Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
I added the neutrality flag as this reads like promotional literature to me - due to use of descriptors like "high-quality" and subtle digs at other organizations. Happy to discuss further! - Sara FB ( talk) 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm new to talk pages, so if I' editing the wrong thing, please put me straight. I removed the word dodgy from the business model description, as I felt is was uncalled for. Many organizations contribute content for free to the OCW movement, and this makes neither the OCW foundation, nor such august organizations as MIT or Stanford dodgy. Laurence Cuffe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurence Cuffe ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello. I was requested to edit the article. I admit that there is a merit of conflict of interest here, but I would like to ask to review the update first before reverting it entirely or partially. Reverting for something due to conflict of interest is tantamount to disregarding the objectivity of the update, and a right to due process.-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A •t a l k• 13:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I haved fixed the formatting of your good-faith request (new requests need a new request template), but will leave the actual review to a new uninvolved editor. GermanJoe ( talk) 17:19, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I would like to request changes to the article in the following sections:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Renzoy16 ( talk • contribs) 17:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
cite magazine}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
.Regards Spintendo 18:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
References
May I add these information up from that currently present in the said section?
Extended content
|
---|
References
|
-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A •t a l k• 06:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request. Also note that future requests ought to involve the use of a new template placed at the location of the new request. Older templates should not be altered.
Spintendo
08:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Proposal review 26-JAN-2019
|
---|
|
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Extended content
|
---|
Request adding of content in the reception section:
References
|
Regards, Spintendo 02:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Notes
Ah, you're referring to Alison.com. It's an online learning platform that offers a wide range of courses, They provide education in various fields such as business, technology, health, and more.for more information click here:
https://alison.com/?utm_source=alison_user&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_campaign=31848396
Ababa1845 (
talk)
22:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
I added the neutrality flag as this reads like promotional literature to me - due to use of descriptors like "high-quality" and subtle digs at other organizations. Happy to discuss further! - Sara FB ( talk) 18:44, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm new to talk pages, so if I' editing the wrong thing, please put me straight. I removed the word dodgy from the business model description, as I felt is was uncalled for. Many organizations contribute content for free to the OCW movement, and this makes neither the OCW foundation, nor such august organizations as MIT or Stanford dodgy. Laurence Cuffe — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laurence Cuffe ( talk • contribs) 20:11, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Part of an edit requested by an editor with a conflict of interest has been implemented. |
Hello. I was requested to edit the article. I admit that there is a merit of conflict of interest here, but I would like to ask to review the update first before reverting it entirely or partially. Reverting for something due to conflict of interest is tantamount to disregarding the objectivity of the update, and a right to due process.-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A •t a l k• 13:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
I haved fixed the formatting of your good-faith request (new requests need a new request template), but will leave the actual review to a new uninvolved editor. GermanJoe ( talk) 17:19, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
I would like to request changes to the article in the following sections:
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Renzoy16 ( talk • contribs) 17:07, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
References
{{
cite magazine}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher=
(
help)
{{
request edit}}
template's answer parameter to read from |ans=yes
to |ans=no
.Regards Spintendo 18:33, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
References
May I add these information up from that currently present in the said section?
Extended content
|
---|
References
|
-- AR E N Z O Y 1 6A •t a l k• 06:31, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Below you will see where proposals from your request have been quoted with reviewer decisions and feedback inserted underneath, either accepting, declining or otherwise commenting upon your proposal(s). Please read the enclosed notes within the proposal review section below for information on each request. Also note that future requests ought to involve the use of a new template placed at the location of the new request. Older templates should not be altered.
Spintendo
08:27, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Proposal review 26-JAN-2019
|
---|
|
This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. |
Extended content
|
---|
Request adding of content in the reception section:
References
|
Regards, Spintendo 02:57, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Notes
Ah, you're referring to Alison.com. It's an online learning platform that offers a wide range of courses, They provide education in various fields such as business, technology, health, and more.for more information click here:
https://alison.com/?utm_source=alison_user&utm_medium=affiliates&utm_campaign=31848396
Ababa1845 (
talk)
22:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)