This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Philosophy Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia and other user-generated sources cannot be cited, because they're not reliable. Hamid poostchi, do you have other sources on this book that you can add? See WP:Reliable sources. – Roscelese ( talk ⋅ contribs) 13:11, 6 July 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Sa.vakilian:I suggest the new structure for the page and try to restabish it accordingly:

• author
• content
• characters
• translations
• commentaries

-- m,sharaf ( talk) 17:43, 8 July 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Mehdi ghaed: Your edit here borders on close paraphrasing from Encyclopædia Iranica, "Three Muslim Sages" [1] and possibly other sources I did not immediately bother to identify. You shouldn't do that, since it can be considered copyright violation and/or plagiarism.-- Anders Feder ( talk) 20:15, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Anders Feder:. that's it . I gradually try to express it myself. I will change it-- m,sharaf ( talk) 21:45, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

Thanks.-- Anders Feder ( talk) 21:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply

@ Anders Feder:. Thanks. I corrected it.-- m,sharaf ( talk) 22:04, 9 July 2015 (UTC) reply