This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone put a message on the article which says:
"This article appears to be written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by rewriting promotional content from a neutral point of view and removing any inappropriate external links."
The links which they removed are the Christian Science Monitor, Slate, and CNN. How can any of those be considered "inappropriate"?
The remaining sources are the New York Times, Time magazine, the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the Wall St. Journal. How can any of those be considered "advertisements"?
How can any of those sources, from either list, be considered "promotional"?
Onceangle574 ( talk) 01:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, is there a list of all language versions available for Abundance? Cheers, Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 19:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Does this book feature significant parts about automation / computerization / technological unemployment?
This is the
talk page for discussing improvements to the
Abundance: The Future Is Better Than You Think article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's
content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Someone put a message on the article which says:
"This article appears to be written like an advertisement. Please help improve it by rewriting promotional content from a neutral point of view and removing any inappropriate external links."
The links which they removed are the Christian Science Monitor, Slate, and CNN. How can any of those be considered "inappropriate"?
The remaining sources are the New York Times, Time magazine, the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, and the Wall St. Journal. How can any of those be considered "advertisements"?
How can any of those sources, from either list, be considered "promotional"?
Onceangle574 ( talk) 01:24, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, is there a list of all language versions available for Abundance? Cheers, Horst-schlaemma ( talk) 19:16, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Does this book feature significant parts about automation / computerization / technological unemployment?