![]() | Alasdair Cochrane has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This guy is a nobody in political science. As usual, Wikipedia prostitutes itself to self-promoters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.35.123 ( talk) 06:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
None of his books or articles have close to even a hundred citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.35.123 ( talk) 06:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Totally agree with above comments. From the picture, there appears to be a dozen people in his seminar. All University departments have same similar audiences on seminar days, so why isn't every academic in wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.81.95.161 ( talk) 09:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
@ J Milburn: please check the refs. Some of the notes don't correspond to any cited works. Eg. there is Cochrane 2012a in the notes but not in cited works. The ones that give me error ( Template:Harvard citation documentation#Possible issues) are: Cochrane 2010a, Cochrane 2012a, Cochrane 2014, Hadley 2013a, Schmidt 2015, Milligan 2015, Donaldson & Kymlicka 2011. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 02:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 15:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry it had to wait more than three months for a (decent) review. I will post a review soon. Cheers,
Sainsf (
talk ·
contribs)
15:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Fairly well-written, only a few comments: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 07:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Very well, I am sure this is dangerously near FA standard! :) Promoting this. Cheers, Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 10:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Alasdair Cochrane has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This guy is a nobody in political science. As usual, Wikipedia prostitutes itself to self-promoters. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.35.123 ( talk) 06:16, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
None of his books or articles have close to even a hundred citations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.244.35.123 ( talk) 06:18, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
Totally agree with above comments. From the picture, there appears to be a dozen people in his seminar. All University departments have same similar audiences on seminar days, so why isn't every academic in wikipedia? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.81.95.161 ( talk) 09:30, 20 September 2016 (UTC)
@ J Milburn: please check the refs. Some of the notes don't correspond to any cited works. Eg. there is Cochrane 2012a in the notes but not in cited works. The ones that give me error ( Template:Harvard citation documentation#Possible issues) are: Cochrane 2010a, Cochrane 2012a, Cochrane 2014, Hadley 2013a, Schmidt 2015, Milligan 2015, Donaldson & Kymlicka 2011. – Finnusertop ( talk ⋅ contribs) 02:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 15:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry it had to wait more than three months for a (decent) review. I will post a review soon. Cheers,
Sainsf (
talk ·
contribs)
15:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Fairly well-written, only a few comments: Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 07:28, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Very well, I am sure this is dangerously near FA standard! :) Promoting this. Cheers, Sainsf ( talk · contribs) 10:38, 5 June 2016 (UTC)