I've brought together some images from other spots on Wikipedia, but now I am wondering whether some of them might not be cirrocumulus. It is difficult to judge the height of the clouds from the pictures alone. -- Solipsist 15:01, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I've heard that altocumulus clouds form dramatic "flying saucer" shapes and can be mistaken for UFOs. Should this be entered?
what are they formed from? droplets? ice? what? 41.243.185.32 21:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
ure a cow
moo —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
97.118.11.86 (
talk) 23:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
people are killing the world and clouds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
97.118.11.86 (
talk)
23:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The cloud infobox says it is not a precipitation cloud, but File:Virga 05.jpg shows Altocumulus virga. But isn't virga a form of precipitation? -- The High Fin Sperm Whale ( talk) 23:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Altocumulus cloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
In the text, only four species are mentioned, and Altocumulus floccus has been omitted. However, this species of cloud has been mentioned in the infobox, where five species are named. Search in Google Scholar and Google Books reveals enough reliable sources going back many years that have A. floccus as a recognised species of Altocumuls cluds. This needs to be included in the main text. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) ( talk) 11:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The gallery on the page is being disputed by me and @ Ewulp. Since I don't want to be engaged in an edit war, can you suggest anything helpful so that both parties are satisfied. 📖 ( 💬/ 📜) 22:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)
I've brought together some images from other spots on Wikipedia, but now I am wondering whether some of them might not be cirrocumulus. It is difficult to judge the height of the clouds from the pictures alone. -- Solipsist 15:01, 30 Mar 2005 (UTC)
I've heard that altocumulus clouds form dramatic "flying saucer" shapes and can be mistaken for UFOs. Should this be entered?
what are they formed from? droplets? ice? what? 41.243.185.32 21:23, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
ure a cow
moo —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
97.118.11.86 (
talk) 23:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
people are killing the world and clouds!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1 —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
97.118.11.86 (
talk)
23:47, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
The cloud infobox says it is not a precipitation cloud, but File:Virga 05.jpg shows Altocumulus virga. But isn't virga a form of precipitation? -- The High Fin Sperm Whale ( talk) 23:08, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Altocumulus cloud. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:51, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
In the text, only four species are mentioned, and Altocumulus floccus has been omitted. However, this species of cloud has been mentioned in the infobox, where five species are named. Search in Google Scholar and Google Books reveals enough reliable sources going back many years that have A. floccus as a recognised species of Altocumuls cluds. This needs to be included in the main text. Ashwin Baindur (User:AshLin) ( talk) 11:42, 27 August 2021 (UTC)
The gallery on the page is being disputed by me and @ Ewulp. Since I don't want to be engaged in an edit war, can you suggest anything helpful so that both parties are satisfied. 📖 ( 💬/ 📜) 22:30, 16 June 2023 (UTC)