![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'd like to split off the Lazy Gun stuff back into its own article. It's fascinating, but I feel too detailed for a book article. Guinnog 00:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Is there any hidden connection to the Culture as there is with Inversions? (I could not spot one with either but there apparently is with the latter.)-- Lucifer 15:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Since the Lazy Gun is a fictional object, and exists only within this single story, I agree that its article should be merged with this one, as a sub-section. Efalk ( talk) 13:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Seconded. Confuseatron ( talk) 00:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Sounds Reasonable. Corhen ( talk) 04:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Absolutely, merge with a redirect. Voiceofreason01 ( talk) 16:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Without explanation, the entire section on the Lazy Gun has been removed. Frankly, that was the most interesting part of the book. Efalk ( talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
I can't find the pages linked to any of the footnotes. I'll see if I can find suitable replacements if/when I get a Round Tuit. Isambardcat ( talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
There is a major give-away in the first paragraph: the meaning of the novel's title. It has no place in a synopsis. I am removing it. Yunuswesley ( talk) 01:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
I'd like to split off the Lazy Gun stuff back into its own article. It's fascinating, but I feel too detailed for a book article. Guinnog 00:27, 6 February 2006 (UTC)
Is there any hidden connection to the Culture as there is with Inversions? (I could not spot one with either but there apparently is with the latter.)-- Lucifer 15:41, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
Since the Lazy Gun is a fictional object, and exists only within this single story, I agree that its article should be merged with this one, as a sub-section. Efalk ( talk) 13:48, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
Seconded. Confuseatron ( talk) 00:05, 19 August 2009 (UTC)
Sounds Reasonable. Corhen ( talk) 04:16, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Absolutely, merge with a redirect. Voiceofreason01 ( talk) 16:46, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
Without explanation, the entire section on the Lazy Gun has been removed. Frankly, that was the most interesting part of the book. Efalk ( talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
I can't find the pages linked to any of the footnotes. I'll see if I can find suitable replacements if/when I get a Round Tuit. Isambardcat ( talk) 12:58, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
There is a major give-away in the first paragraph: the meaning of the novel's title. It has no place in a synopsis. I am removing it. Yunuswesley ( talk) 01:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)