This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

Villages ( defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Villages, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.VillagesWikipedia:WikiProject VillagesTemplate:WikiProject VillagesVillages articles Cities This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. India: Goa / Geography Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Goa (assessed as Low-importance). This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). This article was last assessed in April 2023. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Daily pageviews of this article A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Though I fixed it myself, am not so sure about the accuracy of its lat-long location, and it seems to be showing a point too far west on the map. This could have also affected the list of surrounding villages. Please help correct. Fredericknoronha ( talk) 22:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Think I fixed both... it appears correctly placed now. On the map. Fredericknoronha ( talk) 22:24, 22 April 2023 (UTC) reply

Nice work on the article. Regarding it's coordinates, I still feel it's a little bit off. As per Google Maps marking the coordinates should be "15.720997,73.906111", though I can't say it's 100% correct. Also the article seems to lack sources, so I'll suggest to add references to each sections which can be verified. Rejoy²⁰⁰³( talk) 04:46, 23 April 2023 (UTC) reply