This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

U.S. Supreme Court cases Low‑importance This article is part of WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court cases, a collaborative effort to improve articles related to Supreme Court cases and the Supreme Court. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.U.S. Supreme Court casesWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesTemplate:WikiProject U.S. Supreme Court casesU.S. Supreme Court articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. Law Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Although the standard capitalization of Arabic names calls for "al-Marri," the Fourth Circuit's actual case opinion, as seen in the running header after the first page in large and small capitals, is "Al-Marri." -- Turtle Falcon 21:18, 18 June 2007 (UTC) reply

I'm not surprised, but I don't see that in the linked PDF. Do you have another source?-- Chaser - T 21:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC) reply

Does the 4th circuit decision refer to the en-banc decision [1]? BjoernZ ( talk) 13:41, 24 June 2009 (UTC) reply