![]() | Adventures of Mana has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Adventures of Mana is part of the Mana series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 30, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Adventures of Mana is a remake of the 1991 Game Boy game
Final Fantasy Adventure, which was the first entry in the
Mana series? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
@ Judgesurreal777 and PresN: Do we need one? I have not played this game yet, but RSs say that the plot is exactly the same as in the original game. Wouldn't it be enough to merge the plot section as it is now with gameplay, like how Super Mario Bros.#Gameplay does it? Maybe I'm on the wrong track here, but a dedicated plot section would essentially just be a copy of Final Fantasy Adventure#Plot, right?-- IDV talk 00:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PresN ( talk · contribs) 20:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing... -- Pres N 20:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
All minor points, really; it's a solid article, especially for a remake. Placing on hold. -- Pres N 21:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
@
Brayden96: Can you provide a link to the source that says a Windows version is considered? The way Wikipedia works is that when you add something to an article, you add a reference to the source of the information to the end of that statement. If your source is a website, you'd do something like this: Here is a statement.<ref>http://www.website-supporting-the-statement.com</ref>
The reason for this is that everything needs to be verifiable - the reader needs to be able to check where the facts come from. If you want to read more about this, I recommend the pages
Wikipedia:Citing sources and
Wikipedia:Verifiability.--
IDV
talk
15:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
![]() | Adventures of Mana has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
![]() | Adventures of Mana is part of the Mana series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
![]() | A
fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's
Main Page in the "
Did you know?" column on
March 30, 2016. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that
Adventures of Mana is a remake of the 1991 Game Boy game
Final Fantasy Adventure, which was the first entry in the
Mana series? | ||||||||||||
Current status: Good article |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
@ Judgesurreal777 and PresN: Do we need one? I have not played this game yet, but RSs say that the plot is exactly the same as in the original game. Wouldn't it be enough to merge the plot section as it is now with gameplay, like how Super Mario Bros.#Gameplay does it? Maybe I'm on the wrong track here, but a dedicated plot section would essentially just be a copy of Final Fantasy Adventure#Plot, right?-- IDV talk 00:15, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: PresN ( talk · contribs) 20:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
Reviewing... -- Pres N 20:37, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
All minor points, really; it's a solid article, especially for a remake. Placing on hold. -- Pres N 21:27, 15 March 2016 (UTC)
@
Brayden96: Can you provide a link to the source that says a Windows version is considered? The way Wikipedia works is that when you add something to an article, you add a reference to the source of the information to the end of that statement. If your source is a website, you'd do something like this: Here is a statement.<ref>http://www.website-supporting-the-statement.com</ref>
The reason for this is that everything needs to be verifiable - the reader needs to be able to check where the facts come from. If you want to read more about this, I recommend the pages
Wikipedia:Citing sources and
Wikipedia:Verifiability.--
IDV
talk
15:40, 7 October 2016 (UTC)