![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Uh, I tried to make the page not so much badly written by attempting to delete the italics, but it's not working, so help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.192.9.98 ( talk) 03:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Do we have a source for this? I haven't seen one. So far the best is reference to a video being made and that is from the error in every article unreliable
Sun bizarre column.
SunCreator (
talk)
14:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
--- I agree, this doesn't have reliable sources, "the sun" is a tabloid and not a very reliable one at that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.228.139.26 ( talk) 20:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Is this a single or song? If it's a single do we have a WP:RS and if not which is the appropriate template to use? Initially it was Template:Infobox song but since then it's become Template:Infobox single. SunCreator ( talk) 15:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Do we have any source for the order of the singles? Obvious Bad Romance has been release and Telephone is next. Whatever is next has not been stated to my knowledge. Does anyone have a source for this? SunCreator ( talk) 23:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
There is no reliable source for the single cover. But the cover that was previously posted is the actual cover. iTunes UK has removed the download, so it unfortunately can't be a source. Can anyone find an official source so the cover can be reposted? -- Sdoo493 ( talk) 20:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hehe sorry to bug you guys but he's correct, that IS in fact the cover for the promotional single. You know the one you got rid of? And yes, it is indeed the third single. -- Jess28 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.32.120 ( talk) 04:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
All Access has posted "Alejandro" on their new singles page. Is this a reliable source? It also has been getting radio airplay. -- Sdoo493 ( talk) 21:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
You aren't a smart one are you Legolas? I've heard it on the radio a lot!!!! - Jess28 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.32.120 ( talk) 23:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
It has been confirmed as single ,here's the reference http://thatgrapejuice.net/2010/03/lady-gaga-confirms-single/ -- 91.187.103.42 ( talk) 10:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
In January 2010, it was reported that Gaga was holding casting calls for the music video for "Alejandro" and was eager for David Walliams to appear in the video alongside his fiancee Lara Stone. [20][21]
Digital Spy and The Sun are listed as sources. They are not reliable at all. That info is fake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirillgdaily ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Lady Gaga confirmed today that the music video is going to be shot soon and will not be the continuation of Telephone. I think this is worth putting into the article. http://gagadaily.com/2010/03/new-lady-gaga-radio-interviews-5/ -- Leporella ( talk) 14:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/03/will_steven_klein_do_lady_gaga.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluedrago197 ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Gaga was interviewed by Australian radio station Nova 96.9, where she talked about the music video. She said "I'm so excited about the 'Alejandro' video,[...]Actually, we're shooting it very soon and I don't want to say who the director is yet because it's going to give a lot away.[...]Are you absolutely mad? I would never, ever tell you![about the concept of the video] I would be more likely to lie through my teeth to you [regarding] what the video's about so that you could all be surprised. But I will tell you it's not the sequel to the 'Telephone' video". I have two theories about the 'Alejandro' video.Ones that 'Teeth' will be released as the 4th single and she will fuse the two videos together(similar to 'Imma Be' and 'Rock That Body' by the Black Eyed Peas.). The other is that she said she would lie through her teeth about the concept. She then said that the video will not be the sequel to 'Telephone', meaning she might've just lied right thier! She did not say who the director is because it might be Jonas Akerland , who directed the 'Paparazzi' and 'Telephone' videos.Well, I just can't wait until the video premieres!-- RebornRocks ( talk) 11:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Someone please delete or revert this article back to the "Other Songs" category.
"The Sun" is not a reliable source. Someone please get rid of this ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.91.144.123 ( talk) 18:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
-- That's a promotional single, just like "Dance In The Dark". Before the "The Fame Monster" was released both "Dance In The Dark" and "Alejandro" were released as promo singles. That article is for an iTunes page that is for the promo single and it isn't even in the US or Canada. It doesn't prove anything. This article needs to be reverted to the promo single or other songs format. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
72.91.144.123 (
talk)
20:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Singles get music videos, not songs. Why are you so reluctant to say this is a single, no one has said it's not a single yet people have said it is. 206.45.0.225 ( talk) 22:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
--
iTunes Sweden shows selling it as a "SINGLE". Is that reliable?— Iknow23 ( talk) 02:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I removed the itunes sweden date...shall i add it back?.....it was just for promo purposes....we all knew that in February "Telephone" was announced as the second single..... Charleysgrilledsubs ( talk) 16:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
--
{{editsemiprotected}}
Please change: "The song has a basic sequence of Bm–D–F♯m–Bm–D–F♯m as its chord progression." to "The song verse has a basic sequence of Bm–D–F♯m–Bm–D–F♯m as its chord progression." because the current statement implies that the entire song has the given chord sequence, which is not the case. Only the verse has that chord sequence; the chorus has a different sequence. Anyone with knowledge of music theory can testify to this, though the (transposed) chords on this tab
[2] show that the chord sequence does, in fact, change in the chorus.
129.63.2.70 (
talk)
21:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Done Thanks! If you would like to clarify further, just open another request.
Celestra (
talk)
22:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Don't know if this is where to put this but: "A quarrel then arose between Gaga and her label where "Alejandro" was ultimately choose to be released." "choose" should read 'chosen'. I would also suggest that "where" be replaced with '...and her label, the outcome of which was that "Alejandro"...' 124.187.144.5 ( talk) 11:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Gagadaily, is Lady Gaga's biggest fansite also featured on her official website. The creator confirmed that the Alejandro music video will be shot during the end of April due to business. Gagadaily is a reliable source and Gaga herself also keeps in touch with them, and gives them exclusive news. Please add this new music video information to the Music Video section. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WorldFantasia ( talk • contribs) 09:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Lady Gaga has reached a new peak in Canada. It has jumped 28 spots to number 50 on the April 10 archive of Billboard Canadian 100. http://www.billboard.com/charts/canadian-hot-100#/charts/canadian-hot-100?begin=41&order=position —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.80.60 ( talk) 14:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Number 8 in Australian Aria Charts on 12/4/2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.23.38 ( talk) 07:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Debuts this week in New Zealand at 35 [www.rianz.org.nz] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.175.76 ( talk) 12:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Jumps to 28 this week, same source as above in New Zealand.
{{editsemiprotected}}
Lady Gaga is going to be performing Alejandro on American Idol. She confirmed it on Twitter.
WorldFantasia ( talk) 12:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Not done: Welcome. Twitter is not a reliable source. Please provide a relaible source and the exact text you would like to have inserted. Thanks,
Celestra (
talk)
13:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Well, since to Wikipedia Gagadaily.com and Twitter are not reliable, what can I do. Anyway, Gaga performed Alejandro at a charity in Japan April 18th. Watch the video of her on youtube. She also sang Speechless and Bad Romance.
WorldFantasia ( talk) 13:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
http://www.billboard.com/#/charts/hot-100?begin=21&order=position position 28 ... it needs changing ... canadian hot 100 16 —Preceding unsigned comment added by AriandaGAGA ( talk • contribs) 11:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
canadian hot 100 16 not 22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by AriandaGAGA ( talk • contribs) 12:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
We need some real sources for the ABBA and Ace of Base allusions. The current sources only lead to a blog writer's speculation. Can we get some sources where Lady Gaga herself confirms this? I did a google search, and I have not found anything more than fan speculation. 75.164.34.162 ( talk) 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I would agree that this should be removed. I personally can hear only passing similarities. - Tris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.144.5 ( talk) 11:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. Those "sources" (I use that term VERY loosely) don't even include quotes from her. I think they should all be removed. Also, the entire "Composition" section is completely wrong. The only thing correct about it is the part about Csardas. And the correct time signature is actually 99 BPM, not 80. I picked this song apart in FL Studio, and I can tell you straight-up that the time signature is 99. Cheers. 75.164.109.82 ( talk) 07:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
The sentence "Gaga said that the inspiration behind "Alejandro" was her "Fear of Sex Monster" and the basic meaning behind the song is about "falling in love with your best friend", Alejandro being her friend in the song" has this as a source. The only thing that page says is "LADY GAGA TAKES OVER FUSE! 2 more days of non-stop GAGA on tap. Monday, January 25th from 11AM to 6AM Programs: Lady Gaga: On The Record with Fuse (30 min), The Lady Gaga Chronicles (30 min), Loaded: Lady Gaga. Monday, February 15th from 11AM to 6AM Programs: Lady Gaga: On The Record with Fuse (30 min), The Lady Gaga Chronicles (30 min), Loaded: Lady Gaga". 75.164.33.189 ( talk) 04:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
There are plenty of remixes of Alejandro available, and I think we should mention them. Here's the list of remixes that I know of:
Bimbo Jones Club Mix - 6:41
Bimbo Jones Radio Edit - 2:47
DJ Dark Intensity Remix - 4:41
Sound of the Arrows Remix - 3:58
Extended X-Mix - 5:14
NenoMix Tribal Remix - 6:38
DJ Juanje Remix - 4:38
SkuLL Edit - 4:11
Daddy San Mix - 5:15
Nek's Mix - 3:43
That's all I have, but I think we should add them to the article. There is a rumor about a Moto Blanco remix & a Skrillex Remix, but we certainly should wait until it's official.
LOLMFAOROTFL (
talk)
21:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
The time signature mentioned in the article is for the SHEET MUSIC, not the actual song. 75.164.99.90 ( talk) 02:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
I know that the remix ep may be official, but I think that listing Amazon has the reliable source for it should be removed. Gaga's site has not announced the release in her discography on her site (however usually they advertise around a month ahead). Amazon are also known for posting "Bootlegs" in her official discography as well. Look Here: [http://www.amazon.com/Lady-Gaga/e/B001LH2W8E/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1273486737&sr=8-1] [http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lady-Gaga/e/B001LH2W8E/ref=s9_k2ah_gw_al1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-1&pf_rd_r=07FAK5J2X1XMFWA60QSS&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=467198433&pf_rd_i=468294#]. These are examples of the Lady Gaga "xposed" which was a bootleg as well as the "Just Dance" vinyl that isnt on her label. I don't think this should be posted as of yet, because the source is NOT reliable. When her official site confirm the release, or it appears on itunes, i believe then it should be posted.-- Apeaboutsims ( talk) 10:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent)I understand, but we wait to see if Interscope indeed puts up this for sale, else we will remove it. --Legolas (talk2me) 10:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
After the video shoot, rumors surfaced. There is said to be a connection to Lorenzo Maitani's "Removal of Paradise". Much like the music video for Telephone, a couple product placements have been mentioned, including, Chanel, and Haus of GaGa. Lady Gaga portrays three different characters throughout the music video, one of them, wearing a set of golden vampire grillz. Three actors were casted to play "Alejandro", "Fernando", and "Roberto", during separate scenes. The man portraying "Alejandro" is said to be a German actor named, Jordan Brower. A selected few scenes were described as "crazier than 'Telephone'", and there is even a burial scene. While there is no confirmation as to when the video is set for release, the director said the video would be finished very soon, and has a possible release sometime in June. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.217.80.146 ( talk) 05:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
^yes the video was shot on April 30 and May 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.184.51 ( talk) 15:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
This song has been confirmed by multiple sources to have many disco and europop influences. I have no idea why it says pop-soul and dance.
IN the article, it says gaga said, "...and the basic meaning behind the song is about "falling in love with your best friend", Alejandro being her friend in the song." That is for "Bad Romance," not "Alejandro". . .
After a hint revealed in a live concert over the weekend that Lady GaGa's "Alejandro" music video is coming out sooner than later, it is now confirmed that the highly-anticipated clip is scheduled to make its debut next week. In a forum on the singer's official website, the video is announced to come out Monday, June 7. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.172.10.79 ( talk) 09:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} The "Alejandro" Single in Sweden has been "Re-Released". Its also appearing in other stores such as the Belgium store. its now released on the 24th Of May. Check the link in the release history section of the article. Thanks-- Apeaboutsims ( talk) 07:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, thats true, the iTunes Sweden source that originally said Februar 15 now says May 24 Link. So, can someone remove February 15 and put May 24 instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Softonic ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
and also add Belguim, also scheduled for May 24. Link. Softonic ( talk) 14:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Done
Chzz
►
16:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
There is an error in the music video section that needs to be fixed. It says "On March 23, 2010, Women's Wear Daily reported that photographer Steven Klein will be directing the music video, which Gaga confirmed herself on May 6, 2010"
Actually VEVO confirmed that Alejandro is suppose to come out tomorrow May 25th.--Nick 15:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smalln ( talk • contribs)
Why have they been removed? If you go on her official site you'll find them so put them back... http://www.ladygaga.co.uk/news.php?item=193 there happy now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.52.167 ( talk) 13:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
In the music video section, add that the video will premiere on June 7, 2010.
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3.
http://www.billboard.com/events/summer-live-preview-1004093814.story?tag=hpflash1#/song/lady-gaga/alejandro/15598432 you have to change the rankings! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.150.10.95 ( talk) 10:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Um excuse me, but who the hell confirmed that Monster is the 4th single? If this is some Monster fan and is too pissed its not single, fucking delete that unless it has been confirmed, You know I think it's because of the likes of you people don't trust Wikipedia any more. Disgusting.
95.84.74.182 (
talk)
15:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
On May 16, 2010, the song re-entered at number ninety five and has so far peaked at forty.[37]
Marcodacious ( talk) 14:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Regarding the Music video for the song - the official release date is Monday June 7, 2010.
69.121.34.224 ( talk) 14:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
The official date is today, June 8th. Source: [5] Syfuel ( talk) 05:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
in the release history section, the release date for the digital download of "Alejandro The Remixes" in
France is May 18, 2010 not May 31, 2010 as per
iTunes France. So change May 31, 2010 to May 18, 2010.
Can someone put this in the article , under paragraph "Music Video" ?
File:LadyGaga_Alejandro.JPG|300px|thumb|right|Still from the music video "Alejandro" by Lady GaGa With two brackets on each side ( [[ ]] ) And does someone knows what copyright license this is? And how do I make references in an article?
LarsFrietman ( talk) 19:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Done
Ben76210 (
talk)
19:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thanks
66.155.211.12 ( talk) 20:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Why aren't these listed in the info box? It's apparent on all the promo singles floating out there that there are two different radio edits, citations aren't necessary for that. The ALBUM VERSION of Alejandro was not released to radio, therefore that length should not just be listed in the album info box (goes with all her other singles that have official radio edits). The official versions released to the radio are the RADIO EDITS so why aren't they listed? This goes for all other Lady Gaga info boxes as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.238.149 ( talk) 22:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
"Yes I am reading the "article", and there is NO PLACE in this article so far that LISTS the the official versions of the song. "Yes I am reading the "article", and there is NO PLACE in this article so far that LISTS the the official versions of the song. And that is not true about the FA for wikipedia, A LOT of the songs list the versions in the infobox, because that's the version released to the radio.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hangshimkim ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
in the release history section, the release date for the digital download of "Alejandro The Remixes" in
France is May 18, 2010 not May 31, 2010 as per
iTunes France. So change May 31, 2010 to May 18, 2010.
But the earliest date should be put, and the earliest is May 18 not June 27. and iTunes is more reliable than Amazon.
This term is also used on the Bad Romance page to explain certain concepts in the video. It's not a synopsis or summary of the video. It's not an opinion Cabaret is a plot here, nor is it opinion there is a Bob Fosse tribute. Sources from trivial sites, and there are a lot on this page, are not be all end all. Thanks for reading, Shakesomeaction ( talk) 01:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The soldiers in this video are meant to represent the gay, transgendered and bisexual men in this society that are *expected* to be aggressive and fully ‘masculine’ men. Them marching around in synchronized form represents the role that they’re expected to play in society – Always marching in a tight pattern, never meant to branch off from that gender role. However, as the video progresses, you see Gaga in and out of scenes, wearing these religious outfits. Those outfits are symbols for the intense religious Christian-Catholic backlash that the LGBT community experiences from religious zealots with how they say that ‘gays are going to hell’, ‘you need jesus,’ ‘being gay is a sin,’ etc.
Gaga is not meant to be the focus of this video. Gaga is simply a symbol for how conflicting religion becomes when a gay man has to emotionally deal with accepting that he’s ‘gay’ when his religion tells him that it’s a sin. Gaga is a modern symbol of the virgin Mary – a cold, religiously bound woman who cares about serving and satisfying Christ. That’s very blatant and evident in what she wears, the crosses in the background, her swallowing rosemary beads, and so on. As the video carries on, you see her getting “felt up” by a man in a scene with various beds.
Those beds are metaphors for what gay men experience when they’re trying to fight their growing erections from their fantasies when trying to sleep at night. During the day, society pressures them to act a certain way, to truly be the biased aggressive man. But as soon as they’re alone, even if they still ‘look’ manly and assertive, their feminine aspect of their sexuality comes to the forefront and they express their fantasies in the dead of night. Also stands for the millions of gays, transgendered and cross dressers that can only show their *true* selves at night when greater society isn’t watching. These few scenes are increasingly sexual in order to show the massive, heated underlying sexual conflict that gay men experience within themselves. It’s restless, monsterous and almost unbearable because society tells them that they shouldn’t express their feelings towards other men.
“Alejandro” is a metaphor for society’s gender role of the aggressive man that society yearns for. The ‘nazi costumes’ are symbols that we are so bound to fulfill gender roles assigned by society to the point where we are psychologically placed into internment camps. Meaning that we’re forced to act a certain way in fear of being shunned, abandoned, alienated or ridiculed. When gay men get mixed up into that, they portray ‘nazis’ in this video or simply ‘strong military men’ to once again show the roles that they’re expected to play by culture’s eyes.
Gaga is a symbol of how mainstream Christianity and Catholicism religions see the LGBT community. The ‘funeral’ represents the LGBT community ‘killing’ those mainstream biased gender roles. The continuous emphasis on showing that one man as ‘Alejandro’ with a scene of a riot playing behind him represents how, despite his throbbing sexuality – he must fulfill his role as a ‘man’ by staying silent as he listens to riots break out surrounding the tension around his sexuality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.104.6.23 ( talk) 01:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
it appears to be the most logical explanation, although not confirmed by gaga herself
I'm new to wikipedia. But the article says that the video recieved mixed reviews because it was being similar to Madonna's work. First of all, I read most of the online reviews, and they all seem to be positive. Second, the Madonna comparisons were trending when the music video preview came out because of the outfits and the black and white colors, but the once the actual 8 minute music video came out, it was all cleared up and most of the critics withdrew this comparisons.
Despite that it has been edited and removed, it was clearly written "critical reviews" and this has no relationship whatsoever with the religious backlashes, and as for the Madonna comparisons, they are actually true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GagaLittleMonster ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
In the "Critical Reception" section, the first time Ace of Base is mentioned it is misspelled as "Ace of Bace" Damianesteves ( talk) 22:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I think calling the video blasphemy is very subjective and depends on how you interpret it, i believe it shows religion in a more positive light, if you read some of kleins comments on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.162.93 ( talk) 09:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
If Gaga wanted to convey a "desire to take in the Holy," why wasn't she shown praying with the Rosary beads instead of devouring them? You know, do with Rosary beads what they were intended to be used for. 75.37.239.18 ( talk) 20:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
She is wearing a device/contraption around the start of the video which she has said is a reference to the same device that Marilyn Manson is wearing in the 'Beautiful People' music video. The two artists recently collaborated on a remix of GaGa's song 'LoveGame' so this is possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.221.118 ( talk) 13:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop deleting my work. It's part of the song's history and her words are verifiable. Catherine Huebscher([[User talk: Catherine Huebscher|talk]]) 18:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
in the release history section, add that "Alejandro The Remixes" has been released on May 18, 2010 in
Canada,
Denmark,
Sweden,
Belguim,
Netherlands,
Norway,
Portugal, and
Switzerland.
For this request, it's that the range of the song only goes from F-sharp 3 to A4, for the vocals. Unfortunately, it seems that musicnotes.com is incorrect, and this request is only based upon personal knowledge by perfect pitch, not by any other outside sources. Therefore, the article has incorrect information, but how would one go about changing it? 75.194.174.108 ( talk) 05:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Partly done: I added references, bt I don't know about the second request, could you be more specific?
Tbhotch
Talk
C.
19:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Truongbaohan (
talk)
00:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Chart (2009/2010) | Peak position |
---|---|
Australian Singles Chart [1] | 2 |
Belgian Singles Chart (Flanders) [2] | 6 |
Belgian Singles Chart (Wallonia) [2] | 7 |
Brazilian Hot 100 Airplay [3] | 97 |
Canadian Hot 100 [4] | 4 |
Czech Airplay Chart [5] | 16 |
Danish Singles Chart [2] | 19 |
Dutch Top 40 [6] | 7 |
European Hot 100 Singles ( Billboard) [7] | 24 |
Finnish Singles Chart [2] | 6 |
French Digital Singles Chart [8] | 3 |
Hungarian Singles Chart [9] | 5 |
Irish Singles Chart [10] | 5 |
New Zealand Singles Chart [11] | 11 |
Norwegian Singles Chart [2] | 9 |
Russian Airplay Chart [12] | 24 |
Slovak Airplay Chart [13] | 2 |
Swedish Singles Chart [2] | 5 |
Swiss Singles Chart [2] | 17 |
UK Singles Chart [14] | 19 |
US Billboard Hot 100 [4] | 5 |
US Hot Dance Club Songs [4] | 2 |
US Mainstream Top 40 [4] | 4 |
"Alejandro" has actually reached number 4 on the Canadian Hot 100, not 12. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.85.219.96 ( talk) 20:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
The song has only just charted at number 40 in the UK not number 10, that link doesn't even say 10 so that's wrong as well
Also, it hasnt peaked at #1 in Australia or #4 in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.14.64 ( talk) 17:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Billboard's site lists on Alejandro's page that the song peaked at #1, not #2.
Billboard Link —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brycake ( talk • contribs) 14:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} in the release history section, can someone add that it will be released as a CD Single in Germany on July 2, 2010. Source.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adultdream ( talk • contribs) 12:21, 21 June 2010
Done, thanks. Chzz ► 15:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Done
I don't know whether it should be mentioned or where on the page. However a russian billionaire paid to make an appearance in the video clip for this song. [15] 112.213.46.7 ( talk) 07:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
this song is about gaga only dating a guy for the cash and sex but she really doesnt love him. she knows that he is cheating on her and that the other girls feel the same way that she does. she doesn't even remember his name so she keeps saying, alejandro, fernando, roberto. she wants to leave but he keeps flattering her with cash and sex . . . "stop, please just let me go". Tisane talk/ stalk 19:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Just would like to know if Madonna was ok with all the refrences. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyinglis ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
i think thats abit rich from Madonna, i dont think she should see it like that because it can be incredibly difficult to be original. Prince Dennis —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.90.56 ( talk) 19:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Alejandro reached #1 (3 weeks) on the Brazillian Charts according to http://www.hot100brasil.com/chtsinglesb.html and not #97 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.63.138.192 ( talk) 18:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
where is the interview? under Composition it says "A mid-tempo song with heavy Europop and disco influences, "Alejandro" is influenced by ABBA and Ace of Base." who said?? especially that ABBA one. when I read this I thought well she must have said this but looking at the referenced posted it was more like They said. They come from blogger-like articles from dead-beat writers I dont think they even critics [6] [7] [8] ^^^ clean-up/move to (if it even qualifies) to Critical reception and delete it from Composition.-- Anen87 ( talk) 03:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} it was added but someone removed it....so, is is being requested again: in the release history section, can someone add that it will be released as a CD Single in Germany on July 2, 2010. Source: Lady Gaga's official German website
Done
Buscaaweb (
talk)
10:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
After a couple of watches of the video, I found out that her dog and beats by dr. dre were not featured in it. anyone know why? 125.78.131.181 ( talk) 09:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
The model holding a golden gun is called Evandro Soldati [Ford]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.206.179.64 ( talk) 20:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
This sounds a good deal like Ace of Base's "Don;t Turn Around," but what ABBA song does is sound like as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 ( talk) 10:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Russian Airplay TopHit 100 Peak position: 1 http://www.tophit.ru/cgi-bin/trackinfo.cgi?id=24041 95.110.22.208 ( talk) 18:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
There could be included the country of release of The Remixes CD single (US). I found this reference: http://www.discogs.com/Lady-GaGa-Alejandro-The-Remixes/release/2327260 (21:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnyboytoy ( talk • contribs)
I'm under the impression that Alejandro (song), released in May 2010, is somehow related to Alexander McQueen, the fashion designer who committed suicide in February 2010 and whose creations were frequently used by Lady Gaga. She even said "this is for Alexander" after she performed another song (Telephone) after his suicide. I haven't searched for any source regarding this connection, but I'd be surprised if there isn't any. Perhaps someone with more time in their hands could search for a source and add the information to the song's and the designer's article? Cogiati ( talk) 22:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
She performed it on BBC'S Radio 1 Bi Weekend —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.27.134 ( talk) 13:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
The currrent version of the article contains this line:
"The Ace of Base influences are prominent in the beats of the song, the vocals and the melody and lastly, in Gaga's non-English accent while singing the song."
What in the world does it mean for Lady Gaga to have a "non-English" accent? Since she's American, why would we expect her to have an English accent in the first place? Did the person who wrote this mean "non-American"? Is the writer implying that she sounds Swedish in this song since Ace of Base is Swedish? Can anyone help here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.108.67.153 ( talk) 00:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I just spotted the erroneous citing of iTunes and fixed it (May 18 -> May 10), and it says iTunes released the song on May 10 in following countries: France, [9] Belgium, [10] Denmark, [11] Netherlands, [12] Norway, [13] Portugal, [14] Sweden [15] and Switzerland. [16] Only the Canadian iTunes released it on May 18, 2010, so why the heck the May 18 is hanging in the info box? Reasoning is...? Thanks for replies! -- Frous ( talk) 11:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
About the template I added for bare links, it wasn't a mistake. Ref 121 is unformatted. The template should be added even if one link is bare. 46.217.63.107 ( talk) 23:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Single went platinum in Russia. Can find it here: http://lenta.ru/articles/2011/02/05/chart/ Chart provided by 2M-online.ru which work with NFPF a Russian part of IFPI. Charts in PDF: http://www.2m-online.ru/news/detail.php?ID=5678 It also was said that single sold 250K in Russia and that combined sales of Gaga's Russian singles (Just Dance, Poker Face, Paparazzi, Bad Romance, Telephone, Alejandro and Dance in the dark) are 2 million copies. Universal music Russia has a link to this charts: http://www.universalmusic.ru/ru/artists/742/news/1364/
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:USALE.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 05:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
Please add 2X certification for Usa. Thank's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.178.255.19 ( talk) 19:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Songs that have a genre described as an "influence" should not make it part of the genre. Just as because a group is influenced by the British invasion bands, doesn't make them part of it. Simple as that really. That's why we should remove euro-pop from the genres in the infobox until further citations are found. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 13:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I was asked to come here by IndianBio who reverted my movement of File:Gaga in Alejandro Video.jpg into the religious iconography section. I accept that this looks worse, however this is not an issue to do with looks but to do with copyright.
I have nominated several images of Gaga videos from articles for deletion as failing WP:NFCC, in particular section 8 which requires that the image aid the reader's understanding. File:LG & B telephone MV 02.jpg for instance is in the Telephone article, but in no way aids the reader's understanding. It's Beyoncé and Gaga in a car - nothing which cannot be easily conveyed in text. File:Gaga in Alejandro Video.jpg has potentially the same issue, if it is in its current position. It is currently in the video synopsis section, where it is not used in any critical manner enhance understanding of the video, thus failing NFCC#8. Where the image does aid understanding is in the religious iconography section, as it's quite hard to know what people are getting worked up over from just text. In this section it passes NFCC, and this is the only section in which it could pass.
This causes issues with the Katy Perry picture placement, as that photo is only relevant to the iconography section. However this image is frankly gratutious - we don't really need a photo of Perry, it's just to stop there being a big block of unillustrated text. We can get rid of this picture without problem. - mattbuck ( Talk) 11:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 17 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.terra.com.mx/articulo/954241/.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.promusicae.org/files/listasradio/historial/TOP%2020%20RADIOS%2010_35.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
AUS
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Uh, I tried to make the page not so much badly written by attempting to delete the italics, but it's not working, so help? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 172.192.9.98 ( talk) 03:27, 8 February 2010 (UTC)
Do we have a source for this? I haven't seen one. So far the best is reference to a video being made and that is from the error in every article unreliable
Sun bizarre column.
SunCreator (
talk)
14:55, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
--- I agree, this doesn't have reliable sources, "the sun" is a tabloid and not a very reliable one at that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.228.139.26 ( talk) 20:54, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
Is this a single or song? If it's a single do we have a WP:RS and if not which is the appropriate template to use? Initially it was Template:Infobox song but since then it's become Template:Infobox single. SunCreator ( talk) 15:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
Do we have any source for the order of the singles? Obvious Bad Romance has been release and Telephone is next. Whatever is next has not been stated to my knowledge. Does anyone have a source for this? SunCreator ( talk) 23:05, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
There is no reliable source for the single cover. But the cover that was previously posted is the actual cover. iTunes UK has removed the download, so it unfortunately can't be a source. Can anyone find an official source so the cover can be reposted? -- Sdoo493 ( talk) 20:13, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Hehe sorry to bug you guys but he's correct, that IS in fact the cover for the promotional single. You know the one you got rid of? And yes, it is indeed the third single. -- Jess28 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.32.120 ( talk) 04:06, 24 February 2010 (UTC)
All Access has posted "Alejandro" on their new singles page. Is this a reliable source? It also has been getting radio airplay. -- Sdoo493 ( talk) 21:47, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
You aren't a smart one are you Legolas? I've heard it on the radio a lot!!!! - Jess28 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.180.32.120 ( talk) 23:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
It has been confirmed as single ,here's the reference http://thatgrapejuice.net/2010/03/lady-gaga-confirms-single/ -- 91.187.103.42 ( talk) 10:12, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
In January 2010, it was reported that Gaga was holding casting calls for the music video for "Alejandro" and was eager for David Walliams to appear in the video alongside his fiancee Lara Stone. [20][21]
Digital Spy and The Sun are listed as sources. They are not reliable at all. That info is fake. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirillgdaily ( talk • contribs) 21:26, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
Lady Gaga confirmed today that the music video is going to be shot soon and will not be the continuation of Telephone. I think this is worth putting into the article. http://gagadaily.com/2010/03/new-lady-gaga-radio-interviews-5/ -- Leporella ( talk) 14:56, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
http://nymag.com/daily/fashion/2010/03/will_steven_klein_do_lady_gaga.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bluedrago197 ( talk • contribs) 01:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
Gaga was interviewed by Australian radio station Nova 96.9, where she talked about the music video. She said "I'm so excited about the 'Alejandro' video,[...]Actually, we're shooting it very soon and I don't want to say who the director is yet because it's going to give a lot away.[...]Are you absolutely mad? I would never, ever tell you![about the concept of the video] I would be more likely to lie through my teeth to you [regarding] what the video's about so that you could all be surprised. But I will tell you it's not the sequel to the 'Telephone' video". I have two theories about the 'Alejandro' video.Ones that 'Teeth' will be released as the 4th single and she will fuse the two videos together(similar to 'Imma Be' and 'Rock That Body' by the Black Eyed Peas.). The other is that she said she would lie through her teeth about the concept. She then said that the video will not be the sequel to 'Telephone', meaning she might've just lied right thier! She did not say who the director is because it might be Jonas Akerland , who directed the 'Paparazzi' and 'Telephone' videos.Well, I just can't wait until the video premieres!-- RebornRocks ( talk) 11:52, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
Someone please delete or revert this article back to the "Other Songs" category.
"The Sun" is not a reliable source. Someone please get rid of this ASAP. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.91.144.123 ( talk) 18:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
-- That's a promotional single, just like "Dance In The Dark". Before the "The Fame Monster" was released both "Dance In The Dark" and "Alejandro" were released as promo singles. That article is for an iTunes page that is for the promo single and it isn't even in the US or Canada. It doesn't prove anything. This article needs to be reverted to the promo single or other songs format. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
72.91.144.123 (
talk)
20:58, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
Singles get music videos, not songs. Why are you so reluctant to say this is a single, no one has said it's not a single yet people have said it is. 206.45.0.225 ( talk) 22:42, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
--
iTunes Sweden shows selling it as a "SINGLE". Is that reliable?— Iknow23 ( talk) 02:27, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
I removed the itunes sweden date...shall i add it back?.....it was just for promo purposes....we all knew that in February "Telephone" was announced as the second single..... Charleysgrilledsubs ( talk) 16:43, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
--
{{editsemiprotected}}
Please change: "The song has a basic sequence of Bm–D–F♯m–Bm–D–F♯m as its chord progression." to "The song verse has a basic sequence of Bm–D–F♯m–Bm–D–F♯m as its chord progression." because the current statement implies that the entire song has the given chord sequence, which is not the case. Only the verse has that chord sequence; the chorus has a different sequence. Anyone with knowledge of music theory can testify to this, though the (transposed) chords on this tab
[2] show that the chord sequence does, in fact, change in the chorus.
129.63.2.70 (
talk)
21:51, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Done Thanks! If you would like to clarify further, just open another request.
Celestra (
talk)
22:31, 4 April 2010 (UTC)
Don't know if this is where to put this but: "A quarrel then arose between Gaga and her label where "Alejandro" was ultimately choose to be released." "choose" should read 'chosen'. I would also suggest that "where" be replaced with '...and her label, the outcome of which was that "Alejandro"...' 124.187.144.5 ( talk) 11:05, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Gagadaily, is Lady Gaga's biggest fansite also featured on her official website. The creator confirmed that the Alejandro music video will be shot during the end of April due to business. Gagadaily is a reliable source and Gaga herself also keeps in touch with them, and gives them exclusive news. Please add this new music video information to the Music Video section. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by WorldFantasia ( talk • contribs) 09:10, 5 April 2010 (UTC)
Lady Gaga has reached a new peak in Canada. It has jumped 28 spots to number 50 on the April 10 archive of Billboard Canadian 100. http://www.billboard.com/charts/canadian-hot-100#/charts/canadian-hot-100?begin=41&order=position —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.82.80.60 ( talk) 14:12, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
Number 8 in Australian Aria Charts on 12/4/2010. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 114.76.23.38 ( talk) 07:12, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
Debuts this week in New Zealand at 35 [www.rianz.org.nz] —Preceding unsigned comment added by 222.155.175.76 ( talk) 12:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Jumps to 28 this week, same source as above in New Zealand.
{{editsemiprotected}}
Lady Gaga is going to be performing Alejandro on American Idol. She confirmed it on Twitter.
WorldFantasia ( talk) 12:50, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
Not done: Welcome. Twitter is not a reliable source. Please provide a relaible source and the exact text you would like to have inserted. Thanks,
Celestra (
talk)
13:56, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Well, since to Wikipedia Gagadaily.com and Twitter are not reliable, what can I do. Anyway, Gaga performed Alejandro at a charity in Japan April 18th. Watch the video of her on youtube. She also sang Speechless and Bad Romance.
WorldFantasia ( talk) 13:32, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
http://www.billboard.com/#/charts/hot-100?begin=21&order=position position 28 ... it needs changing ... canadian hot 100 16 —Preceding unsigned comment added by AriandaGAGA ( talk • contribs) 11:43, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
canadian hot 100 16 not 22 —Preceding unsigned comment added by AriandaGAGA ( talk • contribs) 12:50, 22 April 2010 (UTC)
We need some real sources for the ABBA and Ace of Base allusions. The current sources only lead to a blog writer's speculation. Can we get some sources where Lady Gaga herself confirms this? I did a google search, and I have not found anything more than fan speculation. 75.164.34.162 ( talk) 08:13, 8 April 2010 (UTC)
I would agree that this should be removed. I personally can hear only passing similarities. - Tris —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.187.144.5 ( talk) 11:00, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
Agreed. Those "sources" (I use that term VERY loosely) don't even include quotes from her. I think they should all be removed. Also, the entire "Composition" section is completely wrong. The only thing correct about it is the part about Csardas. And the correct time signature is actually 99 BPM, not 80. I picked this song apart in FL Studio, and I can tell you straight-up that the time signature is 99. Cheers. 75.164.109.82 ( talk) 07:30, 21 April 2010 (UTC)
The sentence "Gaga said that the inspiration behind "Alejandro" was her "Fear of Sex Monster" and the basic meaning behind the song is about "falling in love with your best friend", Alejandro being her friend in the song" has this as a source. The only thing that page says is "LADY GAGA TAKES OVER FUSE! 2 more days of non-stop GAGA on tap. Monday, January 25th from 11AM to 6AM Programs: Lady Gaga: On The Record with Fuse (30 min), The Lady Gaga Chronicles (30 min), Loaded: Lady Gaga. Monday, February 15th from 11AM to 6AM Programs: Lady Gaga: On The Record with Fuse (30 min), The Lady Gaga Chronicles (30 min), Loaded: Lady Gaga". 75.164.33.189 ( talk) 04:22, 25 April 2010 (UTC)
There are plenty of remixes of Alejandro available, and I think we should mention them. Here's the list of remixes that I know of:
Bimbo Jones Club Mix - 6:41
Bimbo Jones Radio Edit - 2:47
DJ Dark Intensity Remix - 4:41
Sound of the Arrows Remix - 3:58
Extended X-Mix - 5:14
NenoMix Tribal Remix - 6:38
DJ Juanje Remix - 4:38
SkuLL Edit - 4:11
Daddy San Mix - 5:15
Nek's Mix - 3:43
That's all I have, but I think we should add them to the article. There is a rumor about a Moto Blanco remix & a Skrillex Remix, but we certainly should wait until it's official.
LOLMFAOROTFL (
talk)
21:50, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
The time signature mentioned in the article is for the SHEET MUSIC, not the actual song. 75.164.99.90 ( talk) 02:35, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
I know that the remix ep may be official, but I think that listing Amazon has the reliable source for it should be removed. Gaga's site has not announced the release in her discography on her site (however usually they advertise around a month ahead). Amazon are also known for posting "Bootlegs" in her official discography as well. Look Here: [http://www.amazon.com/Lady-Gaga/e/B001LH2W8E/ref=sr_ntt_srch_lnk_1?_encoding=UTF8&qid=1273486737&sr=8-1] [http://www.amazon.co.uk/Lady-Gaga/e/B001LH2W8E/ref=s9_k2ah_gw_al1?pf_rd_m=A3P5ROKL5A1OLE&pf_rd_s=center-1&pf_rd_r=07FAK5J2X1XMFWA60QSS&pf_rd_t=101&pf_rd_p=467198433&pf_rd_i=468294#]. These are examples of the Lady Gaga "xposed" which was a bootleg as well as the "Just Dance" vinyl that isnt on her label. I don't think this should be posted as of yet, because the source is NOT reliable. When her official site confirm the release, or it appears on itunes, i believe then it should be posted.-- Apeaboutsims ( talk) 10:32, 10 May 2010 (UTC)
(Outdent)I understand, but we wait to see if Interscope indeed puts up this for sale, else we will remove it. --Legolas (talk2me) 10:33, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
After the video shoot, rumors surfaced. There is said to be a connection to Lorenzo Maitani's "Removal of Paradise". Much like the music video for Telephone, a couple product placements have been mentioned, including, Chanel, and Haus of GaGa. Lady Gaga portrays three different characters throughout the music video, one of them, wearing a set of golden vampire grillz. Three actors were casted to play "Alejandro", "Fernando", and "Roberto", during separate scenes. The man portraying "Alejandro" is said to be a German actor named, Jordan Brower. A selected few scenes were described as "crazier than 'Telephone'", and there is even a burial scene. While there is no confirmation as to when the video is set for release, the director said the video would be finished very soon, and has a possible release sometime in June. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.217.80.146 ( talk) 05:59, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
^yes the video was shot on April 30 and May 1. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.22.184.51 ( talk) 15:41, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
This song has been confirmed by multiple sources to have many disco and europop influences. I have no idea why it says pop-soul and dance.
IN the article, it says gaga said, "...and the basic meaning behind the song is about "falling in love with your best friend", Alejandro being her friend in the song." That is for "Bad Romance," not "Alejandro". . .
After a hint revealed in a live concert over the weekend that Lady GaGa's "Alejandro" music video is coming out sooner than later, it is now confirmed that the highly-anticipated clip is scheduled to make its debut next week. In a forum on the singer's official website, the video is announced to come out Monday, June 7. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.172.10.79 ( talk) 09:11, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} The "Alejandro" Single in Sweden has been "Re-Released". Its also appearing in other stores such as the Belgium store. its now released on the 24th Of May. Check the link in the release history section of the article. Thanks-- Apeaboutsims ( talk) 07:35, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, thats true, the iTunes Sweden source that originally said Februar 15 now says May 24 Link. So, can someone remove February 15 and put May 24 instead. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Softonic ( talk • contribs) 14:41, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
and also add Belguim, also scheduled for May 24. Link. Softonic ( talk) 14:45, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Done
Chzz
►
16:38, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
There is an error in the music video section that needs to be fixed. It says "On March 23, 2010, Women's Wear Daily reported that photographer Steven Klein will be directing the music video, which Gaga confirmed herself on May 6, 2010"
Actually VEVO confirmed that Alejandro is suppose to come out tomorrow May 25th.--Nick 15:05, 24 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smalln ( talk • contribs)
Why have they been removed? If you go on her official site you'll find them so put them back... http://www.ladygaga.co.uk/news.php?item=193 there happy now? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.52.167 ( talk) 13:40, 1 June 2010 (UTC)
{{
editsemiprotected}}
In the music video section, add that the video will premiere on June 7, 2010.
Source 1
Source 2
Source 3.
http://www.billboard.com/events/summer-live-preview-1004093814.story?tag=hpflash1#/song/lady-gaga/alejandro/15598432 you have to change the rankings! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.150.10.95 ( talk) 10:58, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Um excuse me, but who the hell confirmed that Monster is the 4th single? If this is some Monster fan and is too pissed its not single, fucking delete that unless it has been confirmed, You know I think it's because of the likes of you people don't trust Wikipedia any more. Disgusting.
95.84.74.182 (
talk)
15:40, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
On May 16, 2010, the song re-entered at number ninety five and has so far peaked at forty.[37]
Marcodacious ( talk) 14:11, 5 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}}
Regarding the Music video for the song - the official release date is Monday June 7, 2010.
69.121.34.224 ( talk) 14:29, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
The official date is today, June 8th. Source: [5] Syfuel ( talk) 05:47, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
in the release history section, the release date for the digital download of "Alejandro The Remixes" in
France is May 18, 2010 not May 31, 2010 as per
iTunes France. So change May 31, 2010 to May 18, 2010.
Can someone put this in the article , under paragraph "Music Video" ?
File:LadyGaga_Alejandro.JPG|300px|thumb|right|Still from the music video "Alejandro" by Lady GaGa With two brackets on each side ( [[ ]] ) And does someone knows what copyright license this is? And how do I make references in an article?
LarsFrietman ( talk) 19:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Done
Ben76210 (
talk)
19:10, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
thanks
66.155.211.12 ( talk) 20:42, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
Why aren't these listed in the info box? It's apparent on all the promo singles floating out there that there are two different radio edits, citations aren't necessary for that. The ALBUM VERSION of Alejandro was not released to radio, therefore that length should not just be listed in the album info box (goes with all her other singles that have official radio edits). The official versions released to the radio are the RADIO EDITS so why aren't they listed? This goes for all other Lady Gaga info boxes as well. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.231.238.149 ( talk) 22:40, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
"Yes I am reading the "article", and there is NO PLACE in this article so far that LISTS the the official versions of the song. "Yes I am reading the "article", and there is NO PLACE in this article so far that LISTS the the official versions of the song. And that is not true about the FA for wikipedia, A LOT of the songs list the versions in the infobox, because that's the version released to the radio.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Hangshimkim ( talk • contribs) 22:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
in the release history section, the release date for the digital download of "Alejandro The Remixes" in
France is May 18, 2010 not May 31, 2010 as per
iTunes France. So change May 31, 2010 to May 18, 2010.
But the earliest date should be put, and the earliest is May 18 not June 27. and iTunes is more reliable than Amazon.
This term is also used on the Bad Romance page to explain certain concepts in the video. It's not a synopsis or summary of the video. It's not an opinion Cabaret is a plot here, nor is it opinion there is a Bob Fosse tribute. Sources from trivial sites, and there are a lot on this page, are not be all end all. Thanks for reading, Shakesomeaction ( talk) 01:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
The soldiers in this video are meant to represent the gay, transgendered and bisexual men in this society that are *expected* to be aggressive and fully ‘masculine’ men. Them marching around in synchronized form represents the role that they’re expected to play in society – Always marching in a tight pattern, never meant to branch off from that gender role. However, as the video progresses, you see Gaga in and out of scenes, wearing these religious outfits. Those outfits are symbols for the intense religious Christian-Catholic backlash that the LGBT community experiences from religious zealots with how they say that ‘gays are going to hell’, ‘you need jesus,’ ‘being gay is a sin,’ etc.
Gaga is not meant to be the focus of this video. Gaga is simply a symbol for how conflicting religion becomes when a gay man has to emotionally deal with accepting that he’s ‘gay’ when his religion tells him that it’s a sin. Gaga is a modern symbol of the virgin Mary – a cold, religiously bound woman who cares about serving and satisfying Christ. That’s very blatant and evident in what she wears, the crosses in the background, her swallowing rosemary beads, and so on. As the video carries on, you see her getting “felt up” by a man in a scene with various beds.
Those beds are metaphors for what gay men experience when they’re trying to fight their growing erections from their fantasies when trying to sleep at night. During the day, society pressures them to act a certain way, to truly be the biased aggressive man. But as soon as they’re alone, even if they still ‘look’ manly and assertive, their feminine aspect of their sexuality comes to the forefront and they express their fantasies in the dead of night. Also stands for the millions of gays, transgendered and cross dressers that can only show their *true* selves at night when greater society isn’t watching. These few scenes are increasingly sexual in order to show the massive, heated underlying sexual conflict that gay men experience within themselves. It’s restless, monsterous and almost unbearable because society tells them that they shouldn’t express their feelings towards other men.
“Alejandro” is a metaphor for society’s gender role of the aggressive man that society yearns for. The ‘nazi costumes’ are symbols that we are so bound to fulfill gender roles assigned by society to the point where we are psychologically placed into internment camps. Meaning that we’re forced to act a certain way in fear of being shunned, abandoned, alienated or ridiculed. When gay men get mixed up into that, they portray ‘nazis’ in this video or simply ‘strong military men’ to once again show the roles that they’re expected to play by culture’s eyes.
Gaga is a symbol of how mainstream Christianity and Catholicism religions see the LGBT community. The ‘funeral’ represents the LGBT community ‘killing’ those mainstream biased gender roles. The continuous emphasis on showing that one man as ‘Alejandro’ with a scene of a riot playing behind him represents how, despite his throbbing sexuality – he must fulfill his role as a ‘man’ by staying silent as he listens to riots break out surrounding the tension around his sexuality. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.104.6.23 ( talk) 01:39, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
it appears to be the most logical explanation, although not confirmed by gaga herself
I'm new to wikipedia. But the article says that the video recieved mixed reviews because it was being similar to Madonna's work. First of all, I read most of the online reviews, and they all seem to be positive. Second, the Madonna comparisons were trending when the music video preview came out because of the outfits and the black and white colors, but the once the actual 8 minute music video came out, it was all cleared up and most of the critics withdrew this comparisons.
Despite that it has been edited and removed, it was clearly written "critical reviews" and this has no relationship whatsoever with the religious backlashes, and as for the Madonna comparisons, they are actually true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by GagaLittleMonster ( talk • contribs) 22:41, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
In the "Critical Reception" section, the first time Ace of Base is mentioned it is misspelled as "Ace of Bace" Damianesteves ( talk) 22:46, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
I think calling the video blasphemy is very subjective and depends on how you interpret it, i believe it shows religion in a more positive light, if you read some of kleins comments on it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.214.162.93 ( talk) 09:17, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
If Gaga wanted to convey a "desire to take in the Holy," why wasn't she shown praying with the Rosary beads instead of devouring them? You know, do with Rosary beads what they were intended to be used for. 75.37.239.18 ( talk) 20:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
She is wearing a device/contraption around the start of the video which she has said is a reference to the same device that Marilyn Manson is wearing in the 'Beautiful People' music video. The two artists recently collaborated on a remix of GaGa's song 'LoveGame' so this is possible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.166.221.118 ( talk) 13:54, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
Please stop deleting my work. It's part of the song's history and her words are verifiable. Catherine Huebscher([[User talk: Catherine Huebscher|talk]]) 18:58, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
in the release history section, add that "Alejandro The Remixes" has been released on May 18, 2010 in
Canada,
Denmark,
Sweden,
Belguim,
Netherlands,
Norway,
Portugal, and
Switzerland.
For this request, it's that the range of the song only goes from F-sharp 3 to A4, for the vocals. Unfortunately, it seems that musicnotes.com is incorrect, and this request is only based upon personal knowledge by perfect pitch, not by any other outside sources. Therefore, the article has incorrect information, but how would one go about changing it? 75.194.174.108 ( talk) 05:29, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Partly done: I added references, bt I don't know about the second request, could you be more specific?
Tbhotch
Talk
C.
19:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Truongbaohan (
talk)
00:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
Chart (2009/2010) | Peak position |
---|---|
Australian Singles Chart [1] | 2 |
Belgian Singles Chart (Flanders) [2] | 6 |
Belgian Singles Chart (Wallonia) [2] | 7 |
Brazilian Hot 100 Airplay [3] | 97 |
Canadian Hot 100 [4] | 4 |
Czech Airplay Chart [5] | 16 |
Danish Singles Chart [2] | 19 |
Dutch Top 40 [6] | 7 |
European Hot 100 Singles ( Billboard) [7] | 24 |
Finnish Singles Chart [2] | 6 |
French Digital Singles Chart [8] | 3 |
Hungarian Singles Chart [9] | 5 |
Irish Singles Chart [10] | 5 |
New Zealand Singles Chart [11] | 11 |
Norwegian Singles Chart [2] | 9 |
Russian Airplay Chart [12] | 24 |
Slovak Airplay Chart [13] | 2 |
Swedish Singles Chart [2] | 5 |
Swiss Singles Chart [2] | 17 |
UK Singles Chart [14] | 19 |
US Billboard Hot 100 [4] | 5 |
US Hot Dance Club Songs [4] | 2 |
US Mainstream Top 40 [4] | 4 |
"Alejandro" has actually reached number 4 on the Canadian Hot 100, not 12. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.85.219.96 ( talk) 20:02, 15 May 2010 (UTC)
The song has only just charted at number 40 in the UK not number 10, that link doesn't even say 10 so that's wrong as well
Also, it hasnt peaked at #1 in Australia or #4 in the US. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.207.14.64 ( talk) 17:05, 30 May 2010 (UTC)
Billboard's site lists on Alejandro's page that the song peaked at #1, not #2.
Billboard Link —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brycake ( talk • contribs) 14:17, 19 June 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} in the release history section, can someone add that it will be released as a CD Single in Germany on July 2, 2010. Source.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Adultdream ( talk • contribs) 12:21, 21 June 2010
Done, thanks. Chzz ► 15:22, 21 June 2010 (UTC)
Done
I don't know whether it should be mentioned or where on the page. However a russian billionaire paid to make an appearance in the video clip for this song. [15] 112.213.46.7 ( talk) 07:41, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
this song is about gaga only dating a guy for the cash and sex but she really doesnt love him. she knows that he is cheating on her and that the other girls feel the same way that she does. she doesn't even remember his name so she keeps saying, alejandro, fernando, roberto. she wants to leave but he keeps flattering her with cash and sex . . . "stop, please just let me go". Tisane talk/ stalk 19:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
Just would like to know if Madonna was ok with all the refrences. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Tommyinglis ( talk • contribs) 20:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
i think thats abit rich from Madonna, i dont think she should see it like that because it can be incredibly difficult to be original. Prince Dennis —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.42.90.56 ( talk) 19:34, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Alejandro reached #1 (3 weeks) on the Brazillian Charts according to http://www.hot100brasil.com/chtsinglesb.html and not #97 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 189.63.138.192 ( talk) 18:54, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
where is the interview? under Composition it says "A mid-tempo song with heavy Europop and disco influences, "Alejandro" is influenced by ABBA and Ace of Base." who said?? especially that ABBA one. when I read this I thought well she must have said this but looking at the referenced posted it was more like They said. They come from blogger-like articles from dead-beat writers I dont think they even critics [6] [7] [8] ^^^ clean-up/move to (if it even qualifies) to Critical reception and delete it from Composition.-- Anen87 ( talk) 03:16, 15 August 2010 (UTC)
{{editsemiprotected}} it was added but someone removed it....so, is is being requested again: in the release history section, can someone add that it will be released as a CD Single in Germany on July 2, 2010. Source: Lady Gaga's official German website
Done
Buscaaweb (
talk)
10:04, 27 June 2010 (UTC)
After a couple of watches of the video, I found out that her dog and beats by dr. dre were not featured in it. anyone know why? 125.78.131.181 ( talk) 09:25, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
The model holding a golden gun is called Evandro Soldati [Ford]. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.206.179.64 ( talk) 20:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
This sounds a good deal like Ace of Base's "Don;t Turn Around," but what ABBA song does is sound like as well? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.17.118.100 ( talk) 10:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Russian Airplay TopHit 100 Peak position: 1 http://www.tophit.ru/cgi-bin/trackinfo.cgi?id=24041 95.110.22.208 ( talk) 18:27, 11 September 2010 (UTC)
There could be included the country of release of The Remixes CD single (US). I found this reference: http://www.discogs.com/Lady-GaGa-Alejandro-The-Remixes/release/2327260 (21:33, 5 December 2010 (UTC)) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnnyboytoy ( talk • contribs)
I'm under the impression that Alejandro (song), released in May 2010, is somehow related to Alexander McQueen, the fashion designer who committed suicide in February 2010 and whose creations were frequently used by Lady Gaga. She even said "this is for Alexander" after she performed another song (Telephone) after his suicide. I haven't searched for any source regarding this connection, but I'd be surprised if there isn't any. Perhaps someone with more time in their hands could search for a source and add the information to the song's and the designer's article? Cogiati ( talk) 22:45, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
She performed it on BBC'S Radio 1 Bi Weekend —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.153.27.134 ( talk) 13:44, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
The currrent version of the article contains this line:
"The Ace of Base influences are prominent in the beats of the song, the vocals and the melody and lastly, in Gaga's non-English accent while singing the song."
What in the world does it mean for Lady Gaga to have a "non-English" accent? Since she's American, why would we expect her to have an English accent in the first place? Did the person who wrote this mean "non-American"? Is the writer implying that she sounds Swedish in this song since Ace of Base is Swedish? Can anyone help here? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 150.108.67.153 ( talk) 00:34, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I just spotted the erroneous citing of iTunes and fixed it (May 18 -> May 10), and it says iTunes released the song on May 10 in following countries: France, [9] Belgium, [10] Denmark, [11] Netherlands, [12] Norway, [13] Portugal, [14] Sweden [15] and Switzerland. [16] Only the Canadian iTunes released it on May 18, 2010, so why the heck the May 18 is hanging in the info box? Reasoning is...? Thanks for replies! -- Frous ( talk) 11:43, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
About the template I added for bare links, it wasn't a mistake. Ref 121 is unformatted. The template should be added even if one link is bare. 46.217.63.107 ( talk) 23:20, 17 August 2011 (UTC)
Single went platinum in Russia. Can find it here: http://lenta.ru/articles/2011/02/05/chart/ Chart provided by 2M-online.ru which work with NFPF a Russian part of IFPI. Charts in PDF: http://www.2m-online.ru/news/detail.php?ID=5678 It also was said that single sold 250K in Russia and that combined sales of Gaga's Russian singles (Just Dance, Poker Face, Paparazzi, Bad Romance, Telephone, Alejandro and Dance in the dark) are 2 million copies. Universal music Russia has a link to this charts: http://www.universalmusic.ru/ru/artists/742/news/1364/
![]() |
An image used in this article, File:USALE.png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 05:41, 10 November 2011 (UTC) |
Please add 2X certification for Usa. Thank's — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.178.255.19 ( talk) 19:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Songs that have a genre described as an "influence" should not make it part of the genre. Just as because a group is influenced by the British invasion bands, doesn't make them part of it. Simple as that really. That's why we should remove euro-pop from the genres in the infobox until further citations are found. Andrzejbanas ( talk) 13:37, 3 March 2013 (UTC)
I was asked to come here by IndianBio who reverted my movement of File:Gaga in Alejandro Video.jpg into the religious iconography section. I accept that this looks worse, however this is not an issue to do with looks but to do with copyright.
I have nominated several images of Gaga videos from articles for deletion as failing WP:NFCC, in particular section 8 which requires that the image aid the reader's understanding. File:LG & B telephone MV 02.jpg for instance is in the Telephone article, but in no way aids the reader's understanding. It's Beyoncé and Gaga in a car - nothing which cannot be easily conveyed in text. File:Gaga in Alejandro Video.jpg has potentially the same issue, if it is in its current position. It is currently in the video synopsis section, where it is not used in any critical manner enhance understanding of the video, thus failing NFCC#8. Where the image does aid understanding is in the religious iconography section, as it's quite hard to know what people are getting worked up over from just text. In this section it passes NFCC, and this is the only section in which it could pass.
This causes issues with the Katy Perry picture placement, as that photo is only relevant to the iconography section. However this image is frankly gratutious - we don't really need a photo of Perry, it's just to stop there being a big block of unillustrated text. We can get rid of this picture without problem. - mattbuck ( Talk) 11:46, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 12:28, 4 July 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 7 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 01:09, 8 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 17 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.terra.com.mx/articulo/954241/.htm{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.promusicae.org/files/listasradio/historial/TOP%2020%20RADIOS%2010_35.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 03:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Alejandro (song). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:56, 30 June 2017 (UTC)
AUS
was invoked but never defined (see the
help page).{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite journal}}
: Check date values in: |date=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)
{{
cite web}}
: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |work=
(
help)