![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This New Zealand article has some associated metadata templates to display political party colours and names in election candidate and results tables.
The table below shows the content of these metadata templates.
Advance New Zealand — political party metadata | |||
Color | Shortname | ||
#1987D1 | Advance NZ |
Advance New Zealand has a component party which, according to the Electoral Commission is called the "New Zealand Peoples Party". It's unclear if this is the same party as covered in the article New Zealand People's Party. Are they connected? It's also unclear if the missing apostrophe is intentional. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 00:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
This is especially the case for the "background" section. It doesn't explain what the falling out between the Ross and the leader of the NP was about. No details on the accusations of corruption. Later, it says charges have been bought against 4 people. We don't know who or why, but the article tells us that no National Party MPs were targeted and that Ross is actually the one at fault. The only thing I understand 100% from this section is that the author wants us to come out with a negative opinion of Ross, the rest is unclear.
Also "conspiracism" is not an ideology. Unless Ross self-describes as a conspiracy theorist, please remove this unsourced POV. Mottezen ( talk) 22:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Straight off the bat, this article alleges that Advance NZ main policies represent the political fringe. This is unsubstantiated opinion. On visiting their policy page I could not see anything I considered "fringe".
Then the article alleges that New Zealand Public Party, would be a "conspiracy theory party that spread misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic". This too is highly biased opinion without any substance. Most of what they have said about covid-19 has since been confirmed as scientific fact. There was however a lot uncertainty because expert opinions were and are still divided on many aspects of this "pandemic". Misinformation was shown to have come from official sources like the World Health Organisation, yet you make it sound like NZPP was malevolently spreading lies.
I feel this article was written with a political agenda and a negative bias against Advance NZ I request that personal political opinions be removed and the allegations either substantiated, or retracted. Perduta ( talk) 12:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This New Zealand article has some associated metadata templates to display political party colours and names in election candidate and results tables.
The table below shows the content of these metadata templates.
Advance New Zealand — political party metadata | |||
Color | Shortname | ||
#1987D1 | Advance NZ |
Advance New Zealand has a component party which, according to the Electoral Commission is called the "New Zealand Peoples Party". It's unclear if this is the same party as covered in the article New Zealand People's Party. Are they connected? It's also unclear if the missing apostrophe is intentional. HenryCrun15 ( talk) 00:01, 19 August 2020 (UTC)
This is especially the case for the "background" section. It doesn't explain what the falling out between the Ross and the leader of the NP was about. No details on the accusations of corruption. Later, it says charges have been bought against 4 people. We don't know who or why, but the article tells us that no National Party MPs were targeted and that Ross is actually the one at fault. The only thing I understand 100% from this section is that the author wants us to come out with a negative opinion of Ross, the rest is unclear.
Also "conspiracism" is not an ideology. Unless Ross self-describes as a conspiracy theorist, please remove this unsourced POV. Mottezen ( talk) 22:21, 31 August 2020 (UTC)
Straight off the bat, this article alleges that Advance NZ main policies represent the political fringe. This is unsubstantiated opinion. On visiting their policy page I could not see anything I considered "fringe".
Then the article alleges that New Zealand Public Party, would be a "conspiracy theory party that spread misinformation during the COVID-19 pandemic". This too is highly biased opinion without any substance. Most of what they have said about covid-19 has since been confirmed as scientific fact. There was however a lot uncertainty because expert opinions were and are still divided on many aspects of this "pandemic". Misinformation was shown to have come from official sources like the World Health Organisation, yet you make it sound like NZPP was malevolently spreading lies.
I feel this article was written with a political agenda and a negative bias against Advance NZ I request that personal political opinions be removed and the allegations either substantiated, or retracted. Perduta ( talk) 12:02, 6 October 2020 (UTC)