Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This is an interesting and well-written article. At times, I wasn't sure that the tone was encyclopedic; it can seem more like a story than an article. I wasn't sure whether to ask that this be dealt with, but I ultimately decided that I would just be asking you to make the article less engaging. That doesn't seem to be productive, so I only have a few concerns:
GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
I will place this nomination on hold to allow these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions or comments can e left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
As for the "story" comment, I didn't phrase it well. The article is well-written, and it is very engaging. Perhaps that is what I meant to say — I've reviewed 33 nominations this month, and this one stands out as the most interesting and detailed prose. All things considered, though, I'm not convinced that's a bad thing.
I am promoting the article, as I believe that it meets all six of the GA criteria. Congratulations! GaryColemanFan ( talk) 23:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
Article (
|
visual edit |
history) ·
Article talk (
|
history) ·
Watch
This is an interesting and well-written article. At times, I wasn't sure that the tone was encyclopedic; it can seem more like a story than an article. I wasn't sure whether to ask that this be dealt with, but I ultimately decided that I would just be asking you to make the article less engaging. That doesn't seem to be productive, so I only have a few concerns:
GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:57, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
I will place this nomination on hold to allow these concerns to be addressed and/or discussed. Any questions or comments can e left here, as I have placed this page on my watchlist. Best wishes, GaryColemanFan ( talk) 20:14, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
As for the "story" comment, I didn't phrase it well. The article is well-written, and it is very engaging. Perhaps that is what I meant to say — I've reviewed 33 nominations this month, and this one stands out as the most interesting and detailed prose. All things considered, though, I'm not convinced that's a bad thing.
I am promoting the article, as I believe that it meets all six of the GA criteria. Congratulations! GaryColemanFan ( talk) 23:20, 19 October 2008 (UTC)