![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think somebody is trolling. I can't find a source for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.36.65 ( talk) 14:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
No, it's definitely official. I'll find a source, but I'm overworked. I have a PHD in ball design so please trust me on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.36.77 ( talk) 22:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
The diaspora is real enough (even if I don't remember ever seeing it called by that name before), but "Brazuca" is simply self-applied slang from "brazilian". It is quite informal a word, but not usually pejorative. I'll correct the text. Luis Dantas ( talk) 13:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Dear all. I wanted to get some ideas of how other contributors feels about something, and how to handle it. I'm cross-posting to Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup as well as it involves that page. Certainly on the main Adidas Brazuca there are contributor(s) who feel that the ball is made in Pakistan is worthy of putting in the introductory paragraph. This is despite (1) the fact it is misleading as it is also made in China, and (2) it is mentioned in the production section of the page. I also feel that it is not notable enough to go in the main introduction section. This also applies to the paragraph in 2014 FIFA World Cup where this statement gets repeatedly inserted, where I think it is something that can be seen in the main Adidas Brazuca page. The comment on adding it to the Brazuca page is "Why this gets removed? Hate mongering against Pakistan?". Eventually I will run up to the three revert rule and was seeking concensus with the group how to handle it: (a) delete it, (b) keep it and also add in it is made in China? - With Thanks Master Of Ninja ( talk) 16:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adidas Brazuca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I think somebody is trolling. I can't find a source for that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.139.36.65 ( talk) 14:00, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
No, it's definitely official. I'll find a source, but I'm overworked. I have a PHD in ball design so please trust me on this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.232.36.77 ( talk) 22:15, 17 April 2013 (UTC)
The diaspora is real enough (even if I don't remember ever seeing it called by that name before), but "Brazuca" is simply self-applied slang from "brazilian". It is quite informal a word, but not usually pejorative. I'll correct the text. Luis Dantas ( talk) 13:08, 3 December 2012 (UTC)
Dear all. I wanted to get some ideas of how other contributors feels about something, and how to handle it. I'm cross-posting to Talk:2014 FIFA World Cup as well as it involves that page. Certainly on the main Adidas Brazuca there are contributor(s) who feel that the ball is made in Pakistan is worthy of putting in the introductory paragraph. This is despite (1) the fact it is misleading as it is also made in China, and (2) it is mentioned in the production section of the page. I also feel that it is not notable enough to go in the main introduction section. This also applies to the paragraph in 2014 FIFA World Cup where this statement gets repeatedly inserted, where I think it is something that can be seen in the main Adidas Brazuca page. The comment on adding it to the Brazuca page is "Why this gets removed? Hate mongering against Pakistan?". Eventually I will run up to the three revert rule and was seeking concensus with the group how to handle it: (a) delete it, (b) keep it and also add in it is made in China? - With Thanks Master Of Ninja ( talk) 16:18, 16 June 2014 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adidas Brazuca. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 21:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)