This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page describes an important standard and should remain on wikipedia. It is no different than its predecessor, the STL, which is also used extensively on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STL_(file_format) -- Hod Lipson
I agree with this. However I can understand why it appears very technical. Could one explain what a vertice is in the context? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.140.38 ( talk) 18:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
The topic meets notability requirements because it is verifyable by an established international third party (ASTM), and it relies on a premanent source (as cited). Additional sources may be added in the future (e.g. ISO). I have asked the hep of the community to add sources and improve clarity. -- Hod Lipson
the format specification can not be obtained freely therefore its is no open format and it should be noted that this entry is probably only existent due to commercial interests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.146.155.252 ( talk) 18:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
This page describes an important standard and should remain on wikipedia. It is no different than its predecessor, the STL, which is also used extensively on wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/STL_(file_format) -- Hod Lipson
I agree with this. However I can understand why it appears very technical. Could one explain what a vertice is in the context? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.6.140.38 ( talk) 18:26, 18 December 2011 (UTC)
The topic meets notability requirements because it is verifyable by an established international third party (ASTM), and it relies on a premanent source (as cited). Additional sources may be added in the future (e.g. ISO). I have asked the hep of the community to add sources and improve clarity. -- Hod Lipson
the format specification can not be obtained freely therefore its is no open format and it should be noted that this entry is probably only existent due to commercial interests. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.146.155.252 ( talk) 18:01, 23 April 2012 (UTC)