![]() | Afternoon has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 10, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Afternoon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 January 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article states: 'The Irish language contains four different words to mark time intervals from late afternoon to nightfall. citation needed'. Isn't this rather unclear? I have looked online to try and find information on this and I can't find anything to back it up. It also says 'citation needed'. Doesn't a citation need sourcing for this? And if nothing can be found, wouldn't it be an idea to consider removing it? H.A.W.C 101 ( talk) 16:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
I tink that the picture is not enough representative about the afternoon, it more like evening. From wikipedia article evening : "The evening is the period in which the daylight is decreasing" The image is great though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.57.69.201 ( talk) 11:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
! How on earth did a picture of a ghost make its way onto this page. 'Encyclopedic content must be verifiable' is being severely tried on this occasion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.45.115 ( talk) 16:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 14:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
I'll leave some initial comments this late afternoon (ho ho ho). ☠
Jag
uar ☠ 14:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The tool server is currently down so I had to check the references manually. They all seem to be functioning and I couldn't find any that seemed unreliable (not on this topic anyway). The citations are also in their correct places so this meets the GA criteria.
Those points above were so minor that they are not worthy of putting this article on hold. You can address to them if you would like but in all honesty I think the article meets the GA criteria as it is. The prose is excellent and clear, the references are fine and the lead both summarises the article well and complies per WP:LEAD. I'm sceptical about quick-passing GANs from previous experiences but this article is as broad as it can be regarding a time of day! Well done Tezero. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 19:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
![]() | Afternoon has been listed as one of the
Social sciences and society good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: October 10, 2014. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | A fact from Afternoon appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the
Did you know column on 4 January 2015 (
check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This ![]() It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
This article states: 'The Irish language contains four different words to mark time intervals from late afternoon to nightfall. citation needed'. Isn't this rather unclear? I have looked online to try and find information on this and I can't find anything to back it up. It also says 'citation needed'. Doesn't a citation need sourcing for this? And if nothing can be found, wouldn't it be an idea to consider removing it? H.A.W.C 101 ( talk) 16:48, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
I tink that the picture is not enough representative about the afternoon, it more like evening. From wikipedia article evening : "The evening is the period in which the daylight is decreasing" The image is great though. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.57.69.201 ( talk) 11:02, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
! How on earth did a picture of a ghost make its way onto this page. 'Encyclopedic content must be verifiable' is being severely tried on this occasion. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.4.45.115 ( talk) 16:53, 12 June 2009 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 14:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
I'll leave some initial comments this late afternoon (ho ho ho). ☠
Jag
uar ☠ 14:08, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The tool server is currently down so I had to check the references manually. They all seem to be functioning and I couldn't find any that seemed unreliable (not on this topic anyway). The citations are also in their correct places so this meets the GA criteria.
Those points above were so minor that they are not worthy of putting this article on hold. You can address to them if you would like but in all honesty I think the article meets the GA criteria as it is. The prose is excellent and clear, the references are fine and the lead both summarises the article well and complies per WP:LEAD. I'm sceptical about quick-passing GANs from previous experiences but this article is as broad as it can be regarding a time of day! Well done Tezero. ☠ Jag uar ☠ 19:09, 10 October 2014 (UTC)