 | This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It's not clear that the scope of Osborne is very great at all. Any new union would have been be capable of having a political fund in their rules form day one. Moreover existing unions which did not have such a rule could probably adopt one by vote, and if not create a successor body which did. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough 11:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC).
|
| This article was nominated for deletion on 14 May 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
It's not clear that the scope of Osborne is very great at all. Any new union would have been be capable of having a political fund in their rules form day one. Moreover existing unions which did not have such a rule could probably adopt one by vote, and if not create a successor body which did. All the best:
Rich
Farmbrough 11:46, 2 February 2024 (UTC).