![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Gorgonian page were merged into Alcyonacea on 16 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Is it possible that you got the suborders wrong? For instance, Stlonifera is not a suborder of Alcyonacea but an order of Alcyonaria. Cheers, Albert Kok (Holland)
For instance, this sentence just does not make any sense:
Related orders in the subclass Octocorallia include Sea pens, Sea fans, Sea whips, bamboo coral and xenias.
Xenia and bamboo coral are in the order Alcyonacea. -- Dr DBW ( talk) 03:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
I came here to make that exact same point, particularly since sea pens and sea fans redirect to Gorgonians. I don't know enough to fix it, though I think it's just plain wrong, so I'm going to delete the sentence. AdventurousMe ( talk) 06:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the proposed merger with Gorgonians would be correct since A) that is a common name and B) Gorgonians do no comprise the entirety of organisms in Alcyonacea / Octocorallia Stichodactyla ( talk) 14:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be any followup or rational for merging with Alcyonarian. On Octocorallia it suggests that Alcyonarian is a synonym. Anyone able to straighten this up? I suggest putting any proposal on Talk:Octocorallia bondolo ( talk) 05:06, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Please see the gorgonian article and comment on the merge request on its talk page.-- Khajidha ( talk) 15:11, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The contents of the Gorgonian page were merged into Alcyonacea on 16 March 2019. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Is it possible that you got the suborders wrong? For instance, Stlonifera is not a suborder of Alcyonacea but an order of Alcyonaria. Cheers, Albert Kok (Holland)
For instance, this sentence just does not make any sense:
Related orders in the subclass Octocorallia include Sea pens, Sea fans, Sea whips, bamboo coral and xenias.
Xenia and bamboo coral are in the order Alcyonacea. -- Dr DBW ( talk) 03:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
I came here to make that exact same point, particularly since sea pens and sea fans redirect to Gorgonians. I don't know enough to fix it, though I think it's just plain wrong, so I'm going to delete the sentence. AdventurousMe ( talk) 06:29, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think the proposed merger with Gorgonians would be correct since A) that is a common name and B) Gorgonians do no comprise the entirety of organisms in Alcyonacea / Octocorallia Stichodactyla ( talk) 14:45, 23 July 2016 (UTC)
There doesn't seem to be any followup or rational for merging with Alcyonarian. On Octocorallia it suggests that Alcyonarian is a synonym. Anyone able to straighten this up? I suggest putting any proposal on Talk:Octocorallia bondolo ( talk) 05:06, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
Please see the gorgonian article and comment on the merge request on its talk page.-- Khajidha ( talk) 15:11, 11 September 2017 (UTC)