This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Alabama HB 56 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 October 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
No permission is needed to be sought when referencing or using information produced from the Alabama state legislature. Please stop deleting this page. This information is free to be viewed by the public. And is public property. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 6749174639201elephant ( talk • contribs) 29 Sep 2011
The Mercedes-Benz executive being arrested story here has been whitewashed to protect a xenophobic law. Not surprised its Alabama and the South. -- JLAmidei ( talk) 01:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The reference to supporters' statements that the law helped reduce unemployment is contrasted here with an academic analysis of the sectors experiencing job growth. If, as supporters believe, the law opened up jobs in construction, agriculture and poultry processing to previously unemployed non-immigrants, then no "job growth" would be necessary to reduce unemployment. -- Dystopos ( talk) 18:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I removed the listing for Nuremburg laws from the list of see also. The Nuremburg laws were designed to target people of a specific ethnicity, regardless of their citizenship status. HB 56 is designed to target people who are in the state illegally. You can argue that the law is institutionalized racism and theres plenty of reason to think this. Wikipedia is not the place to do this. -- Arm ( talk) 05:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
I noticed this article has used the terms "legal" and "illegal" and "documented" and "undocumented" at various times. Is there are reason why it's universally legal/illegal right now? I know this is a point of contention for some, but it makes sense to me that legal/illegal describes a crime and documented/undocumented describes a person. Also, less contentious or biased reading. Dronthego ( talk) 16:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Alabama HB 56. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.uab.edu/esl/images/HB_56_What_You_Need_to_Know_Aug_2012.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
This law has been mostly struck down in court in 2013, but some parts remain. [1] -- ke4roh ( talk) 20:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Alabama HB 56 appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 8 October 2011 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
No permission is needed to be sought when referencing or using information produced from the Alabama state legislature. Please stop deleting this page. This information is free to be viewed by the public. And is public property. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 6749174639201elephant ( talk • contribs) 29 Sep 2011
The Mercedes-Benz executive being arrested story here has been whitewashed to protect a xenophobic law. Not surprised its Alabama and the South. -- JLAmidei ( talk) 01:27, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
The reference to supporters' statements that the law helped reduce unemployment is contrasted here with an academic analysis of the sectors experiencing job growth. If, as supporters believe, the law opened up jobs in construction, agriculture and poultry processing to previously unemployed non-immigrants, then no "job growth" would be necessary to reduce unemployment. -- Dystopos ( talk) 18:39, 3 February 2012 (UTC)
I removed the listing for Nuremburg laws from the list of see also. The Nuremburg laws were designed to target people of a specific ethnicity, regardless of their citizenship status. HB 56 is designed to target people who are in the state illegally. You can argue that the law is institutionalized racism and theres plenty of reason to think this. Wikipedia is not the place to do this. -- Arm ( talk) 05:11, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
An RfC: Which descriptor, if any, can be added in front of Southern Poverty Law Center when referenced in other articles? has been posted at the Southern Poverty Law Center talk page. Your participation is welcomed. – MrX 16:16, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
I noticed this article has used the terms "legal" and "illegal" and "documented" and "undocumented" at various times. Is there are reason why it's universally legal/illegal right now? I know this is a point of contention for some, but it makes sense to me that legal/illegal describes a crime and documented/undocumented describes a person. Also, less contentious or biased reading. Dronthego ( talk) 16:20, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Alabama HB 56. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.uab.edu/esl/images/HB_56_What_You_Need_to_Know_Aug_2012.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 18 January 2022).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 12:13, 29 June 2017 (UTC)
This law has been mostly struck down in court in 2013, but some parts remain. [1] -- ke4roh ( talk) 20:04, 21 March 2019 (UTC)