This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sussex Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sussex, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sussex on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SussexWikipedia:WikiProject SussexTemplate:WikiProject SussexSussex-related articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Museums Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The article tells us a lot about the origins of the National trust, but not that much about the house. And the English Heritage link does not work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.17.36.33 ( talk) 10:33, 17 October 2018 (UTC) reply

The link marked "English Heritage" was misdescribed and pointed at a mirror site, Heritage Gateway. I've removd the link as irrelevant. The Historic England links work. Murgatroyd49 ( talk) 14:21, 17 October 2018 (UTC) reply

Hello! During late June, July and some of August, I'm working on a paid project sponsored by the National Trust to review and enhance coverage of NT sites. You can find the pilot edits here, as well as a statement and contact details for the National Trust. I am leaving this message when I make a first edit to a page; please do get in touch if you have any concerns. Lajmmoore ( talk) 08:02, 4 July 2022 (UTC) reply