![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added the pov tag due to phrases like...
However impressive the tome is, this clearly isn't a neutral presentation of it.
The rest of the article is frighteningly essay-like, but being unfamiliar with the subject as I am, I would rather someone else make the necessary changes. A Sikh, for example. Hopefully one who can add references too. Pascal ( talk) 07:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Dictation of the Guru Granth Saheb.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
I posted this on the Guru Granth Sahib page, but since nobody answered, I put it here...
I am not very familiar with sikhism, but from what I read in Wikipedia I see no real difference between these two designations. I read in the Talk page of Guru Granth Sahib that Adi Granth is an early recension of the Guru Granth Sahib, but on the article page (and here in Adi Granth, Sikh scriptures and Sikh gurus) both names are treated as synonyms, with the only difference that I can see on these pages being that Guru Granth Sahib is a title (the status of living Guru) bestowed upon the Adi Granth. But, are there two different sets of texts? Is Adi Granth an "historical" term only? Is Adi Granth just a part of Guru Granth Sahib? Do sikhs call their scripture "Adi Granth" or not? Is it worthy to mention them separately, as if they were really two different texts, or is it enough to say that the Adi Granth had a first version by the Fifth Guru, and a later addition by the Tenth Guru, but it's still the Adi Granth, also called Guru Granth Sahib since it was considered the living Guru?
Please, again excuse my ignorance on the subject. I would very much appreciate clarification on these issues, and to see that clarification included on the respective pages, since, as it is now, I don't see the specific need of having three different pages (Adi Granth, Guru Granth Sahib, Sikh scriptures) on this subject. To me it is more confusing than illuminating. -- Nazroon ( talk) 17:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I added the pov tag due to phrases like...
However impressive the tome is, this clearly isn't a neutral presentation of it.
The rest of the article is frighteningly essay-like, but being unfamiliar with the subject as I am, I would rather someone else make the necessary changes. A Sikh, for example. Hopefully one who can add references too. Pascal ( talk) 07:39, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
An image used in this article,
File:Dictation of the Guru Granth Saheb.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at
Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests November 2011
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
This notification is provided by a Bot -- CommonsNotificationBot ( talk) 12:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC) |
I posted this on the Guru Granth Sahib page, but since nobody answered, I put it here...
I am not very familiar with sikhism, but from what I read in Wikipedia I see no real difference between these two designations. I read in the Talk page of Guru Granth Sahib that Adi Granth is an early recension of the Guru Granth Sahib, but on the article page (and here in Adi Granth, Sikh scriptures and Sikh gurus) both names are treated as synonyms, with the only difference that I can see on these pages being that Guru Granth Sahib is a title (the status of living Guru) bestowed upon the Adi Granth. But, are there two different sets of texts? Is Adi Granth an "historical" term only? Is Adi Granth just a part of Guru Granth Sahib? Do sikhs call their scripture "Adi Granth" or not? Is it worthy to mention them separately, as if they were really two different texts, or is it enough to say that the Adi Granth had a first version by the Fifth Guru, and a later addition by the Tenth Guru, but it's still the Adi Granth, also called Guru Granth Sahib since it was considered the living Guru?
Please, again excuse my ignorance on the subject. I would very much appreciate clarification on these issues, and to see that clarification included on the respective pages, since, as it is now, I don't see the specific need of having three different pages (Adi Granth, Guru Granth Sahib, Sikh scriptures) on this subject. To me it is more confusing than illuminating. -- Nazroon ( talk) 17:27, 18 December 2012 (UTC)