This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

UK geography Low‑importance This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. England Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Isle of Wight High‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Isle of Wight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of the Isle of Wight in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Isle of WightWikipedia:WikiProject Isle of WightTemplate:WikiProject Isle of WightIsle of Wight-related articles High This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Just a little more detail is needed to get this to B-class I reckon. A little more about the amusement park, perhaps a couple of new subsections. -- Peeky44 ( talk) 01:51, 30 August 2008 (UTC) reply

See image from official site: despite the cliffs being sand, the beach itself is pebbly. Gordonofcartoon ( talk) 11:48, 2 September 2009 (UTC) reply

Ok. The changes look good! Editor5807 ^speak 20:48, 3 September 2009 (UTC) reply