Talk:Am Buachaille is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Scotland and
Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles
Oh my - I can find everything from 240 ft (73 m) down to 50 m. The 65m I've used in the text seems fairly middling and comes from a non-climbing but vaguely official sort of source. Anyone want to take a punt on a better height for this one?
Blue Square Thing (
talk) 23:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)reply
I have had a hunt but I can see nothing better. Even
W. H. Murray, who mentions it, does not provide a height.
BenMacDui 16:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Thanks for looking - guess this will have to do for now then.
Blue Square Thing (
talk) 21:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Am Buachaille/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Talk:Am Buachaille is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use
geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the
project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
Scotland and
Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scottish Islands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
islands in Scotland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Scottish IslandsWikipedia:WikiProject Scottish IslandsTemplate:WikiProject Scottish IslandsScottish Islands articles
Oh my - I can find everything from 240 ft (73 m) down to 50 m. The 65m I've used in the text seems fairly middling and comes from a non-climbing but vaguely official sort of source. Anyone want to take a punt on a better height for this one?
Blue Square Thing (
talk) 23:16, 18 February 2014 (UTC)reply
I have had a hunt but I can see nothing better. Even
W. H. Murray, who mentions it, does not provide a height.
BenMacDui 16:02, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Thanks for looking - guess this will have to do for now then.
Blue Square Thing (
talk) 21:01, 22 February 2014 (UTC)reply
Assessment comment
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Am Buachaille/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following
several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.