The contents of the Nativitas et victoria Alexandri Magni regis page were merged into Alexander Romance on 20 March 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Be kind of nice if this sited a source, wouldn't it?
Or even if it cited one. 69.216.117.174 07:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I have modified this page, moved it, and plastered it with redlinks. All the redlinks concern topics about which there is more than sufficient secondary literature for decent encyclopaedia articles. They ought to be created eventually. Note de:Alexanderlied and es:Libro de Alexandre. Srnec ( talk) 05:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC) (I will work on this as I can, to remove redlinks etc.)
I argue that "Alexander romance" is a genre not a single work. The story carried by each of the many, many versions is hardly the same! They are different stories. "Alexander romance" is like "Arthurian romance". Both the Britannica and the Cambridge Companion to Medieval Romance agree with me, on my reading and on capitalisation. The Medieval Alexander Project seems to also (see this). I have also come across plenty of uses of the indefinite article before "Alexander romance(s)". All this indicates to me that italics and capitalisation convey the wrong message. Srnec ( talk) 21:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Someone (probably a muslim writer) wrote the suggestion that the quranic version must be independent from the Alexander Romance because this shows knowledge of later incidences suggesting that the quranic version is older. This is wrong. I deleted this sentences and inserted the corresponding parts from here, providing facts that the opposite is much more likely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great_in_the_Qur'an — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Greed ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alexander romance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Should be implemented in the article.
80.131.50.210 ( talk) 03:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
“The Syriac Alexander Legend has been found to closely resemble the story of Dhu al-Qarnayn in the Qur'an (see Alexander the Great in the Quran).“
I’m not sure if I’m missing something, but from reading the article that Wikipedia linked here, I could not find anything about the Syriac Alexander Legend demonstrating comparison to the Quran besides one paragraph that mentions scholarship stating the exact opposite of what the quote claims. Could someone clarify? Mohalibou ( talk) 05:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)
The contents of the Nativitas et victoria Alexandri Magni regis page were merged into Alexander Romance on 20 March 2024. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Be kind of nice if this sited a source, wouldn't it?
Or even if it cited one. 69.216.117.174 07:49, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
I have modified this page, moved it, and plastered it with redlinks. All the redlinks concern topics about which there is more than sufficient secondary literature for decent encyclopaedia articles. They ought to be created eventually. Note de:Alexanderlied and es:Libro de Alexandre. Srnec ( talk) 05:42, 24 May 2008 (UTC) (I will work on this as I can, to remove redlinks etc.)
I argue that "Alexander romance" is a genre not a single work. The story carried by each of the many, many versions is hardly the same! They are different stories. "Alexander romance" is like "Arthurian romance". Both the Britannica and the Cambridge Companion to Medieval Romance agree with me, on my reading and on capitalisation. The Medieval Alexander Project seems to also (see this). I have also come across plenty of uses of the indefinite article before "Alexander romance(s)". All this indicates to me that italics and capitalisation convey the wrong message. Srnec ( talk) 21:41, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
Someone (probably a muslim writer) wrote the suggestion that the quranic version must be independent from the Alexander Romance because this shows knowledge of later incidences suggesting that the quranic version is older. This is wrong. I deleted this sentences and inserted the corresponding parts from here, providing facts that the opposite is much more likely: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_the_Great_in_the_Qur'an — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Greed ( talk • contribs) 08:25, 7 September 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alexander romance. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 00:39, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Should be implemented in the article.
80.131.50.210 ( talk) 03:03, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
“The Syriac Alexander Legend has been found to closely resemble the story of Dhu al-Qarnayn in the Qur'an (see Alexander the Great in the Quran).“
I’m not sure if I’m missing something, but from reading the article that Wikipedia linked here, I could not find anything about the Syriac Alexander Legend demonstrating comparison to the Quran besides one paragraph that mentions scholarship stating the exact opposite of what the quote claims. Could someone clarify? Mohalibou ( talk) 05:30, 4 December 2021 (UTC)