![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
"After P2P software and instant messaging, it's internet browsers' turn to allow content sharing." This is totally a personal opinion.
The article should be completely cleaned up. -- 71.163.74.162 01:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Marked as stub. Needs WAY more content. -- ALIENDUDE5300 23:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Added Links to Other Articles on Wikipedia. ALIENDUDE5300 02:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
i removed a ton of cruft and ad-like prose (like linking allpeers to its website at every mention of the word 'AllPeers'). trimmed the linkfarm at the end in accordance with WP:EL. also not that wikipedia is not a blog - we don't need the blow by blow for each version featurette. it now reads like an article instead of a product-push. JoeSmack Talk( p-review!) 07:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Note that the "screenshot" is actually a capture of our website. What's more, it's a page from our private beta that doesn't exist anymore. I'll try to get someone here to deal with it. comment added by 80.95.104.81 ( [1] attributed by Widefox 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC))
I noticed the re-added the Future Development Section; I removed it because of WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until these things are added they should stay out of an article. JoeSmack Talk( p-review!) 22:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Many problems - mostly fixed.... I'm concerned about WP:COI, WP:NPOV
inetnum: 80.95.104.80 - 80.95.104.83 netname: BN-JANODVARKO-NET descr: Jan Odvarko descr: Praha descr: Czech Republic I would be much happier if those affiliated to AllPeers signin and let it be known of the potential conflict.
I added back the Firefox TOC - please do not remove - it allows navigation, and is on all Firefox extensions. The problem with layout is fixed. The main problem is the article - it is a stub. It is also an advert, without a single reference. Closed source proprietary is not Free Software - removed. The image was not a screenshot - commented out until a real screenshot is put in. Widefox 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm affiliated with AllPeers. I'd rather leave it to the user community to edit this page as they wish, but I would like to know at least what we would have to do to get the "this is an advertisement" message off the article. What about it makes it read like an ad to you (note that as far as I know no one affiliated with AllPeers has contributed anything substantial to the article)? What kind of references do you want? I will also get someone to put up a proper screenshot. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plasticmillion ( talk • contribs).
Note that as of today, AllPeers is open source (see http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/03/07/allpeers-goes-open-source/ for more information).
I removed the {p2pclient} template but maybe some could add this to Comparison_of_file_sharing_applications. But form this article is am not sure if this is a anonymous application (like freenet) or just bittorrent with Protocol obfuscation (not anonymous) : Leuk he 09:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Note that we released version 0.70 a few weeks ago, and in fact version 0.70.1 came out last week. The big news is that the software now adds support for standard BitTorrent downloads to Firefox. This makes downloading BitTorrent files as easy as downloading normal files from the web (sorry, I sound like a marketing guy, but this is the discussion page after all). Here's a good up-to-date reference: http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3699316 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.95.104.81 ( talk) 11:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
|
"After P2P software and instant messaging, it's internet browsers' turn to allow content sharing." This is totally a personal opinion.
The article should be completely cleaned up. -- 71.163.74.162 01:24, 8 September 2006 (UTC)
Marked as stub. Needs WAY more content. -- ALIENDUDE5300 23:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Added Links to Other Articles on Wikipedia. ALIENDUDE5300 02:22, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
i removed a ton of cruft and ad-like prose (like linking allpeers to its website at every mention of the word 'AllPeers'). trimmed the linkfarm at the end in accordance with WP:EL. also not that wikipedia is not a blog - we don't need the blow by blow for each version featurette. it now reads like an article instead of a product-push. JoeSmack Talk( p-review!) 07:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Note that the "screenshot" is actually a capture of our website. What's more, it's a page from our private beta that doesn't exist anymore. I'll try to get someone here to deal with it. comment added by 80.95.104.81 ( [1] attributed by Widefox 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC))
I noticed the re-added the Future Development Section; I removed it because of WP:NOT - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Until these things are added they should stay out of an article. JoeSmack Talk( p-review!) 22:26, 5 November 2006 (UTC)
Many problems - mostly fixed.... I'm concerned about WP:COI, WP:NPOV
inetnum: 80.95.104.80 - 80.95.104.83 netname: BN-JANODVARKO-NET descr: Jan Odvarko descr: Praha descr: Czech Republic I would be much happier if those affiliated to AllPeers signin and let it be known of the potential conflict.
I added back the Firefox TOC - please do not remove - it allows navigation, and is on all Firefox extensions. The problem with layout is fixed. The main problem is the article - it is a stub. It is also an advert, without a single reference. Closed source proprietary is not Free Software - removed. The image was not a screenshot - commented out until a real screenshot is put in. Widefox 15:26, 7 November 2006 (UTC)
I'm affiliated with AllPeers. I'd rather leave it to the user community to edit this page as they wish, but I would like to know at least what we would have to do to get the "this is an advertisement" message off the article. What about it makes it read like an ad to you (note that as far as I know no one affiliated with AllPeers has contributed anything substantial to the article)? What kind of references do you want? I will also get someone to put up a proper screenshot. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Plasticmillion ( talk • contribs).
Note that as of today, AllPeers is open source (see http://www.allpeers.com/blog/2007/03/07/allpeers-goes-open-source/ for more information).
I removed the {p2pclient} template but maybe some could add this to Comparison_of_file_sharing_applications. But form this article is am not sure if this is a anonymous application (like freenet) or just bittorrent with Protocol obfuscation (not anonymous) : Leuk he 09:17, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
Note that we released version 0.70 a few weeks ago, and in fact version 0.70.1 came out last week. The big news is that the software now adds support for standard BitTorrent downloads to Firefox. This makes downloading BitTorrent files as easy as downloading normal files from the web (sorry, I sound like a marketing guy, but this is the discussion page after all). Here's a good up-to-date reference: http://www.internetnews.com/xSP/article.php/3699316 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.95.104.81 ( talk) 11:54, 22 October 2007 (UTC)