This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support speedy move per nom and PC78.
Dicklyon (
talk) 23:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The band is called
The Miracles, not "Miracles", so our disambiguation should say that. And the RFC in question (on a little-watched subpage of the MOS) was contested immediately afterwards as it was a clear no consensus and also garnered less support than a normal RM would. Certainly not a reason to ram through large numbers of changes without any RMs. A change to naming of this magnitude should be discussed at
WT:AT, where the policy on naming is established. —
Amakuru (
talk) 02:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
This article has been
automatically rated by a
bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of
songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join
the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
The following is a closed discussion of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a
move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Support speedy move per nom and PC78.
Dicklyon (
talk) 23:35, 22 September 2019 (UTC)reply
Oppose. The band is called
The Miracles, not "Miracles", so our disambiguation should say that. And the RFC in question (on a little-watched subpage of the MOS) was contested immediately afterwards as it was a clear no consensus and also garnered less support than a normal RM would. Certainly not a reason to ram through large numbers of changes without any RMs. A change to naming of this magnitude should be discussed at
WT:AT, where the policy on naming is established. —
Amakuru (
talk) 02:07, 23 September 2019 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a
requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this
talk page or in a
move review. No further edits should be made to this section.