From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC) reply


Sorry, I can't help but take another! JAG UAR  19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Why is Thomaskantor italicised? I've seen it unitalicised and uncapitalised before!
    The lead summarises the article
    A suggestion, I think Thomaskantor (director of music) should be explained in other Bach articles, but I'll get to that when the time comes!
    "but may be raised to joy in a "seliger Tod"" - what is Tod?
    " (Ah, dear Christians, be comforted),[1]Bach expresses" - space needed
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Once again, I couldn't find anything major to make this be put on hold. Nice work! JAG UAR  18:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC) reply

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Ach, lieben Christen, seid getrost, BWV 114/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar ( talk · contribs) 19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC) reply


Sorry, I can't help but take another! JAG UAR  19:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC) reply

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b ( MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
    Why is Thomaskantor italicised? I've seen it unitalicised and uncapitalised before!
    The lead summarises the article
    A suggestion, I think Thomaskantor (director of music) should be explained in other Bach articles, but I'll get to that when the time comes!
    "but may be raised to joy in a "seliger Tod"" - what is Tod?
    " (Ah, dear Christians, be comforted),[1]Bach expresses" - space needed
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a ( reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c ( OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a ( major aspects): b ( focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b ( appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

Once again, I couldn't find anything major to make this be put on hold. Nice work! JAG UAR  18:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC) reply


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook