![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Priority 5
|
I have moved the article from Agathis australis to Kauri since Kauri is a unique name. Alan Liefting 08:58, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
"Kauri today
The world's remaining Kauri are predominantly found in the northern half of the North Island."
Redundant? This is their natural range after all. Dougalc 04:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I've recently added several sections to the article as well as changing and merging a few others. The article previously opened with material too specific in the lead which had never been placed in its own section. How should we best split up the remaining material? It has been moved down to 'description', though I find that word too general - the whole article is a description of kauri trees in one way or another. Perhaps opening with something like 'Morphology' and perhaps adding a section on taxonomy for completeness would be the best way to go? There is some material under 'Description' that doesn't really qualify as 'morphology', though I'm sure it could be merged somewhere else. Richard001 08:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Too technical? I don't know where else we could move this but I doubt many readers come here wondering what kauri's modulus of elasticity is, even if they are familiar with the term. Richard001 11:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
A anonymous editor has added some lines on deforestation recently. It refers to "Adams 1990". There is no source Adams 1990. Does the editor mean "Adams 1980"? I can't check it. - Dick Bos ( talk) 13:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking of starting a Warawara page & moving the Warawara section out to it - most of it anyway? LawrieM ( talk) 21:49, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
What does this sentence mean? Despite this, like many native urban trees, it falls victim to "new owners" syndrome, so there are relatively few such trees in cities older than 40 years. I never heard of the 'new owners syndrome. I can guess the idea : it means when ownership is transfered people cut the native trees. I still don't get why it's worded in such an odd, obscure way. Can anyone good with English reword better? Correjon ( talk) 04:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
I removed a link to a website about ancient kauri from the Agathis page, thinking I would place it on this page. On closer look it was a commercial link so I won't place it anywhere. Kahuroa ( talk) 20:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
I see தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன் ( talk · contribs) has proposed merging the article for the genus Agathis into this article on the New Zealand species. I can't see why. Does anyone object to the merge tag being removed? -- Avenue ( talk) 10:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh, Sorry. First I thought that both are same. Now I understood both are different.
It seems like you have a interest in that article. May I know the meaning of Kauri one of the name of Agathis in Vernacular Language?-- Tenkasi Subramanian ( talk) 13:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Agathis australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Agathis australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/media/publications-journals-nzjb-1987-016.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Kauri are now threatened [4] Nixinova T C 06:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
"Kauri requires a mean temperature of 17 °C or more for most of the year"
Where did this come from? The source is not provided, but is assumed to be [16]. It cannot be correct since Northland mean temperature is <17C from May to November inclusive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.21.130.193 ( talk) 04:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Can information about the role of the 42,000-year-old A. australis tree found in New Zealand in determining the geomagnetic reversal that took place 42,000 years ago be added to this article? 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 09:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Surely the "Overview" section should just be the lead? Draco phyllum 07:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
Priority 5
|
I have moved the article from Agathis australis to Kauri since Kauri is a unique name. Alan Liefting 08:58, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
"Kauri today
The world's remaining Kauri are predominantly found in the northern half of the North Island."
Redundant? This is their natural range after all. Dougalc 04:00, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I've recently added several sections to the article as well as changing and merging a few others. The article previously opened with material too specific in the lead which had never been placed in its own section. How should we best split up the remaining material? It has been moved down to 'description', though I find that word too general - the whole article is a description of kauri trees in one way or another. Perhaps opening with something like 'Morphology' and perhaps adding a section on taxonomy for completeness would be the best way to go? There is some material under 'Description' that doesn't really qualify as 'morphology', though I'm sure it could be merged somewhere else. Richard001 08:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Too technical? I don't know where else we could move this but I doubt many readers come here wondering what kauri's modulus of elasticity is, even if they are familiar with the term. Richard001 11:55, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
A anonymous editor has added some lines on deforestation recently. It refers to "Adams 1990". There is no source Adams 1990. Does the editor mean "Adams 1980"? I can't check it. - Dick Bos ( talk) 13:02, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
I was thinking of starting a Warawara page & moving the Warawara section out to it - most of it anyway? LawrieM ( talk) 21:49, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
What does this sentence mean? Despite this, like many native urban trees, it falls victim to "new owners" syndrome, so there are relatively few such trees in cities older than 40 years. I never heard of the 'new owners syndrome. I can guess the idea : it means when ownership is transfered people cut the native trees. I still don't get why it's worded in such an odd, obscure way. Can anyone good with English reword better? Correjon ( talk) 04:01, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
I removed a link to a website about ancient kauri from the Agathis page, thinking I would place it on this page. On closer look it was a commercial link so I won't place it anywhere. Kahuroa ( talk) 20:44, 29 March 2011 (UTC)
I see தென்காசி சுப்பிரமணியன் ( talk · contribs) has proposed merging the article for the genus Agathis into this article on the New Zealand species. I can't see why. Does anyone object to the merge tag being removed? -- Avenue ( talk) 10:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Oh, Sorry. First I thought that both are same. Now I understood both are different.
It seems like you have a interest in that article. May I know the meaning of Kauri one of the name of Agathis in Vernacular Language?-- Tenkasi Subramanian ( talk) 13:22, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Agathis australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:54, 5 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Agathis australis. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
{{
dead link}}
tag to
http://www.royalsociety.org.nz/media/publications-journals-nzjb-1987-016.pdfWhen you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 22:08, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Kauri are now threatened [4] Nixinova T C 06:10, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
"Kauri requires a mean temperature of 17 °C or more for most of the year"
Where did this come from? The source is not provided, but is assumed to be [16]. It cannot be correct since Northland mean temperature is <17C from May to November inclusive. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.21.130.193 ( talk) 04:50, 30 December 2019 (UTC)
Can information about the role of the 42,000-year-old A. australis tree found in New Zealand in determining the geomagnetic reversal that took place 42,000 years ago be added to this article? 173.88.246.138 ( talk) 09:12, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Surely the "Overview" section should just be the lead? Draco phyllum 07:28, 27 May 2021 (UTC)