Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul 01:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Back again; I will be reviewing this article in the near future, most likely tomorrow. Canadian Paul 01:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Here it is:
Very nice once again, just a few little comments:
To allow for these changes to be made I am placing the article on hold for a period of up to a week. I'm always open to discussion on any of the items, so if you think I'm wrong on something leave your thoughts here and we'll discuss. I'll be checking this page at least daily, unless something comes up, so you can be sure I'll notice any comments left here. You probably knew that already though. Canadian Paul 00:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
Reviewer: Canadian Paul 01:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Back again; I will be reviewing this article in the near future, most likely tomorrow. Canadian Paul 01:56, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
Here it is:
Very nice once again, just a few little comments:
To allow for these changes to be made I am placing the article on hold for a period of up to a week. I'm always open to discussion on any of the items, so if you think I'm wrong on something leave your thoughts here and we'll discuss. I'll be checking this page at least daily, unless something comes up, so you can be sure I'll notice any comments left here. You probably knew that already though. Canadian Paul 00:58, 14 April 2010 (UTC)