This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written as a resume instead of a biographical note.
I have some suggestions that I would like to discuss before editing.
The first part of the page reads like a resume for an academic job offer. I think too much of the same is said, I would suggest one line removed:
"Grant examines the process of writing and ideas based in linguistic theory as it connects to art and creates visual images inspired by text and collaborative group installations based on that process.[3] "
Also the list with selected exhibitions, awards and collections, even though appealing for a resume or the "bio" section of a personal website, seem a bit too extended.
Clearwater48 ( talk) 13:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Clearwater48 Clearwater48 ( talk) 13:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This is something that definitely belongs in a biography, however it should be added in a "Controversies" or "Legal issues" section by an editor who can word out a legal issue.
If anyone is interested, here is the gov link of the suit: http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91193555
Clearwater48 ( talk) 17:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Clearwater48 Clearwater48 ( talk) 17:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Please read the following article if you need help understanding what makes a reliable source /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Potentially_unreliable_sources
Gossip about relationships from paid content publications are genarally not considered ideal wikipedia source material Clearwater48
My opinion on this entry is that since there is no personal announcement and the articles cited make third person reference to it, it needed to be changed. Attacking me because my entries may remind you of other peoples entries is apart from absurd, also disheartening and against what this website represents. Clearwater48
Those articles about the “relationship” are actually paid PR articles by Alexandra. People, Elle, Vogue, to name a few, are known PR magazines. They are no longer known for being reliable for quite a while. Keanu nor Alexandra have confirmed anything. Therefore shouldn’t be put up on either of their pages that they are in a relationship. The Meg reference is false too since it wasn’t her that said that. Someone else did and was told to for PR reasons.
Agree with you Clearwater48 Stormriders09 ( talk)
Yes, it’s paid for. No, it is not hogwash, totally ridiculous or complete nonsense. Doesn’t take much research to find this out or can easily talk with people that work in PR. They are more than happy to tell people how it all works. Apparently not many do research anymore. Stormriders09 ( talk) 21:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the birthdate as there is no source backing it up. 2600:100C:A21A:B5A1:C129:FA75:F9E9:DE72 ( talk) 23:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is written as a resume instead of a biographical note.
I have some suggestions that I would like to discuss before editing.
The first part of the page reads like a resume for an academic job offer. I think too much of the same is said, I would suggest one line removed:
"Grant examines the process of writing and ideas based in linguistic theory as it connects to art and creates visual images inspired by text and collaborative group installations based on that process.[3] "
Also the list with selected exhibitions, awards and collections, even though appealing for a resume or the "bio" section of a personal website, seem a bit too extended.
Clearwater48 ( talk) 13:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Clearwater48 Clearwater48 ( talk) 13:51, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
This is something that definitely belongs in a biography, however it should be added in a "Controversies" or "Legal issues" section by an editor who can word out a legal issue.
If anyone is interested, here is the gov link of the suit: http://ttabvue.uspto.gov/ttabvue/v?pno=91193555
Clearwater48 ( talk) 17:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)Clearwater48 Clearwater48 ( talk) 17:01, 24 November 2019 (UTC)
Please read the following article if you need help understanding what makes a reliable source /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Potentially_unreliable_sources
Gossip about relationships from paid content publications are genarally not considered ideal wikipedia source material Clearwater48
My opinion on this entry is that since there is no personal announcement and the articles cited make third person reference to it, it needed to be changed. Attacking me because my entries may remind you of other peoples entries is apart from absurd, also disheartening and against what this website represents. Clearwater48
Those articles about the “relationship” are actually paid PR articles by Alexandra. People, Elle, Vogue, to name a few, are known PR magazines. They are no longer known for being reliable for quite a while. Keanu nor Alexandra have confirmed anything. Therefore shouldn’t be put up on either of their pages that they are in a relationship. The Meg reference is false too since it wasn’t her that said that. Someone else did and was told to for PR reasons.
Agree with you Clearwater48 Stormriders09 ( talk)
Yes, it’s paid for. No, it is not hogwash, totally ridiculous or complete nonsense. Doesn’t take much research to find this out or can easily talk with people that work in PR. They are more than happy to tell people how it all works. Apparently not many do research anymore. Stormriders09 ( talk) 21:21, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This
edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please remove the birthdate as there is no source backing it up. 2600:100C:A21A:B5A1:C129:FA75:F9E9:DE72 ( talk) 23:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)