This article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow, this article is..... flawed.
This edit is at best Original Research (read the No Original Research article if you're unfamiliar with this) and at worst a blatant opinion piece (see Neutral Point of View, which this totally violated). Regardless of whether you agree with the opinion/research expressed in it, this goes against two of the fundamental rules of Wikipedia.
Even after reverting that, there are major problems with neutrality.
An "interview with student Jarred Tackett was considered too shocking to be shown in newspapers or on tv"? Sounds like a lame excuse to sneak in his rant under the guise of unpublished material; there's no reference or source given. And most of the article is given over to this guy's opinion; comes across like an attempt to weasel past the NPOV criteria under the pretense of reasonable quotation.
The closing sentence is
Why the quotes around 'experts'? It looks like scepticism against their credibility (i.e. "so-called 'experts'" weasel words), and the whole sentence reads like more original research anyway.
The article includes some supposed references, but it's unclear which parts they are referring to, and it doesn't excuse the blatant bias.
I'd have broken the article's single paragraph up into smaller sub-paragraphs, but there's no point; this article would be better rewritten from scratch.
Fourohfour 14:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
This article has has been edited for Cleanup/Maintenance by Upsidedown Keyboard ( talk · contribs). This talk page section is a list of changes that where done as a result of this maintenance. |
This article edited on 17:49, 12 July 2017 ( UTC) for Dead external link cleanup, Archiving of alive links to prevent Link rot.
You can view the full Difference between revisions here.
Fixed infobox school errors:
Dead link fixes:
Thank you for helping Wikipedia,
Upsidedown Keyboard ( talk) 17:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on 3 August 2007. The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wow, this article is..... flawed.
This edit is at best Original Research (read the No Original Research article if you're unfamiliar with this) and at worst a blatant opinion piece (see Neutral Point of View, which this totally violated). Regardless of whether you agree with the opinion/research expressed in it, this goes against two of the fundamental rules of Wikipedia.
Even after reverting that, there are major problems with neutrality.
An "interview with student Jarred Tackett was considered too shocking to be shown in newspapers or on tv"? Sounds like a lame excuse to sneak in his rant under the guise of unpublished material; there's no reference or source given. And most of the article is given over to this guy's opinion; comes across like an attempt to weasel past the NPOV criteria under the pretense of reasonable quotation.
The closing sentence is
Why the quotes around 'experts'? It looks like scepticism against their credibility (i.e. "so-called 'experts'" weasel words), and the whole sentence reads like more original research anyway.
The article includes some supposed references, but it's unclear which parts they are referring to, and it doesn't excuse the blatant bias.
I'd have broken the article's single paragraph up into smaller sub-paragraphs, but there's no point; this article would be better rewritten from scratch.
Fourohfour 14:42, 26 December 2006 (UTC)
This article has has been edited for Cleanup/Maintenance by Upsidedown Keyboard ( talk · contribs). This talk page section is a list of changes that where done as a result of this maintenance. |
This article edited on 17:49, 12 July 2017 ( UTC) for Dead external link cleanup, Archiving of alive links to prevent Link rot.
You can view the full Difference between revisions here.
Fixed infobox school errors:
Dead link fixes:
Thank you for helping Wikipedia,
Upsidedown Keyboard ( talk) 17:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)