| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Action of 17 August 1779 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
.svg)
 | This article was nominated for merging with Armada of 1779 on 2 September 2016. The result of the discussion was No merge. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- No merge after further discussion in June 2017 69.165.196.103 ( talk) 00:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
This article should be merged with Armada of 1779. Discuss. Shire Lord ( talk) 22:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Why?
- It is clearly obvious why. Shire Lord ( talk) 13:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
I can't see nothing obvious, whatever it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rod D ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- The action is part of this campaign, hence the suggestion of it being merged. Shire Lord ( talk) 17:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Such a small action would not have more than a single line in such broad topic as its parent article. For its importance, there's certainly worse around. Uspzor ( talk) 03:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Need more opinions & a consensus. Don't remove unless this is so. Shire Lord ( talk) 08:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it until someone agrees with you, you mean. Keep it forever then, I don't care.
Uspzor (
talk) 19:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well it might stop some puppetry going on for sure.
Shire Lord (
talk) 12:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is my opinion that Uspzor is right and there's no merge necessary. It would be hard fitting more than a sentence or two from this article into
Armada of 1779 without seriously disrupting the prose quality of said article. Having this as a separate article therefore is the more correct option.
69.165.196.103 (
talk) 14:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Is that because you are Uspzor ( talk) and also the same person changing articles concerning the American Revolutionary war over to Anglo-French War? Eastfarthingan ( talk) 23:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- It is my opinion that Uspzor is right and there's no merge necessary. It would be hard fitting more than a sentence or two from this article into
Armada of 1779 without seriously disrupting the prose quality of said article. Having this as a separate article therefore is the more correct option.
69.165.196.103 (
talk) 14:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well it might stop some puppetry going on for sure.
Shire Lord (
talk) 12:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it until someone agrees with you, you mean. Keep it forever then, I don't care.
Uspzor (
talk) 19:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
No. I don't remember touching any article about the American Revolutionary war (except this one where I corrected some grammar) - please look at
my actual edit history before claiming sock-puppetry or other such accusations.
69.165.196.103 (
talk) 23:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Good, no merge then?
Eastfarthingan (
talk) 20:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- No merge. I'll remove the template. 69.165.196.103 ( talk) 00:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Start-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- Start-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles
| This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Action of 17 August 1779 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
|
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was nominated for merging with Armada of 1779 on 2 September 2016. The result of the discussion was No merge. |
- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- No merge after further discussion in June 2017 69.165.196.103 ( talk) 00:54, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
This article should be merged with Armada of 1779. Discuss. Shire Lord ( talk) 22:45, 2 September 2016 (UTC)
Why?
- It is clearly obvious why. Shire Lord ( talk) 13:50, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
I can't see nothing obvious, whatever it is. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rod D ( talk • contribs) 15:40, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- The action is part of this campaign, hence the suggestion of it being merged. Shire Lord ( talk) 17:22, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
- Such a small action would not have more than a single line in such broad topic as its parent article. For its importance, there's certainly worse around. Uspzor ( talk) 03:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Need more opinions & a consensus. Don't remove unless this is so. Shire Lord ( talk) 08:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it until someone agrees with you, you mean. Keep it forever then, I don't care.
Uspzor (
talk) 19:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well it might stop some puppetry going on for sure.
Shire Lord (
talk) 12:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- It is my opinion that Uspzor is right and there's no merge necessary. It would be hard fitting more than a sentence or two from this article into
Armada of 1779 without seriously disrupting the prose quality of said article. Having this as a separate article therefore is the more correct option.
69.165.196.103 (
talk) 14:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Is that because you are Uspzor ( talk) and also the same person changing articles concerning the American Revolutionary war over to Anglo-French War? Eastfarthingan ( talk) 23:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- It is my opinion that Uspzor is right and there's no merge necessary. It would be hard fitting more than a sentence or two from this article into
Armada of 1779 without seriously disrupting the prose quality of said article. Having this as a separate article therefore is the more correct option.
69.165.196.103 (
talk) 14:23, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Well it might stop some puppetry going on for sure.
Shire Lord (
talk) 12:57, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it until someone agrees with you, you mean. Keep it forever then, I don't care.
Uspzor (
talk) 19:53, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
No. I don't remember touching any article about the American Revolutionary war (except this one where I corrected some grammar) - please look at
my actual edit history before claiming sock-puppetry or other such accusations.
69.165.196.103 (
talk) 23:54, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Good, no merge then?
Eastfarthingan (
talk) 20:15, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
- No merge. I'll remove the template. 69.165.196.103 ( talk) 00:49, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Categories:
- Start-Class France articles
- Low-importance France articles
- All WikiProject France pages
- Start-Class military history articles
- Start-Class maritime warfare articles
- Maritime warfare task force articles
- Start-Class British military history articles
- British military history task force articles
- Start-Class European military history articles
- European military history task force articles
- Start-Class French military history articles
- French military history task force articles
- Start-Class Early Modern warfare articles
- Early Modern warfare task force articles
- Start-Class United Kingdom articles
- Low-importance United Kingdom articles
- WikiProject United Kingdom articles