![]() | First Battle of Springfield has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 21, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Battle of Springfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. (This does not mean there is a consensus for "Battle" over "battle." Rather, that issue may be further discussed by proposing that this article and Second Battle of Springfield be changed to lower-case "battle.") ( non-admin closure) SilverLocust ( talk) 23:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Action at Springfield → First Battle of Springfield – Article was moved in 2019 w/o discussion under the basis that this is how the name appears in the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies in the War of the Rebellion, but the nomenclature hasn't been carried over into 20th and 21st century sources. For what it's worth, that ORs also refer to an number of other actions, including the Second Battle of Springfield by names such as "Engagement at Springfield" or "Skirmish at Springfield", so I don't think this naming is entirely unambiguous. A skim of the relevant literature suggests that "First Battle of Springfield" or the variant "Springfield I" is in greater use than "Zagonyi's Charge", so I think First Battle of Springfield is the best possible title here. Hog Farm Talk 01:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 01:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk · contribs) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Hog Farm: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 10:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
![]() | First Battle of Springfield has been listed as one of the
Warfare good articles under the
good article criteria. If you can improve it further,
please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can
reassess it. Review: August 21, 2023. ( Reviewed version). |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on First Battle of Springfield. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018.
After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than
regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors
have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the
RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{
source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot ( Report bug) 10:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)
The result of the move request was: Moved. (This does not mean there is a consensus for "Battle" over "battle." Rather, that issue may be further discussed by proposing that this article and Second Battle of Springfield be changed to lower-case "battle.") ( non-admin closure) SilverLocust ( talk) 23:40, 27 June 2023 (UTC)
Action at Springfield → First Battle of Springfield – Article was moved in 2019 w/o discussion under the basis that this is how the name appears in the Official Records of the Union and Confederate Armies in the War of the Rebellion, but the nomenclature hasn't been carried over into 20th and 21st century sources. For what it's worth, that ORs also refer to an number of other actions, including the Second Battle of Springfield by names such as "Engagement at Springfield" or "Skirmish at Springfield", so I don't think this naming is entirely unambiguous. A skim of the relevant literature suggests that "First Battle of Springfield" or the variant "Springfield I" is in greater use than "Zagonyi's Charge", so I think First Battle of Springfield is the best possible title here. Hog Farm Talk 01:34, 12 June 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. CLYDE TALK TO ME/ STUFF DONE (please mention me on reply) 01:52, 19 June 2023 (UTC)
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Reviewer: Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk · contribs) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
I'll take a look at this shortly. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 09:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
@ Hog Farm: Hi, that's all I have for now. Will await your responses. Pickersgill-Cunliffe ( talk) 10:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)