![]() | Alfriston Market Cross has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 9, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) guidelines suggest ‘Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability’.
Grade I listed buildings in England are, by definition, of exceptional architectural and historic interest; they are covered by their entry on the National Heritage List for England (NHLE), and are usually covered in The Buildings of England – both ‘reliable, third-party sources’.
Grade I listed buildings therefore meet the notability criteria for buildings and should each be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article; and Alfriston Market Cross is a Grade I listed building. Topo122 ( talk) 12:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 14:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
3. Broad in coverage
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrated if possible
Lead - The lead should provide a summary of the contents of the article, so it would be appropriate to give a brief summary of the market cross' history in the lead. Also, the listed building status is not mentioned in the rest of the article, and it probably should be.
Infobox - The Listed Building designation date is not cited in the article text or the infobox.
History - "It is likely the market cross was erected around the time the charter was granted." - Citation needed
So drunken Canadians (in specific) vandalized the monument during both World Wars?
We don't have a mention of it being listed as a Listed Building in the article text, this would probably be desirable.
That's all, it looks like. Great job! Hog Farm ( talk) 14:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Destruction and restoration of the market cross, 1955-56 - "Alfriston Parish Council decided to restore the cross once again" - I speak American English, which would use "The Alfriston Parish Council". However, this article should definitely use British English. Is the exclusion of the article "the" in this case standard BE usage?
The Ship of Theseus paradox - "In the metaphysics of identity, the Ship of Theseus is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an object that has had all its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object." - We need a citation for this, the paradox is not common knowledge.
Pinging nominator, @ Topo122:. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Alfriston Market Cross has been listed as one of the
Geography and places good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: February 9, 2020. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features) guidelines suggest ‘Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments, may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability’.
Grade I listed buildings in England are, by definition, of exceptional architectural and historic interest; they are covered by their entry on the National Heritage List for England (NHLE), and are usually covered in The Buildings of England – both ‘reliable, third-party sources’.
Grade I listed buildings therefore meet the notability criteria for buildings and should each be the subject of a separate Wikipedia article; and Alfriston Market Cross is a Grade I listed building. Topo122 ( talk) 12:42, 31 January 2020 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Hog Farm ( talk · contribs) 14:12, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
1. Well-written
2. Verifiable
3. Broad in coverage
4. Neutral
5. Stable
6. Illustrated if possible
Lead - The lead should provide a summary of the contents of the article, so it would be appropriate to give a brief summary of the market cross' history in the lead. Also, the listed building status is not mentioned in the rest of the article, and it probably should be.
Infobox - The Listed Building designation date is not cited in the article text or the infobox.
History - "It is likely the market cross was erected around the time the charter was granted." - Citation needed
So drunken Canadians (in specific) vandalized the monument during both World Wars?
We don't have a mention of it being listed as a Listed Building in the article text, this would probably be desirable.
That's all, it looks like. Great job! Hog Farm ( talk) 14:57, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Destruction and restoration of the market cross, 1955-56 - "Alfriston Parish Council decided to restore the cross once again" - I speak American English, which would use "The Alfriston Parish Council". However, this article should definitely use British English. Is the exclusion of the article "the" in this case standard BE usage?
The Ship of Theseus paradox - "In the metaphysics of identity, the Ship of Theseus is a thought experiment that raises the question of whether an object that has had all its components replaced remains fundamentally the same object." - We need a citation for this, the paradox is not common knowledge.
Pinging nominator, @ Topo122:. Hog Farm ( talk) 20:54, 8 February 2020 (UTC)