This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adrian S. Fisher has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reviewed this article according to the GA criteria and have failed the article due to the following reasons.
The article still needs some work for it to pass as a GA. Once you have addressed these issues, consider getting a peer review or having another editor look it over before nominating it again. If you disagree with this review, you can get an alternate review at Wikipedia:Good article review. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 05:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the article has been improved and it is close to GA status. However there are still some remaining issues as follows (listed according to GA requirements):
1. As for the first requirement (It is well written),
2. As for the second requirement (It is factually accurate and verifiable),
3. As for the third requirement (It is broad in its coverage), the article looks compliant.
4. As for the fourth requirement (It is neutral), the article looks compliant.
5. As for the fifth requirement (It is stable), the article looks compliant.
6. As for the sixth requirement (Any images it contains are appropriate), the article looks compliant.
As soon as you're done with them, please contact me and I'll check the article again. Good luck, -- Victor12 04:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I have incorporated all of the above suggestions. Sclarkson 16:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Good luck, -- Victor12 21:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I have incorporated your suggestions. Sclarkson 06:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations! The article has now achieved GA status. Good job. For further improvement it would be a good idea to shorten section titles which are still too long in some cases. Anyway, just a minor thing. Greetings, -- Victor12 01:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 10:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Adrian S. Fisher. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I've returned from a 5 year hiatus from Wikipedia and have lost all editing skills (and there have bee five years of improvements, as well.) I added a small piece of information to an article today... Adrian S. Fisher. Specifically in the section "Return to private law practice and academics." And see footnote 23. I added a citation (footnote 23) to the information (a quote from a 1969 newspaper that is found in the archives of the University of Illinois.) But, I certainly did not get the formatting of the citation correct. Can someone fix it please?
RoyGBivphotos ( talk) 18:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Adrian S. Fisher has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I have reviewed this article according to the GA criteria and have failed the article due to the following reasons.
The article still needs some work for it to pass as a GA. Once you have addressed these issues, consider getting a peer review or having another editor look it over before nominating it again. If you disagree with this review, you can get an alternate review at Wikipedia:Good article review. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. -- Nehrams2020 05:29, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the article has been improved and it is close to GA status. However there are still some remaining issues as follows (listed according to GA requirements):
1. As for the first requirement (It is well written),
2. As for the second requirement (It is factually accurate and verifiable),
3. As for the third requirement (It is broad in its coverage), the article looks compliant.
4. As for the fourth requirement (It is neutral), the article looks compliant.
5. As for the fifth requirement (It is stable), the article looks compliant.
6. As for the sixth requirement (Any images it contains are appropriate), the article looks compliant.
As soon as you're done with them, please contact me and I'll check the article again. Good luck, -- Victor12 04:25, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
I have incorporated all of the above suggestions. Sclarkson 16:22, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Good luck, -- Victor12 21:32, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
I have incorporated your suggestions. Sclarkson 06:01, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Congratulations! The article has now achieved GA status. Good job. For further improvement it would be a good idea to shorten section titles which are still too long in some cases. Anyway, just a minor thing. Greetings, -- Victor12 01:08, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Ruslik 10:06, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on
Adrian S. Fisher. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 16:22, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
I've returned from a 5 year hiatus from Wikipedia and have lost all editing skills (and there have bee five years of improvements, as well.) I added a small piece of information to an article today... Adrian S. Fisher. Specifically in the section "Return to private law practice and academics." And see footnote 23. I added a citation (footnote 23) to the information (a quote from a 1969 newspaper that is found in the archives of the University of Illinois.) But, I certainly did not get the formatting of the citation correct. Can someone fix it please?
RoyGBivphotos ( talk) 18:29, 14 March 2016 (UTC)