The original AFD debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Shefman has been shut down due to politically partisan crosstalk which irreparably distracted from the basic issue of whether Alan Shefman does or does not merit a Wikipedia article. The article has been resubmitted for a new AFD debate on procedural grounds. Bearcat 09:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on November 5, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
— JIP | Talk 06:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
wikified
pm_shef 06:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
The last post seemed like self-promotion to me. No need for that on Wikipedia.-- 69.156.148.124 21:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
You guys have been blanking others for the above reason like deputy Mayor Mario Ferri. This article should infact be deleted. -- 69.156.151.42 04:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
How can you justify this interim councillor stay when you are taking down other "Full-Time" city councillors, the deputy mayor and the mayor. This article is nothing more than a self promotion posted by Shefman's son and updated by himself. Please explain to me why you think the lowest position on council deserves an article but the "full-time" councillors, regional councillors, deputy mayor and mayor are being blanked?-- 69.156.151.42 06:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Basicly you are saying this article of a "interim" councillor deserves to have the self promotion content but all other more senior positions "full-time councillors, regional councillors, Deputy Mayor and Mayor don't deserve this as you guys keep blanking there article. Also, why do you keep taking the "interim" portion out of this article to give the false impression that he is a full term councillor? If you insist that this article stays as is then revert all the other more senior articles. -- 69.156.151.42 16:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Added correct title, removed PoV per other members of council. -- Eyeonvaughan 17:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
I deleted a few sentences at the end. Nobody is interested in irrelevent facts on Shefman's life. This is something that is best left to his Campaign flyers. above unsigned by user 70.29.239.249
Dah well
above unsigned by user 70.29.239.249
I'm stil waiting for you to report me. It's funny, because you think your version of this page is the correct version. You sound like Vaughan City Council, you should try and run in the future.
above unsigned by user 70.29.239.249
I agree with user VaughanWatch, why does Shefman have so much information, while the mayor only has one sentence. Cue the Prime Minister... 70.29.239.249 04:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Please explain why "interim" councillor was removed. Wasn't he elected to this position in a by-election half through the term? If he was elected in a by-election then he is the interim councillor as he would be the councillor NOT elected in the general election but filling in until the next general election. Interim is commonly used in these situations, websters dictionary defines interm as "in the meantime".-- 67.70.148.49 20:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
This man is NOT notable. The Mayor of Vaughan has 2 or 3 sentences, though a veteran of Vaughan Council for 21 years; the local Councillor Alan Shefman, chosen in a by-election 13 months ago, has 2 pages.
Why? Because Alan Shefman's son is pm_shef and he is a staunch Liberal. Why do councillors Mario Ferri and Sandra Yeung Racco have two pages (before I shortened them today) and councillors Linda Jackson, Joyce Frustaglio, Peter Meffe, Tony Carella and Bernie di Vona have two lines? Because both Ferri and Racco are proclaimed Liberals, and everybody else is not; even Racco's spouse, Mario Racco, is a Liberal MPP. And being a Liberal seems to be the criteria for receiving glorified, self-promotional encyclopedia listings in Vaughan. And help from pm_shef .
To the admin reviewing this article, I plead with you - for the sake of objectivity, of encyclopedic integrity, remove this article and place it among the heap where over 5000 other councillors of Ontario are confined. *Delete VaughanWatch 04:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Why is the Alan Shefman article is not redirected? also, pm_shef (the son of Alan Shefman) that caused all these problems on here should be permanetly kicked off of wiki for numerous politically motivated attempts. He agrees to redirect all the pages and does it himself but leaves his fathers article still up!-- Eyeonvaughan 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
You guys are f**king dorks. You are arguing about an area councillor in Vaughan. How will your lives be enriched if it is deleted? some sort of f**ked up self satisfaction? ITS WIKIPEDIA FOR GODS SAKE no one is going to stumble upon it and say hey? this Alan Shefman guy has a wrote of facts written about him !wow! he must be amazing lets call him our new god.... and so on and so forth. The fact that your wasting your time and energy on this probably says a lot about your guys boring pathetic lives. well thats all for now.....
Above unsigned comment by
User:69.158.163.219
The original AFD debate at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Shefman has been shut down due to politically partisan crosstalk which irreparably distracted from the basic issue of whether Alan Shefman does or does not merit a Wikipedia article. The article has been resubmitted for a new AFD debate on procedural grounds. Bearcat 09:24, 5 November 2005 (UTC)
This article was nominated for deletion on November 5, 2005. The result of the discussion was keep. |
— JIP | Talk 06:56, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
wikified
pm_shef 06:29, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
The last post seemed like self-promotion to me. No need for that on Wikipedia.-- 69.156.148.124 21:36, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
You guys have been blanking others for the above reason like deputy Mayor Mario Ferri. This article should infact be deleted. -- 69.156.151.42 04:00, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
How can you justify this interim councillor stay when you are taking down other "Full-Time" city councillors, the deputy mayor and the mayor. This article is nothing more than a self promotion posted by Shefman's son and updated by himself. Please explain to me why you think the lowest position on council deserves an article but the "full-time" councillors, regional councillors, deputy mayor and mayor are being blanked?-- 69.156.151.42 06:31, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Basicly you are saying this article of a "interim" councillor deserves to have the self promotion content but all other more senior positions "full-time councillors, regional councillors, Deputy Mayor and Mayor don't deserve this as you guys keep blanking there article. Also, why do you keep taking the "interim" portion out of this article to give the false impression that he is a full term councillor? If you insist that this article stays as is then revert all the other more senior articles. -- 69.156.151.42 16:52, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Added correct title, removed PoV per other members of council. -- Eyeonvaughan 17:07, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
I deleted a few sentences at the end. Nobody is interested in irrelevent facts on Shefman's life. This is something that is best left to his Campaign flyers. above unsigned by user 70.29.239.249
Dah well
above unsigned by user 70.29.239.249
I'm stil waiting for you to report me. It's funny, because you think your version of this page is the correct version. You sound like Vaughan City Council, you should try and run in the future.
above unsigned by user 70.29.239.249
I agree with user VaughanWatch, why does Shefman have so much information, while the mayor only has one sentence. Cue the Prime Minister... 70.29.239.249 04:50, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Please explain why "interim" councillor was removed. Wasn't he elected to this position in a by-election half through the term? If he was elected in a by-election then he is the interim councillor as he would be the councillor NOT elected in the general election but filling in until the next general election. Interim is commonly used in these situations, websters dictionary defines interm as "in the meantime".-- 67.70.148.49 20:47, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
This man is NOT notable. The Mayor of Vaughan has 2 or 3 sentences, though a veteran of Vaughan Council for 21 years; the local Councillor Alan Shefman, chosen in a by-election 13 months ago, has 2 pages.
Why? Because Alan Shefman's son is pm_shef and he is a staunch Liberal. Why do councillors Mario Ferri and Sandra Yeung Racco have two pages (before I shortened them today) and councillors Linda Jackson, Joyce Frustaglio, Peter Meffe, Tony Carella and Bernie di Vona have two lines? Because both Ferri and Racco are proclaimed Liberals, and everybody else is not; even Racco's spouse, Mario Racco, is a Liberal MPP. And being a Liberal seems to be the criteria for receiving glorified, self-promotional encyclopedia listings in Vaughan. And help from pm_shef .
To the admin reviewing this article, I plead with you - for the sake of objectivity, of encyclopedic integrity, remove this article and place it among the heap where over 5000 other councillors of Ontario are confined. *Delete VaughanWatch 04:51, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
Why is the Alan Shefman article is not redirected? also, pm_shef (the son of Alan Shefman) that caused all these problems on here should be permanetly kicked off of wiki for numerous politically motivated attempts. He agrees to redirect all the pages and does it himself but leaves his fathers article still up!-- Eyeonvaughan 04:31, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
You guys are f**king dorks. You are arguing about an area councillor in Vaughan. How will your lives be enriched if it is deleted? some sort of f**ked up self satisfaction? ITS WIKIPEDIA FOR GODS SAKE no one is going to stumble upon it and say hey? this Alan Shefman guy has a wrote of facts written about him !wow! he must be amazing lets call him our new god.... and so on and so forth. The fact that your wasting your time and energy on this probably says a lot about your guys boring pathetic lives. well thats all for now.....
Above unsigned comment by
User:69.158.163.219