A fact from Agastomyrma appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 5 December 2016 ( check views). The text of the entry was as follows: Did you know... that the fossil ant genus Agastomyrma was described from a single queen? A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2016/December. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Agastomyrma.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Palaeontology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Insects: Ants Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Ant task force (assessed as Mid-importance). Russia Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The original authors state (p. 143): "Etymology. From Latin agastus (pleasing) and Greek Myrmica (ant)." Agastus can not be found in classical Latin (as checked in Lewis & Short, Oxford Latin Dictionary (1968) and the Tensaurus Italograecus (1884)), but is seen as ἀγαστός (agastos) in ancient Greek. Myrmica is not even Greek. They might confuse the genus name Myrmica with the real ancient Greek name for ant, i.e. μύρμηξ (or alternatively μύρμος). So, currently, the Wiki article is providing incorrect information. Wimpus ( talk) 15:53, 22 October 2018 (UTC) reply