This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Insects Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Diptera Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Diptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of flies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DipteraWikipedia:WikiProject DipteraTemplate:WikiProject DipteraDiptera articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale. This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

I have evidence confirm that this species no longer belong to genus ochlerotatus.Now it's belong Aedes (Protomacleaya) subgenus.Here the link of information: https://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=126392#null DaikinInverter789 ( talk) 08:45, 7 October 2022 (UTC) reply

Hello {{ping|DaikinInverter789|| [1] does not mention Ochlerotatus, ITIS lists it as a synonym and [2] prefers Ochlerotatus. In any case we must mention the Ochlerotatus synonym. Do you have a reference for the idea that only Aedes may be used? Invasive Spices ( talk) 7 October 2022 (UTC)