![]() | Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 8, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The transcription "Al-Amīr" does not seem to match Arabic الآمر ... AnonMoos ( talk) 07:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Feel free to insert this coin into the article. PHG ( talk) 20:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Al Ameer son ( talk · contribs) 04:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Will begin review within the coming few days; made some minor copyedits, feel free to revert if unhelpful. Al Ameer ( talk) 04:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
@ Al Ameer son: I have addressed the points above. Anything else? Constantine ✍ 06:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk)
00:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Cplakidas ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 21:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Heyy, Neveselbert and Cplakidas: you (separately) removed links I'd put in "Cairo" and "Fatimid Caliphate" in the birth date field of the infobox.
I had seen them linked once within the infobox, but I chose to link them a second time at the place of birth as I figured (from my own behaviour) that birth- and death-date and place are spots where a lot of readers would glance first; Cairo being linked in the caption at the top would be completely lost, and perhaps readers wouldn't look at the caliph's title before his place of birth. What do you think, do you disagree with this rationale?
I only found out about MOS:GEOLINK while voraciously reading the manual of style for linking before posting this, but separate links to modern-day Cairo and the Fatimid Caliphate still make sense to me, as the Caliphate is a historical geographic place—and linking it here will provide important context about the historical state, at the expense of some link clarity, to readers who will glance at the infobox first. — I'llbeyourbeach ( talk) 20:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
|birth_place=
. I don't think a second link to
Fatimid Caliphate would be necessarily helpful. ‑‑
Neveselbert (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() | Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah has been listed as one of the
History good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: April 8, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 10 May 2023 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
The transcription "Al-Amīr" does not seem to match Arabic الآمر ... AnonMoos ( talk) 07:03, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
Feel free to insert this coin into the article. PHG ( talk) 20:16, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Al Ameer son ( talk · contribs) 04:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
Will begin review within the coming few days; made some minor copyedits, feel free to revert if unhelpful. Al Ameer ( talk) 04:39, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
@ Al Ameer son: I have addressed the points above. Anything else? Constantine ✍ 06:52, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
The result was: promoted by
BorgQueen (
talk)
00:36, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Improved to Good Article status by Cplakidas ( talk). Nominated by Onegreatjoke ( talk) at 21:06, 14 April 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Al-Amir bi-Ahkam Allah; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Policy compliance:
Hook eligibility:
QPQ: Done. |
Heyy, Neveselbert and Cplakidas: you (separately) removed links I'd put in "Cairo" and "Fatimid Caliphate" in the birth date field of the infobox.
I had seen them linked once within the infobox, but I chose to link them a second time at the place of birth as I figured (from my own behaviour) that birth- and death-date and place are spots where a lot of readers would glance first; Cairo being linked in the caption at the top would be completely lost, and perhaps readers wouldn't look at the caliph's title before his place of birth. What do you think, do you disagree with this rationale?
I only found out about MOS:GEOLINK while voraciously reading the manual of style for linking before posting this, but separate links to modern-day Cairo and the Fatimid Caliphate still make sense to me, as the Caliphate is a historical geographic place—and linking it here will provide important context about the historical state, at the expense of some link clarity, to readers who will glance at the infobox first. — I'llbeyourbeach ( talk) 20:13, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
|birth_place=
. I don't think a second link to
Fatimid Caliphate would be necessarily helpful. ‑‑
Neveselbert (
talk ·
contribs ·
email)
07:22, 15 May 2023 (UTC)