The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 03:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, i'll review this. I'll be using my 7-day Review Process to schedule a verdict on May 22, 2012. -- Hahc21 ( talk) 03:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Day 1:An overall analysis of the article. The first day, the article is read two or more times to identify:
I've fixed an external link that was dead. Also, made some minor changes on the article, mostly on code rather than words. I've read it a lot (more than 10 times) and scanned the references 2 times. So, i don't see any other issue to be fixed. Basilisk4u has done a very good work on the article :) -- Hahc21 ( talk) 00:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Nothing else to note after a comprehensive read. We're close to the end of the review, i think. -- Hahc21 [ TALK][ CONTRIBS 22:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
I almost forgot to write it.. Sorry haha XD
Final comments: Good job by Basilisk4u ( talk · contribs), Just minor fixes were needed to get this article up to GA status. Well done. -- Hahc21 [ TALK][ CONTRIBS 18:00, 23 May 2012 (UTC)
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Hahc21 ( talk · contribs) 03:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Ok, i'll review this. I'll be using my 7-day Review Process to schedule a verdict on May 22, 2012. -- Hahc21 ( talk) 03:50, 16 May 2012 (UTC)
Day 1:An overall analysis of the article. The first day, the article is read two or more times to identify:
I've fixed an external link that was dead. Also, made some minor changes on the article, mostly on code rather than words. I've read it a lot (more than 10 times) and scanned the references 2 times. So, i don't see any other issue to be fixed. Basilisk4u has done a very good work on the article :) -- Hahc21 ( talk) 00:41, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
Nothing else to note after a comprehensive read. We're close to the end of the review, i think. -- Hahc21 [ TALK][ CONTRIBS 22:18, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
I almost forgot to write it.. Sorry haha XD
Final comments: Good job by Basilisk4u ( talk · contribs), Just minor fixes were needed to get this article up to GA status. Well done. -- Hahc21 [ TALK][ CONTRIBS 18:00, 23 May 2012 (UTC)