is more of a cosmetic decision - I don't see anything particularly harmful in keeping these images since usually we just toss in any somewhat relevant image we can find for an article) Wnt ( talk) 23:18, 1 April 2014 (UTC) reply