Nicely done, in general, but several MOS quibbles on your sources.
Be consistent about using place of publication and title case.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 23:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Hello
Sturmvogel, and thanks for taking the time! I've fixed the source formatting, and made a few minor changes there to be consistent with other articles. On the map, there is
this map which I've used elsewhere, but I am not really satisfied by it, it has too few details. I'll see if I can create a better one over the weekend. Other than that, anything else, prose- or content-wise? Cheers,
Nothing that I could see. Any map is better than none, so I'll not delay the promotion over a better one.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 20:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Nicely done, in general, but several MOS quibbles on your sources.
Be consistent about using place of publication and title case.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 23:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)reply
Hello
Sturmvogel, and thanks for taking the time! I've fixed the source formatting, and made a few minor changes there to be consistent with other articles. On the map, there is
this map which I've used elsewhere, but I am not really satisfied by it, it has too few details. I'll see if I can create a better one over the weekend. Other than that, anything else, prose- or content-wise? Cheers,
Nothing that I could see. Any map is better than none, so I'll not delay the promotion over a better one.--
Sturmvogel 66 (
talk) 20:56, 30 October 2014 (UTC)reply