From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coatrack?

Only a few paragraphs are about the nominal topic. The rest of the article is a biography of Alex Kurtagić. If he's notable then it should be split off, or the whole article moved to a biographical name. If not, it should just be deleted. See WP:COATRACK.   Will Beback  talk  12:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

I think it should have a separate article. 94.171.140.213 ( talk) 17:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC) reply
After looking at it further I just flipped the topic to Kurtagić with the label as a subsection. If anyone thinks it's really notable enough for a separate article it could be spun-off, but the lack of sources for that section may indicate a lack of notability.   Will Beback  talk  08:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Complete reworking of the article

I removed huge slices because of the criticism concerning the primary sources - but I'm sure it would be worthwhile to re-add large parts of it after a critical examination. All info which is now included has proper sources.
Regards, 87.150.246.96 ( talk) 22:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No. Metal Archives can’t be trusted (e. g.: user generated content and false information), see de:Diskussion:Corrupted#Bearbeitungen. -- 217/ 83 23:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
D'Accord. 87.150.255.113 ( talk) 15:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

mark for deletion

this subject is not notable enough for an article Fohnicus ( talk) 15:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Coatrack?

Only a few paragraphs are about the nominal topic. The rest of the article is a biography of Alex Kurtagić. If he's notable then it should be split off, or the whole article moved to a biographical name. If not, it should just be deleted. See WP:COATRACK.   Will Beback  talk  12:25, 11 May 2011 (UTC) reply

I think it should have a separate article. 94.171.140.213 ( talk) 17:22, 13 May 2011 (UTC) reply
After looking at it further I just flipped the topic to Kurtagić with the label as a subsection. If anyone thinks it's really notable enough for a separate article it could be spun-off, but the lack of sources for that section may indicate a lack of notability.   Will Beback  talk  08:54, 14 May 2011 (UTC) reply

Complete reworking of the article

I removed huge slices because of the criticism concerning the primary sources - but I'm sure it would be worthwhile to re-add large parts of it after a critical examination. All info which is now included has proper sources.
Regards, 87.150.246.96 ( talk) 22:46, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply

No. Metal Archives can’t be trusted (e. g.: user generated content and false information), see de:Diskussion:Corrupted#Bearbeitungen. -- 217/ 83 23:58, 20 February 2012 (UTC) reply
D'Accord. 87.150.255.113 ( talk) 15:44, 21 February 2012 (UTC) reply

mark for deletion

this subject is not notable enough for an article Fohnicus ( talk) 15:15, 18 June 2024 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook