From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk) 11:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    There's something wrong with the reference to the Mackensens; do you mean the Ersatz Yorcks? The Mackensens had 35cm guns, not 38s.
    That's what Brit Intelligence was reporting at the time; I've clarified it through a note.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC) reply
    Looks good, but you might also want to mention that Germany was in fact building four Mackensens, not three. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    One other thing: the external link doesn't seem to be working. Other than that everything looks pretty good. Just fix the bit about the Mackensens/Ersatz Yorcks and this article will be ready for GA. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply
    Fixed the link.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC) reply
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

Article ( | visual edit | history) · Article talk ( | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Parsecboy ( talk) 11:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:
    B. MoS compliance:
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:
    There's something wrong with the reference to the Mackensens; do you mean the Ersatz Yorcks? The Mackensens had 35cm guns, not 38s.
    That's what Brit Intelligence was reporting at the time; I've clarified it through a note.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC) reply
    Looks good, but you might also want to mention that Germany was in fact building four Mackensens, not three. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:26, 1 June 2010 (UTC) reply
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
    C. No original research:
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:
    B. Focused:
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:
    One other thing: the external link doesn't seem to be working. Other than that everything looks pretty good. Just fix the bit about the Mackensens/Ersatz Yorcks and this article will be ready for GA. Parsecboy ( talk) 11:36, 28 May 2010 (UTC) reply
    Fixed the link.-- Sturmvogel 66 ( talk) 02:58, 30 May 2010 (UTC) reply

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook