This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Biography: Science and Academia This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance). India: Politics Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Indian politics workgroup (assessed as Low-importance). Socialism Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The last paragraph is original research. There is no citation or support. I am removing it for now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.245.35.5 ( talk) 20:13, 4 April 2008 (UTC) reply

Certainly in In Theory he works as a historian and his critical engagement with/against post-moderism and the Subaltern Studie group merits, in my opinion, his inclusion in the category of Indian historians. I think he should have a category more specific than just "Indian People", which is far too vague. If anyone one has other better or complementary ideas for categories, we can discuss them here. Interlingua ^talk 02:44, 15 June 2006 (UTC) reply

that cheapens the article....He's amazing, but come one...it cheapens it

The article had one sentence of fulsome praise for Aijaz Ahmad; I removed it. WP cannot take any position on the truth or falsity of his ideas, on his intelligence or lack thereof. If someone wants to quote a reliable source as to his importance, please do. Zora 07:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC) reply

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 17:13, 9 November 2007 (UTC) reply

The link for "Islam, Islamisms and the West" doesn't work anymore" EUnderwood ( talk) 07:29, 24 October 2017 (UTC) reply