This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the
discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
There is a very good reason for this article focusing on internet fame of Stokke and not her career: she has not performed at a notable level as a track and field athlete (see
WP:NTRACK). Her notability comes from the extensive sources exploring the phenomenon of sexualization of her as a young woman and a female athlete, hence the article reflects that balance and adds the academic and journalistic discussion on that subject in relation to Stokke. It would be completely wrong for the focus of the article to be that she was the 19th best American collegiate female pole vaulter of 2010 (see deletion discussions). Even so, this article still contains an exhaustive summary of her noteworthy pole vaulting achievements. Wikipedia articles are for documenting social history, not reconstructing it.
SFB 19:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Even her internet fame as a "sex symbol" is due more to public attention focused on Allan Stokke due to his history of creative defenses when handling sex crime cases. The attention was initially caused most directly by the case in late-2006/early-2007 involving Orange County police officer David Alex Park, though an earlier case where he challenged a 16 year old girl's claim of "mental anguish" by pointing out she was unconscious when his clients gang raped her seems to be what really spun up the Internet Hate Machine.
SymbolicJester (
talk) 09:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)reply
"Stokke reached new heights in her second year at college," - had more success
"scaling 4.21 m (13 ft 91⁄2 in) in Sacramento, California under the watchful eye of Cal coach and former 5-time All-American at UCLA, Scott Slover." - change the text in bold to close observation and five-time respectfully
"and made her debut at the NCAA Women's Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships," - debuted
"In her last year of collegiate vaulting she did not" - comma needed between "vaulting" and "she"
"However, in 2011 Stokke did place 8th at the" - eighth
"By 2016, her GoPro videos have received" - reword the text in bold to the videos since GoPro is already mentioned in the prior sentence
Also the source for the above sentence needs not to be the video itself, but an independent website like
[1] which has an update figures of the amount of views the video has received
There is some more info on her post-2012 vaulting activities in this source
[2] to aid the development of this sub-section
Partly done Still need to work on the last point --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 20:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Reference
References 8, 9 is missing the author
Reference 19 should be completly replaced with the following source
[3]
References 20 & 26 are missing the publisher of their respective works
I have added an author for reference 8, but reference 9 has no author named. --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 16:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Done I did the suggestions for reference 19 and 20, changed the one for 26 to the publisher website. --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 21:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Progress
This review will be put on hold for the time being.
MWright96(talk) 15:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the quick review MWright96, I have already added your suggestions for the early life section and will hopefully complete the rest tomorrow.
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 20:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Apologies, only managed to do the Internet fame section over the weekend. I'll try and finish the rest off over the upcoming week. --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 19:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Sorry
MWright96 if you feel like I've been going to slowly with this. I can understand if you decide to fail this considering that I have not implemented all your suggestions in over a week. Not been able to dedicate that much time and concentration to Wikipedia recently due to personal issues. Thanks for your work here, but I can't imagine that I will get this done before the weekend and will accept whatever decision you make.
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 20:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Emir of Wikipedia: I will give you all the time that you need to complete this article and will only consider failing it if the remaining issues cannot be addressed.
MWright96(talk) 14:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Unfortunately, since the nominator is inactive and unable to correct the remaining issues, I have taken the decision to fail this nomination. The article itself has potential to attain GA status and can be re-nominated in the future.
MWright96(talk) 16:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)reply
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or
poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially
libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to
this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to
join the project and
contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the
documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Athletics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the
sport of athletics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page and join the
discussion.AthleticsWikipedia:WikiProject AthleticsTemplate:WikiProject AthleticsAthletics articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's sport (and women in sports), a WikiProject which aims to improve coverage of women in sports on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the
project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the
discussion.Women's sportWikipedia:WikiProject Women's sportTemplate:WikiProject Women's sportWomen's sport articles
There is a very good reason for this article focusing on internet fame of Stokke and not her career: she has not performed at a notable level as a track and field athlete (see
WP:NTRACK). Her notability comes from the extensive sources exploring the phenomenon of sexualization of her as a young woman and a female athlete, hence the article reflects that balance and adds the academic and journalistic discussion on that subject in relation to Stokke. It would be completely wrong for the focus of the article to be that she was the 19th best American collegiate female pole vaulter of 2010 (see deletion discussions). Even so, this article still contains an exhaustive summary of her noteworthy pole vaulting achievements. Wikipedia articles are for documenting social history, not reconstructing it.
SFB 19:20, 12 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Even her internet fame as a "sex symbol" is due more to public attention focused on Allan Stokke due to his history of creative defenses when handling sex crime cases. The attention was initially caused most directly by the case in late-2006/early-2007 involving Orange County police officer David Alex Park, though an earlier case where he challenged a 16 year old girl's claim of "mental anguish" by pointing out she was unconscious when his clients gang raped her seems to be what really spun up the Internet Hate Machine.
SymbolicJester (
talk) 09:19, 13 August 2018 (UTC)reply
"Stokke reached new heights in her second year at college," - had more success
"scaling 4.21 m (13 ft 91⁄2 in) in Sacramento, California under the watchful eye of Cal coach and former 5-time All-American at UCLA, Scott Slover." - change the text in bold to close observation and five-time respectfully
"and made her debut at the NCAA Women's Division I Outdoor Track and Field Championships," - debuted
"In her last year of collegiate vaulting she did not" - comma needed between "vaulting" and "she"
"However, in 2011 Stokke did place 8th at the" - eighth
"By 2016, her GoPro videos have received" - reword the text in bold to the videos since GoPro is already mentioned in the prior sentence
Also the source for the above sentence needs not to be the video itself, but an independent website like
[1] which has an update figures of the amount of views the video has received
There is some more info on her post-2012 vaulting activities in this source
[2] to aid the development of this sub-section
Partly done Still need to work on the last point --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 20:03, 25 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Reference
References 8, 9 is missing the author
Reference 19 should be completly replaced with the following source
[3]
References 20 & 26 are missing the publisher of their respective works
I have added an author for reference 8, but reference 9 has no author named. --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 16:35, 28 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Done I did the suggestions for reference 19 and 20, changed the one for 26 to the publisher website. --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 21:22, 29 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Progress
This review will be put on hold for the time being.
MWright96(talk) 15:58, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Thanks for the quick review MWright96, I have already added your suggestions for the early life section and will hopefully complete the rest tomorrow.
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 20:47, 20 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Apologies, only managed to do the Internet fame section over the weekend. I'll try and finish the rest off over the upcoming week. --
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 19:28, 22 April 2018 (UTC)reply
Sorry
MWright96 if you feel like I've been going to slowly with this. I can understand if you decide to fail this considering that I have not implemented all your suggestions in over a week. Not been able to dedicate that much time and concentration to Wikipedia recently due to personal issues. Thanks for your work here, but I can't imagine that I will get this done before the weekend and will accept whatever decision you make.
Emir of Wikipedia (
talk) 20:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)reply
@
Emir of Wikipedia: I will give you all the time that you need to complete this article and will only consider failing it if the remaining issues cannot be addressed.
MWright96(talk) 14:53, 5 May 2018 (UTC)reply
Unfortunately, since the nominator is inactive and unable to correct the remaining issues, I have taken the decision to fail this nomination. The article itself has potential to attain GA status and can be re-nominated in the future.
MWright96(talk) 16:23, 12 May 2018 (UTC)reply