![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
The second sentence in this article starts like this: "It is a coastal city beside the Southern Ocean,"... I changed this in ..."beside the Indian Ocean"... A few hours later I was reverted with the comment that Australians still perceive it as the Southern Ocean. That doesn't seem to be very NPOV to me.
I do not doubt that Australians perceive it as such (I have travelled extensively in Australia), but when you click through to Southern Ocean the article states that this ocean ends at 60° S. Adelaide does not lie between the South Pole and 60° S.
I believe my change was correct, but the article should also state that many Australians do not agree with the fact that Adelaide sits beside the Indian Ocean. WHB 11:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. Shouldn't the article then explain that from the Australian viewpoint Adelaide does border the Southern Ocean, but for (most of) the rest of the world it borders the Indian Ocean? WHB 19:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
As long as Australia is not described as being "in" either the Pacific or Indian oceans, but separating them, I think this is sufficiently accurate. If not, I wonder which oceans the Americas and Africa sit "in" (not separate)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanBrodman ( talk • contribs) 06:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello all,
Now that the article has
a good aerial photograph
, does anyone fancy having a go at creating a legend for it using the
Overlay template? It could be used in the same way it was in the
Brisbane article. Cheers -
Gobeirne (
talk)
19:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
In the introduction, the use of the word "province" for the state of South Australia is wrong.
South Australia, like all the other states of Australia, were "colonies" until federation on 1-1-1901. None of them have ever been known as "provinces".
Was the author of this article Australian? It seems such a strange error to make. Maybe he/she thinks we are the Canada of the south. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanBrodman ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Just came across an interesting detail from Adelaide. Appears that ugg boots were first created by an Adelaidean in the 1960s! Still trying to get cross-confirmation from other sources though. See comment by User:Daveosaurus. Btw, if anyone else is interested in helping getting a more balanced perspective in the Ugg boots article, please step forward. The article has been targeted by the overseas holder of trademark 'ugg' (not recognised in Australia) which is determined to add a commercial bias. Donama ( talk) 06:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
third paragraph contains a citation needed followed by a citation. why? is this citation not good enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altormainstream ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I've been drafting a template here to put at the bottom of article about the streets in the Adelaide CBD grid. Suggestions? Should we include notable lanes or North Adelaide also? It is based on the one used for Melbourne Hoddle grid, which is at the bottom of the Melbourne CBD street articles. Feel welcome to pitch in and edit there. Donama ( talk) 07:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Both Melbourne and Sydney mention the term for their residents in the first paragraph. The word Adelaidean is buried in demographics and yet is not immediately obvious. If indeed this is the correct term, then it should be in the introductory paragraph. -- CloudSurfer ( talk) 11:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
isn't the term Radelaidean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.242.104 ( talk) 17:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Not unless this is the reference to the current SA Premier, Mike Rann. Boron eye ( talk) 11:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
The reference provided http://www.adelaide.edu.au/adelaidean does not show that a resident of Adelaide is an Adelaidean. It is a University of Adelaide publication so if it demonstrates anything it is that a graduate or student at Adelaide University is an Adelaidean. If the term "Adelaidean" was a common term (by "common" I mean common enough to warrant it being in the lead), a clear and unambiguous reference would be easy to find. I'll add it's waaaaay out of balance putting it in the 1st paragraph too. The first paragraph should summarise the article. Compared to the other things in the 1st para - all well known and easily referenced - the little used adjective "Adelaidean" is out of place. Adpete ( talk) 02:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Needs an update. Map of overseas-born residents has changed vastly since 2006, with many more South Asians and Africans moving to Adelaide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.135.140 ( talk) 12:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I changed "Queen Adelaide, the German-born consort of King William IV" to "Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen, Queen of the United Kingdom as the wife of King William IV" because it is more accurate and more precise. She was not born in Germany (German Empire forming 80 years after her birth and 20 years after her death) and it does not hurt to specify what she was queen of and that she was queen due as wife of the king. Surtsicna ( talk) 11:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
In case you haven't got quick access to a map of Adelaide suburb boundaries, just wanted to paste this link in. Perhaps there's a spot where this could be put for future reference? http://www.health.sa.gov.au/mentalhealth/Portals/0/metro-suburbs-sa-090928.pdf Donama ( talk) 23:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Are Santos still based in Adelaide now that the tallest building itself, regardless of the residence, has been rebadged from Santos to Westpac? Timeshift 20:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Woodside is actually Australia's largest oil company, not Santos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.134.200 ( talk) 13:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Wayne - I'm pretty sure the front page of yesterday's Australian was suggesting that renewable energy targets are responsible for about half of the recent rise in electricity prices in SA (and the carbon tax the other half). It certainly can't be used as a reference for the assertion that privatisation and price gouging is responsible. The claims are completely unreferenced, and an Enron-style scam like you've described will require pretty good sources. Also, I don't think that we need a detailed description of the politics and scandal of ETSA over the last ten years in this article - that'd probably belong more in Energy in South Australia, which is currently a dog's breakfast and not something I'm eager to tackle just yet. -- Yeti Hunter ( talk) 08:30, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
The current image illustrating Flinders isn't clear, most of the trees obscure the actual building and its basically just parkland. Including a picture of the humanities section of Flinders is the way to go, especially considering that division is ranked one of the best in the country and the building is depicted clearly. 124.182.244.133 ( talk) 12:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
How can this article be a "good article" without a picture of the city? Other users on here have also mentioned it but no one seems to care. Can someone please upload a photo of the city?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.90.219.63 ( talk • contribs) 04:35, 23 June 2007 (ACST).
The annual sunshine hours are plainly incorrect. There has been error in adding bom stats.
Adelaide has at least 2600 hrs to 2700 depending on which weather station. The 2300 mentioned is less than melb and a significant error — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
124.176.98.130 (
talk)
10:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I think it is Australian city. On this page are few photos and you wouldn't place photo of china town because it is small enclave and Australians live in this country and Adelaide. chinese are small grup they have your country and cities and they have enclave in many parts of world. According to me photo of china town is unusual. 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 14:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I think we should remove this photo because it looks horrible on page about Adelaide 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 14:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
That's why I mentioned them. (i.e. because they are already on the page.)
In my opinion you make huge mistake. - Yes, we know you think that.
What we don't understand is WHY you think that.
We have all gone to quite a bit of effort to try to explain to you why we think differently from you.
And you have been quite thorough in making sure we are aware that you are unhappy.
But I'm afraid that I don't really understand just what it is that you are unhappy about.
Cheers,
Pdfpdf (
talk)
11:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea if you were in Adelaide but I haven never been in Adelaide. When I see this photo I imagine Adelaide as Chinese city. This is caused by you. You cheat most users of wikipedia and everybody imagine Adelaide as Chinese city. Cheers 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 19:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I write about Adelaide but I am not happy very much that articles about Sydney and Melbourne are similar photos because on one article about Australian city can be photo of China town. Photos of china town and districts which are on Sydney article and Melbourne article. It is too much photos of China town on articles about Australian cities. I can accept photo on Adelaide article but that you place similar photos on articles about Sydney and Melbourne. We can't say that Australia is China but photos of China town on articles about 3 Australian cities suggest it. I like Chines but photos of this culture can be placed on articles about Chinese cities. Cheers 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 17:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I think Chinese are mionority in Australia. You placed few photos of Adelaide and why did you placed photo of China Town. China town are in a lot of cities in the world for example: London, Toronto. Cheers Revision as of 03:15, 12 December 2010 62.141.215.28
Dear 62.141.209.167, 62.141.213.8 and 62.141.215.28.
You have asked the same or similar questions several times, and have got the same or similar very polite answers from a variety different of people, several times.
Hence, WE ALL KNOW YOUR OPINION. And also, WE ALL DISAGREE WITH YOU. (Also, PLEASE SIGN YOUR MESSAGES WITH 4~.)
If any of the above sentences are NOT clear, please do not hesitate to ask for clarification, and one of us will happily do so.
But please, do not continue to repeat yourself (yourselves?) and please do not continue to ignore our replies.
Pdfpdf (
talk)
11:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
You've got to be kidding me. Here I thought that it was a fly-by IP that was removing the Chinatown photo in recent days for whatever reason. But the whole time, it's part of a wider campaign to have the Adelaide article look all anglo-saxon and misrepresentative. Incredible.
Wikipedia works off consensus. We have a consensus to have the photo there. If you don't like it, you're welcome to your views but it is not a consensus view. The photo stays. Timeshift ( talk) 23:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Why have you placed this photo in article about Queen Charlotte?! Article about Queen Charlotte has the same connection with this photo as article about Adelaide. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.141.215.217 ( talk) 15:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC) I can't unterstand you. We should create Australian culture in article about city of Australia. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.141.215.217 ( talk) 17:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I can't believe the Chinatown image is getting removed again. Why? Can we temporarily get IP protection on this page? Timeshift ( talk) 02:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
The addition of such a detailed section on one particular ethnic or religious group seems a bit anomalous for a general article - there are many different groups (Scots, Welsh, Irish, German, Afghan, Chinese, Greek, Italian, Vietnamese, etc., to name just a few) which have emigrated to Adelaide over the course of its history and made significant contributions to its present-day culture. To include sections on each and every one of them in this article would make it overly long. Perhaps this section could be moved to a separate article on "Multicultural influences on Adelaide's development and culture". Cheers, Bahudhara ( talk) 08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
(Perhaps this is a new/separate topic, rather than a sub-topic?)
Extending on from Bahudhara's opening ... (Yes, this looks like a minefield to me - let's see if I can enter it without being blown to bits? After all, in my opinion, Bahudhara seems to have made a good start!)
Looking at pictures, we have one of the Catholic Cathedral, two of the Mosque, none of the Anglican Cathedral, and none of the Synagogue. Nor any of any of the other "Protestant" or "Non-Christian" religions.
It seems obvious to me, (though perhaps not to others) that pictures of the Catholic Cathedral and the Anglican Cathedral should be included.
Beyond that, we could chose "attractive" or "interesting" pictures, but the subjective nature of this is problematic. (e.g. Personally, I think Clayton church on the corner of Portrush Road and the Parade is attractive, but then, Scots church and Holy Trinity Church, Adelaide, both on North Terrace, are similarly attractive. And others, too. etc., ad infinitum)
What do others think? Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Why arent the sister cities of adelaide put up on this page? They were added but removed by user CJ because s/he stated that the cities of Wuhan, Austin, Christchurch, Georgetown and Himeji were sister cities of the city of adelaide (5000) not the metro area of adelaide. however all of the formention cities have links to this page as the sister city of their city rather than the City of Adelaide. i think that this is the page that should show adelaide's sister cities rather than that of the City of Adelaide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.1.196 ( talk) 12:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a joke. Councils may create the sister city relationships but those relationships are not between the councils but the greater metropolitan areas! How can a council of 20,000 people, roughly the size of Murray Bridge, have a sister relationship with Houston? Or Chinese cities of over 5 million? Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 12:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Quit trolling.
We have the same situation as Melbourne yet we cannot choose the correct decision? In Himeji the footpath has plaques for al its sister cities and for Adelaide it says Adelaide! Not "The City of Adelaide" or the "City of Adelaide council". It is a disgrace that we dont have our sister cities shown on this page. Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 12:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
This is reconcilable considering councils have sister councils ala Brooklyn#Partnerships_with_districts_of_foreign_cities Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 13:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
I suggest that Adelaide's suburban residential areas are characterised by single-storey detached houses; I suggest that double-storey detached houses are still very much in the small minority. What do others think? Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I agree, I think we should get rid of that photo. Double-storey homes are a rarity in Adelaide, and the 'dutch colonial style', I think, isn't really that prominent either. A photo of the standard one-storey suburban brick home would be a much more accurate inclusion. Jordan85 ( talk) 00:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
The photo has reappeared. I've deleted it again. I just don't think its a good representation of Adelaide at all, as this style of home and two-storey homes are extremely uncommon in Adelaide. Jordan85 ( talk) 20:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
For some reason, every time I view this on my phone, the black bar is thicker to the right. The problem disappears on the web. But for those who view this on their phone, it's going to look bad. Any ideas? Ashton 29 ( talk) 00:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Soem figures need to be reconciled on this page. The infobox gives metropolitan Adelaide an area of 1,826.9 km2, while the "Geography" section of the article quotes a figure of 870 km2 from the ABS but doesn't cite the information. Which area does the population figure in the infobox correspond to? Is it simply that one number is now outdated? From my understanding, the ABS swtiched from the Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) to the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) between Censuses, so maybe this is the reason for the discrepency? The smaller number looks like it could be the old Statistical District (SD) definition, and the larger number looks like it could be the new Greater Capital City Statistical Area (GCCSA) definition. Or, maybe both the numbers are updated, but the infobox is comparing the GCCSA to an Urban Centre definition in the Geography section. Either way, this needs to be made clear and corrected so we have an apples-to-apples comparison on the page. -- Criticalthinker ( talk) 12:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.
This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.
In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 11 external links on
Adelaide. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Adelaide. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
An infobox for a city should provide images of its most iconic landmarks.
Currently the inbox for Adelaide has...
Ideally we should have
Infobox photos should first illustrate what the subject matter is before being an artistic photo.
Glenelg
Adelaide Oval
Rundle Mall
Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 05:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
If the events described in this morning's article on the predicted Adelaide tsunami
happened today I imagine we'd end up having a Wikipedia article for it. Any thoughts? Anyone here who was around then and remembers it? I don't think my parents ever mentioned it. I just had some vague idea that there was a flamboyant premier called Dunstan who did some media stunt in pink shorts at the end of one of the jetties! Donama ( talk) 23:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Adelaide. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The summary of Adelaide hospitals in the Health section on this page is quite good, but I feel like the other articles on Adelaide's hospitals are a bit of a mess and hard to follow. I've drafted a template to catch them all together at User:Donama/Template:Hospitals in Adelaide in case it can be useful. See also List of hospitals in Australia#South Australia, which does not appear to be correct or complete. Anyone putting up their hand to work on this would be great! Donama ( talk) 06:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
It's mere history now, but anyone think we need an article on Glenside Hospital with redirects from Parkside Mental Hospital and Parkside Lunatic Asylum? The Glenside, South Australia article barely mentions it yet in local minds aged 25 and over the word 'Glenside' is synonymous with the now-closed institution. ABC has a history of the institution here (11 May 2011). Donama ( talk) 03:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
What the hell is with our choice of infobox photos. Are we trying to put people to sleep? Why is the shot of our CBD taken from a million miles away. A fountain? Where the hell is Adelaide Oval? Some nice sandy beaches? The wine centre? Worst infobox ever. Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 13:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
User:MartinSFSA has added Adelaide's sister cities, with the edit comment " →Governance: Adding sister cities again ... please give a detailed explanation if removing." I am about to remove them, so my detailed rationale is that the five cities listed are not sister cities of Adelaide, they are sister cities of the City of Adelaide, which is a much smaller entity. Some of the other local government areas in greater Adelaide may also have sister cities (for example City of Elizabeth used to, but I'm not sure if City of Playford has maintained the relationships). -- Scott Davis Talk 06:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
This article incorrectly defines the capital city of South Australia as "Adelaide" (i.e. the greater metropolitan area) rather than the "City of Adelaide". The capital city is defined by the City of Adelaide Act 1998 [3] as being the City of Adelaide. This only includes the Adelaide City Council area as defined by the legislation and not all the other areas as referenced by this wiki (i.e. it does not include the rest of suburban Adelaide). I think this needs to be changed blah ( talk) 04:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Current diff lists the area of Adelaide as 16km^2, which is barely the size of the city centre. Even the City of Adelaide LGA is about 4 times that size. This ref gives an area of Greater Adelaide as 325,766 hectares (3,257.66 km2), however this will make the population density statistic anomalous. Should this article list the area of Greater Adelaide, the Adealide Metropolitan Area, or the City of Adelaide? Or all three? In any case, the uncited area of 16 square kilometres needs to change. -- Yeti Hunter ( talk) 00:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to WMAU I have been digitizing 35mm slides here in Perth taken by EW Digby, I thought you might appreciate this gem Gnan garra 11:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
In this edit I removed a citation that didn't mention anything about the content. It was promptly replaced with another link to the same source. This is worthless: if a citation doesn't have the information that's given, don't try to trick people into thinking that it does. 64.203.186.95 ( talk) 13:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
This has not been rectified for a long period of time now. Despite some excellent Adelaide photographs of notable landmarks we are stuck with a pigeon fountain, non descriptive rocks and a significantly old skyline image. The last time I tried to change this it resulted in an edit war. Are people happy with the boring images? Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 04:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Article states 28 December 1836, but that is the date Hindmarsh came ashore and read the proclamation establishing the Province of South Australia. Adelaide did not exist at that time, and William Light did not even select a site for the new city until March 1837. 1.147.57.171 ( talk) 09:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 |
The second sentence in this article starts like this: "It is a coastal city beside the Southern Ocean,"... I changed this in ..."beside the Indian Ocean"... A few hours later I was reverted with the comment that Australians still perceive it as the Southern Ocean. That doesn't seem to be very NPOV to me.
I do not doubt that Australians perceive it as such (I have travelled extensively in Australia), but when you click through to Southern Ocean the article states that this ocean ends at 60° S. Adelaide does not lie between the South Pole and 60° S.
I believe my change was correct, but the article should also state that many Australians do not agree with the fact that Adelaide sits beside the Indian Ocean. WHB 11:34, 16 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for your explanation. Shouldn't the article then explain that from the Australian viewpoint Adelaide does border the Southern Ocean, but for (most of) the rest of the world it borders the Indian Ocean? WHB 19:10, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
As long as Australia is not described as being "in" either the Pacific or Indian oceans, but separating them, I think this is sufficiently accurate. If not, I wonder which oceans the Americas and Africa sit "in" (not separate)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanBrodman ( talk • contribs) 06:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Hello all,
Now that the article has
a good aerial photograph
, does anyone fancy having a go at creating a legend for it using the
Overlay template? It could be used in the same way it was in the
Brisbane article. Cheers -
Gobeirne (
talk)
19:46, 28 September 2009 (UTC)
In the introduction, the use of the word "province" for the state of South Australia is wrong.
South Australia, like all the other states of Australia, were "colonies" until federation on 1-1-1901. None of them have ever been known as "provinces".
Was the author of this article Australian? It seems such a strange error to make. Maybe he/she thinks we are the Canada of the south. —Preceding unsigned comment added by DanBrodman ( talk • contribs) 06:28, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Just came across an interesting detail from Adelaide. Appears that ugg boots were first created by an Adelaidean in the 1960s! Still trying to get cross-confirmation from other sources though. See comment by User:Daveosaurus. Btw, if anyone else is interested in helping getting a more balanced perspective in the Ugg boots article, please step forward. The article has been targeted by the overseas holder of trademark 'ugg' (not recognised in Australia) which is determined to add a commercial bias. Donama ( talk) 06:07, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
third paragraph contains a citation needed followed by a citation. why? is this citation not good enough? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Altormainstream ( talk • contribs) 12:49, 25 September 2010 (UTC)
I've been drafting a template here to put at the bottom of article about the streets in the Adelaide CBD grid. Suggestions? Should we include notable lanes or North Adelaide also? It is based on the one used for Melbourne Hoddle grid, which is at the bottom of the Melbourne CBD street articles. Feel welcome to pitch in and edit there. Donama ( talk) 07:35, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Both Melbourne and Sydney mention the term for their residents in the first paragraph. The word Adelaidean is buried in demographics and yet is not immediately obvious. If indeed this is the correct term, then it should be in the introductory paragraph. -- CloudSurfer ( talk) 11:07, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
isn't the term Radelaidean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.8.242.104 ( talk) 17:01, 27 May 2009 (UTC) Not unless this is the reference to the current SA Premier, Mike Rann. Boron eye ( talk) 11:27, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
The reference provided http://www.adelaide.edu.au/adelaidean does not show that a resident of Adelaide is an Adelaidean. It is a University of Adelaide publication so if it demonstrates anything it is that a graduate or student at Adelaide University is an Adelaidean. If the term "Adelaidean" was a common term (by "common" I mean common enough to warrant it being in the lead), a clear and unambiguous reference would be easy to find. I'll add it's waaaaay out of balance putting it in the 1st paragraph too. The first paragraph should summarise the article. Compared to the other things in the 1st para - all well known and easily referenced - the little used adjective "Adelaidean" is out of place. Adpete ( talk) 02:26, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
Needs an update. Map of overseas-born residents has changed vastly since 2006, with many more South Asians and Africans moving to Adelaide. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.239.135.140 ( talk) 12:49, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
I changed "Queen Adelaide, the German-born consort of King William IV" to "Adelaide of Saxe-Meiningen, Queen of the United Kingdom as the wife of King William IV" because it is more accurate and more precise. She was not born in Germany (German Empire forming 80 years after her birth and 20 years after her death) and it does not hurt to specify what she was queen of and that she was queen due as wife of the king. Surtsicna ( talk) 11:54, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
In case you haven't got quick access to a map of Adelaide suburb boundaries, just wanted to paste this link in. Perhaps there's a spot where this could be put for future reference? http://www.health.sa.gov.au/mentalhealth/Portals/0/metro-suburbs-sa-090928.pdf Donama ( talk) 23:12, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Are Santos still based in Adelaide now that the tallest building itself, regardless of the residence, has been rebadged from Santos to Westpac? Timeshift 20:55, 12 August 2007 (UTC)
Woodside is actually Australia's largest oil company, not Santos. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.38.134.200 ( talk) 13:16, 29 December 2011 (UTC)
Wayne - I'm pretty sure the front page of yesterday's Australian was suggesting that renewable energy targets are responsible for about half of the recent rise in electricity prices in SA (and the carbon tax the other half). It certainly can't be used as a reference for the assertion that privatisation and price gouging is responsible. The claims are completely unreferenced, and an Enron-style scam like you've described will require pretty good sources. Also, I don't think that we need a detailed description of the politics and scandal of ETSA over the last ten years in this article - that'd probably belong more in Energy in South Australia, which is currently a dog's breakfast and not something I'm eager to tackle just yet. -- Yeti Hunter ( talk) 08:30, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
The current image illustrating Flinders isn't clear, most of the trees obscure the actual building and its basically just parkland. Including a picture of the humanities section of Flinders is the way to go, especially considering that division is ranked one of the best in the country and the building is depicted clearly. 124.182.244.133 ( talk) 12:46, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
How can this article be a "good article" without a picture of the city? Other users on here have also mentioned it but no one seems to care. Can someone please upload a photo of the city?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 219.90.219.63 ( talk • contribs) 04:35, 23 June 2007 (ACST).
The annual sunshine hours are plainly incorrect. There has been error in adding bom stats.
Adelaide has at least 2600 hrs to 2700 depending on which weather station. The 2300 mentioned is less than melb and a significant error — Preceding
unsigned comment added by
124.176.98.130 (
talk)
10:13, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
I think it is Australian city. On this page are few photos and you wouldn't place photo of china town because it is small enclave and Australians live in this country and Adelaide. chinese are small grup they have your country and cities and they have enclave in many parts of world. According to me photo of china town is unusual. 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 14:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
I think we should remove this photo because it looks horrible on page about Adelaide 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 14:24, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
That's why I mentioned them. (i.e. because they are already on the page.)
In my opinion you make huge mistake. - Yes, we know you think that.
What we don't understand is WHY you think that.
We have all gone to quite a bit of effort to try to explain to you why we think differently from you.
And you have been quite thorough in making sure we are aware that you are unhappy.
But I'm afraid that I don't really understand just what it is that you are unhappy about.
Cheers,
Pdfpdf (
talk)
11:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I have no idea if you were in Adelaide but I haven never been in Adelaide. When I see this photo I imagine Adelaide as Chinese city. This is caused by you. You cheat most users of wikipedia and everybody imagine Adelaide as Chinese city. Cheers 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 19:41, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
I write about Adelaide but I am not happy very much that articles about Sydney and Melbourne are similar photos because on one article about Australian city can be photo of China town. Photos of china town and districts which are on Sydney article and Melbourne article. It is too much photos of China town on articles about Australian cities. I can accept photo on Adelaide article but that you place similar photos on articles about Sydney and Melbourne. We can't say that Australia is China but photos of China town on articles about 3 Australian cities suggest it. I like Chines but photos of this culture can be placed on articles about Chinese cities. Cheers 62.141.209.167 ( talk) 17:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
I think Chinese are mionority in Australia. You placed few photos of Adelaide and why did you placed photo of China Town. China town are in a lot of cities in the world for example: London, Toronto. Cheers Revision as of 03:15, 12 December 2010 62.141.215.28
Dear 62.141.209.167, 62.141.213.8 and 62.141.215.28.
You have asked the same or similar questions several times, and have got the same or similar very polite answers from a variety different of people, several times.
Hence, WE ALL KNOW YOUR OPINION. And also, WE ALL DISAGREE WITH YOU. (Also, PLEASE SIGN YOUR MESSAGES WITH 4~.)
If any of the above sentences are NOT clear, please do not hesitate to ask for clarification, and one of us will happily do so.
But please, do not continue to repeat yourself (yourselves?) and please do not continue to ignore our replies.
Pdfpdf (
talk)
11:43, 15 December 2010 (UTC)
You've got to be kidding me. Here I thought that it was a fly-by IP that was removing the Chinatown photo in recent days for whatever reason. But the whole time, it's part of a wider campaign to have the Adelaide article look all anglo-saxon and misrepresentative. Incredible.
Wikipedia works off consensus. We have a consensus to have the photo there. If you don't like it, you're welcome to your views but it is not a consensus view. The photo stays. Timeshift ( talk) 23:10, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Why have you placed this photo in article about Queen Charlotte?! Article about Queen Charlotte has the same connection with this photo as article about Adelaide. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.141.215.217 ( talk) 15:15, 26 October 2011 (UTC) I can't unterstand you. We should create Australian culture in article about city of Australia. Cheers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.141.215.217 ( talk) 17:33, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
I can't believe the Chinatown image is getting removed again. Why? Can we temporarily get IP protection on this page? Timeshift ( talk) 02:49, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
The addition of such a detailed section on one particular ethnic or religious group seems a bit anomalous for a general article - there are many different groups (Scots, Welsh, Irish, German, Afghan, Chinese, Greek, Italian, Vietnamese, etc., to name just a few) which have emigrated to Adelaide over the course of its history and made significant contributions to its present-day culture. To include sections on each and every one of them in this article would make it overly long. Perhaps this section could be moved to a separate article on "Multicultural influences on Adelaide's development and culture". Cheers, Bahudhara ( talk) 08:06, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
(Perhaps this is a new/separate topic, rather than a sub-topic?)
Extending on from Bahudhara's opening ... (Yes, this looks like a minefield to me - let's see if I can enter it without being blown to bits? After all, in my opinion, Bahudhara seems to have made a good start!)
Looking at pictures, we have one of the Catholic Cathedral, two of the Mosque, none of the Anglican Cathedral, and none of the Synagogue. Nor any of any of the other "Protestant" or "Non-Christian" religions.
It seems obvious to me, (though perhaps not to others) that pictures of the Catholic Cathedral and the Anglican Cathedral should be included.
Beyond that, we could chose "attractive" or "interesting" pictures, but the subjective nature of this is problematic. (e.g. Personally, I think Clayton church on the corner of Portrush Road and the Parade is attractive, but then, Scots church and Holy Trinity Church, Adelaide, both on North Terrace, are similarly attractive. And others, too. etc., ad infinitum)
What do others think? Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:14, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
Why arent the sister cities of adelaide put up on this page? They were added but removed by user CJ because s/he stated that the cities of Wuhan, Austin, Christchurch, Georgetown and Himeji were sister cities of the city of adelaide (5000) not the metro area of adelaide. however all of the formention cities have links to this page as the sister city of their city rather than the City of Adelaide. i think that this is the page that should show adelaide's sister cities rather than that of the City of Adelaide. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.178.1.196 ( talk) 12:10, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
This is a joke. Councils may create the sister city relationships but those relationships are not between the councils but the greater metropolitan areas! How can a council of 20,000 people, roughly the size of Murray Bridge, have a sister relationship with Houston? Or Chinese cities of over 5 million? Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 12:00, 5 November 2014 (UTC) Quit trolling.
We have the same situation as Melbourne yet we cannot choose the correct decision? In Himeji the footpath has plaques for al its sister cities and for Adelaide it says Adelaide! Not "The City of Adelaide" or the "City of Adelaide council". It is a disgrace that we dont have our sister cities shown on this page. Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 12:42, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
This is reconcilable considering councils have sister councils ala Brooklyn#Partnerships_with_districts_of_foreign_cities Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 13:10, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
I suggest that Adelaide's suburban residential areas are characterised by single-storey detached houses; I suggest that double-storey detached houses are still very much in the small minority. What do others think? Pdfpdf ( talk) 12:43, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
I agree, I think we should get rid of that photo. Double-storey homes are a rarity in Adelaide, and the 'dutch colonial style', I think, isn't really that prominent either. A photo of the standard one-storey suburban brick home would be a much more accurate inclusion. Jordan85 ( talk) 00:00, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
The photo has reappeared. I've deleted it again. I just don't think its a good representation of Adelaide at all, as this style of home and two-storey homes are extremely uncommon in Adelaide. Jordan85 ( talk) 20:41, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
For some reason, every time I view this on my phone, the black bar is thicker to the right. The problem disappears on the web. But for those who view this on their phone, it's going to look bad. Any ideas? Ashton 29 ( talk) 00:05, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
Soem figures need to be reconciled on this page. The infobox gives metropolitan Adelaide an area of 1,826.9 km2, while the "Geography" section of the article quotes a figure of 870 km2 from the ABS but doesn't cite the information. Which area does the population figure in the infobox correspond to? Is it simply that one number is now outdated? From my understanding, the ABS swtiched from the Australian Standard Geographical Classification (ASGC) to the Australian Statistical Geography Standard (ASGS) between Censuses, so maybe this is the reason for the discrepency? The smaller number looks like it could be the old Statistical District (SD) definition, and the larger number looks like it could be the new Greater Capital City Statistical Area (GCCSA) definition. Or, maybe both the numbers are updated, but the infobox is comparing the GCCSA to an Urban Centre definition in the Geography section. Either way, this needs to be made clear and corrected so we have an apples-to-apples comparison on the page. -- Criticalthinker ( talk) 12:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)
Hello. I am finding myself repeatedly archiving links on this page. This usually happens when the archive doesn't recognize the archive to be good.
This could be because the link is either a redirect, or I am unknowingly archiving a dead link. Please check the following links to see if it's redirecting, or in anyway bad, and fix them, if possible.
In any event this will be the only notification in regards to these links, and I will discontinue my attempts to archive these pages.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 11 external links on
Adelaide. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 18:39, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 3 external links on
Adelaide. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the — cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:11, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
An infobox for a city should provide images of its most iconic landmarks.
Currently the inbox for Adelaide has...
Ideally we should have
Infobox photos should first illustrate what the subject matter is before being an artistic photo.
Glenelg
Adelaide Oval
Rundle Mall
Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 05:15, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
If the events described in this morning's article on the predicted Adelaide tsunami
happened today I imagine we'd end up having a Wikipedia article for it. Any thoughts? Anyone here who was around then and remembers it? I don't think my parents ever mentioned it. I just had some vague idea that there was a flamboyant premier called Dunstan who did some media stunt in pink shorts at the end of one of the jetties! Donama ( talk) 23:03, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on
Adelaide. Please take a moment to review
my edit. If necessary, add {{
cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{
nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
Cheers.— cyberbot II Talk to my owner:Online 08:08, 10 March 2016 (UTC)
The summary of Adelaide hospitals in the Health section on this page is quite good, but I feel like the other articles on Adelaide's hospitals are a bit of a mess and hard to follow. I've drafted a template to catch them all together at User:Donama/Template:Hospitals in Adelaide in case it can be useful. See also List of hospitals in Australia#South Australia, which does not appear to be correct or complete. Anyone putting up their hand to work on this would be great! Donama ( talk) 06:26, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
It's mere history now, but anyone think we need an article on Glenside Hospital with redirects from Parkside Mental Hospital and Parkside Lunatic Asylum? The Glenside, South Australia article barely mentions it yet in local minds aged 25 and over the word 'Glenside' is synonymous with the now-closed institution. ABC has a history of the institution here (11 May 2011). Donama ( talk) 03:18, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 14:17, 11 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{
Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 13 external links on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 18:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Adelaide. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 05:21, 26 July 2017 (UTC)
What the hell is with our choice of infobox photos. Are we trying to put people to sleep? Why is the shot of our CBD taken from a million miles away. A fountain? Where the hell is Adelaide Oval? Some nice sandy beaches? The wine centre? Worst infobox ever. Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 13:35, 16 August 2017 (UTC)
User:MartinSFSA has added Adelaide's sister cities, with the edit comment " →Governance: Adding sister cities again ... please give a detailed explanation if removing." I am about to remove them, so my detailed rationale is that the five cities listed are not sister cities of Adelaide, they are sister cities of the City of Adelaide, which is a much smaller entity. Some of the other local government areas in greater Adelaide may also have sister cities (for example City of Elizabeth used to, but I'm not sure if City of Playford has maintained the relationships). -- Scott Davis Talk 06:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
This article incorrectly defines the capital city of South Australia as "Adelaide" (i.e. the greater metropolitan area) rather than the "City of Adelaide". The capital city is defined by the City of Adelaide Act 1998 [3] as being the City of Adelaide. This only includes the Adelaide City Council area as defined by the legislation and not all the other areas as referenced by this wiki (i.e. it does not include the rest of suburban Adelaide). I think this needs to be changed blah ( talk) 04:54, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
Current diff lists the area of Adelaide as 16km^2, which is barely the size of the city centre. Even the City of Adelaide LGA is about 4 times that size. This ref gives an area of Greater Adelaide as 325,766 hectares (3,257.66 km2), however this will make the population density statistic anomalous. Should this article list the area of Greater Adelaide, the Adealide Metropolitan Area, or the City of Adelaide? Or all three? In any case, the uncited area of 16 square kilometres needs to change. -- Yeti Hunter ( talk) 00:30, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Thanks to WMAU I have been digitizing 35mm slides here in Perth taken by EW Digby, I thought you might appreciate this gem Gnan garra 11:14, 17 July 2020 (UTC)
In this edit I removed a citation that didn't mention anything about the content. It was promptly replaced with another link to the same source. This is worthless: if a citation doesn't have the information that's given, don't try to trick people into thinking that it does. 64.203.186.95 ( talk) 13:41, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
This has not been rectified for a long period of time now. Despite some excellent Adelaide photographs of notable landmarks we are stuck with a pigeon fountain, non descriptive rocks and a significantly old skyline image. The last time I tried to change this it resulted in an edit war. Are people happy with the boring images? Thejoebloggsblog ( talk) 04:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Article states 28 December 1836, but that is the date Hindmarsh came ashore and read the proclamation establishing the Province of South Australia. Adelaide did not exist at that time, and William Light did not even select a site for the new city until March 1837. 1.147.57.171 ( talk) 09:32, 20 September 2022 (UTC)